oooh ok. page 16 knows el nacho is a dumbass.[Edited on September 5, 2007 at 11:19 PM. Reason : page 16]
9/5/2007 11:19:07 PM
9/6/2007 10:58:49 AM
http://www.macrumors.com/2007/09/06/steve-jobs-open-letter-to-iphone-owners/$100 credit for early buyers
9/6/2007 3:30:29 PM
Wow, that open letter has spread amazingly quickly through the internet.
9/6/2007 3:51:14 PM
fuck yea, i was about to buy a macbook..guess i'll wait a week
9/6/2007 3:55:08 PM
The man knows how to make people like him, that's for sure.
9/6/2007 4:03:14 PM
it appears as though he actually listens to his customers..and does some reasonable things for them. complicated, i know..more businesses should pay attention to him
9/6/2007 4:18:27 PM
thats what i said should happen but then i was thinking that $100 x early iPhone customers is a lot of money. I was thinking in terms of giving us credit to buy iTunes stuff so its not a lose lose situation for Apple........but $100 store credit is even better! Hello new apple keyboard.
9/6/2007 4:27:22 PM
store credit? they gave me credit back on my credit card....but that was yesterday]
9/6/2007 4:30:39 PM
so the other $100 went...in his pocket?
9/6/2007 4:33:43 PM
Yeah because giving people complete retroactive pricing is to be expected. It's still what... 10-20 million or so dollars?[Edited on September 6, 2007 at 4:37 PM. Reason : ]
9/6/2007 4:35:35 PM
He wants a lot of good press about the company right before the holiday season.. this is a smart move[Edited on September 6, 2007 at 4:44 PM. Reason : ^^^ when did you buy yours? ]
9/6/2007 4:44:11 PM
So this is Apple being generous and not an indication that they were clearly price-gouging their customers the last 2 months? Gotcha...
9/6/2007 5:10:17 PM
Of course he was price gouging, when ISN'T Apple doing that? It's just a bit of a first for a company to give money back instead of running off with it.As I said, he sure knows how to make people like him. Twisted way to do it, but it works.
9/6/2007 5:19:38 PM
A company is GIVING REFUNDS to early adopters (Something that has NEVER been done, as far as I know) and you guys are bitching.unbelievable....you guys do realize that one of a companies' objectives is usuallly to make a profit, right???[Edited on September 6, 2007 at 5:24 PM. Reason : d]
9/6/2007 5:23:39 PM
Hello and welcome to the wolfweb. Today we will be bitching about any and everything. Nothing will be good enough. Please enjoