12/23/2007 12:31:12 AM
12/23/2007 1:08:32 AM
12/23/2007 1:15:44 AM
of course the surge isn't working. have you been listening to the media recently? are they reporting any progress? of course not. clearly the surge is failing or they would reporting things to the contrary, right?besides, who cares if the surge is working. it's time to bring everyone home because that's what will get me the most votes next year!
12/23/2007 1:38:40 AM
ITS THE LIBERAL CONSPIRACY!!!
12/23/2007 1:44:00 AM
hehe, I had to add the last part, otherwise no one would realize I was trolling there oh, and one more thing: there is no "a" in the word "borders." Unless you are talking about someone who offers "room and board" or who puts boards on houses and the like[Edited on December 23, 2007 at 1:48 AM. Reason : ]
12/23/2007 1:46:59 AM
This is the type of enemy we face, folks:
2/1/2008 1:08:02 PM
illustrating these people really don't care about democracy.Good thing we took out Saddam to help the war on terrorism, right hooksaw!
2/1/2008 1:22:10 PM
^ Blame America first, right, comrade? Our enemy remotely detonated explosives that were strapped to two mentally retarded women. Can you try to suppress your Bush derangement syndrome for a couple minutes and address this heinous crime? Thanks.
2/1/2008 1:26:06 PM
when you're resorting to retard bombsyou might be on your last leg......now we can say that "suicide bombing is totally retarded" with a straight face[Edited on February 1, 2008 at 1:30 PM. Reason : lololololololo... sad face]
2/1/2008 1:28:39 PM
^ Well, to be sure, those two unfortunate souls were definitely not freedom fighters. Yes and even
2/1/2008 1:33:52 PM
ignoring the fact that our troops would not even be in harms way had it not been for the faulty evidence and justification bush used to involve us in the Iraq debacle.
2/1/2008 2:57:59 PM
HUR quick question:Would you say over the last couple years, or last couple months, you've started to lean a little more to the right and perhaps wanted a little less obtrusive 'small government' etc?
2/1/2008 3:16:08 PM
I'll agree to that. Really since my sophmore year though i've always considered myself a libertarian. Liberal on social issues (no moral police, eliminate victimless crimes, safeguarding civil rights, etc) and conservative on fiscal issues (balanced budget, pro-capitalism, against free handouts for chronic poverty, less gov't spending, etc). Used to be though i placed more weight on social issues. As i have gotten older though and began working i've started placing more though on economic issues as i watched my paycheck getting chomped away by the man. I will gladly support a GOP candidate with a ecnomic policy i like as long as they are at least moderate on social issues. I can not tolerate those from the Christian right that act like the gov't should be the moral police. At least i can respect the humanitarian/environmental viewpoint of the liberal tree-hugger and/or increased socialism democrats. I also have gotten more cynical of politicians in general and desire a smaller fed with increased respect to the 10th amendment allowing teh state gov't to have more control on various issues.Regardless i still support a more non-interventionist foreign policy.[Edited on February 1, 2008 at 5:39 PM. Reason : l]
2/1/2008 5:36:57 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/02/04/iraq.main/index.htmlGOOD GOING GUYS, MISSION ACCOMPLISHED
2/4/2008 8:35:24 AM
2/4/2008 9:23:23 AM
http://www.michaelyon-online.com/media/pdf/TF_%202-7_%20IN_%20_Feb_%2008_%20Newsletter.pdf
2/4/2008 11:21:12 AM
2/4/2008 11:27:52 AM
2/4/2008 11:29:36 AM
well my views on foreign policy doesn't really go along to well with the Big Stick ideology of Neo-Cons.Plus Neo-Cons tend to appease and lasso in the Christian right vote by supporting the war on drugs, preservation of "family values", FCC (federal censorship committee) censor of TV and air material, anti-gambling initiatives, pro-life, advocating abstinence instead of safe sex in schools, and other enforcement of morals through legislation which i STRONGLY oppose[Edited on February 4, 2008 at 12:02 PM. Reason : a]
2/4/2008 11:54:39 AM
neocon literally means new conservative, and refers to someone who used to be more liberal but who has become a conservative...i think you are still misusing the word as some type of label for anything you dont like about certain conservatives when thats not at all the meaning of the word neocon...of course most of the media misuses it the same way so i don't blame you for not knowing what it really means when the media doesnt either]
2/4/2008 12:04:14 PM
from a entomology basis you are correct but..http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism#Evolution_of_neoconservative_viewsNeoconservative policies
2/4/2008 12:10:09 PM
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article3346386.eceThis seems to be a bit of encouraging news.
2/11/2008 2:20:06 PM
^^ You mean etymology. "[E]ntomology" is the scientific study of insects, dumbass. ^ Indeed.
2/11/2008 2:27:29 PM
Iraqi lawmakers pass 3 key bills
2/13/2008 1:20:05 PM
Most Iraqis Oppose U.S. Troop Presence but Admit Situation Improving
3/18/2008 1:49:18 AM
The situation is improving from "goddamn fucking horrible" to "goddamn horrible". Funny thing is we caused it to be in this state to begin with. When I spill milk all over my kitchen floor and then mop up 10% of the mess, I declare victory too!Mission accomplished! Hell fucking yeah!
3/18/2008 1:51:10 AM
3/18/2008 2:00:38 AM
Iraq is awesome and safe.Hell no, I wouldn't visit there. Are you nuts?
3/18/2008 2:13:34 AM
A newer poll in March http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/14_03_08iraqpollmarch2008.pdfThere's the full poll results. Overall, things haven't changed meaningfully since feb of last year, poll-wise.Lots of things are worse compared to 2004, and many things are about the same as feb of last year, while several other things are marginal improvements from last year. Overall, the poll shows mixed messages from Iraqis.For this question "Not personally, but in terms of Iraq, what in your opinion is the single biggest problem facing Iraq as a whole?"Security-related things were the biggest issue, which is at odds with the ABC poll. And US occupation being the next biggest category at a mere 5%.For the question of "From today’s perspective and all things considered, was it absolutely right, somewhat right, somewhat wrong, or absolutely wrong that US-led coalition forces invaded Iraq in spring 2003?"49% said it was somewhat right or absolutely right, identical to 04 levels, but much better than last year, while 50% said it was somewhat or absolutely wrong, UP significantly from 04, but also better than last year.88% say the supply for electricty is not good, which is oddly significantly worse than the past 4 years of the poll.46% of Iraqis said the security situation has gotten better in the past 6 months, which is significantly better than the previous set of six months.Only 20% of Iraqis have confidence in US occupation forces, with 79 having little or no confidence, but oddly, 30% say we've done a good job (with the same seventy saying we've done a bad job), and 30% saying they support the work of occupation forces (much worse than 04 but marginally better than august 07).And lastly for my reporting, 38% now say the US should leave immediately, which is 9 points lower than in august, but 12 points higher than in 2005. Only 4% didn't want conditions for withdrawal. And 27% say us being there makes things better while 61% says it makes things worse, which is slightly improved from last year.[Edited on March 18, 2008 at 2:31 AM. Reason : ]
3/18/2008 2:28:54 AM
^
3/18/2008 3:09:31 AM
^ Yeah which is why I said "Overall, the poll shows mixed messages from Iraqis."
3/18/2008 10:34:52 AM
3/18/2008 10:16:51 PM
There goes hooksaw again. If only liberal studies majors involved statistics or critical thinking so he could understand the difference between data and anecdotal evidence.
3/18/2008 10:20:51 PM
3/18/2008 10:27:30 PM
It's called having read books and knowing something about something.Your major is called "reading the internet" and then "pretending conservatism is in any way a viable way of thinking."The funny thing is that you fail awfully at these two objectives.
3/18/2008 10:43:12 PM
3/18/2008 10:45:39 PM
3/18/2008 10:46:31 PM
My name is LiusClues, I'm going to move to a country and live there and enjoy all the freedoms and benefits, for the sole purpose of discrediting and bashing that country. I'm a real winner with high goals and aspirations.
3/18/2008 10:53:22 PM
3/18/2008 10:54:16 PM
You would've been censored from this website long ago if this were good old Communist China
3/18/2008 10:55:40 PM
The answer is no.
3/18/2008 10:57:30 PM
i'm glad you're qualified to know the answer
3/18/2008 10:58:12 PM
Yea you're totally qualified to provide stellar analysis aintcha buddy
3/19/2008 12:21:39 AM
you too troll, you tootroll the white guy, troll the american, troll troll troll]
3/19/2008 12:22:30 AM
Which is more ironicYou calling anyone a trollYou claiming someone isn't qualifiedTrick questionDon't burnout trying to answer[Edited on March 19, 2008 at 12:24 AM. Reason : >.<]
3/19/2008 12:24:27 AM
i'm a froshkiller dickrideri think double spacing makes me cooli'm so fucking awesomewow i hate america[Edited on March 19, 2008 at 12:25 AM. Reason : >.< (this isnt my asshole btw, i like camel dick)]
3/19/2008 12:24:56 AM
Post like treetwistahRandom words5th grade insultRandom wordsUnironic pun
3/19/2008 12:27:21 AM
you're such a loser, why dont you stop post stalking me and mind your own fucking businescan you really not find anything better to do than obsess over me? are you that much of a loser?]
3/19/2008 12:29:34 AM
Why don't you call dell tech support and figure out how to turn your internet offMaybe the voices in your head will stop then
3/19/2008 12:31:00 AM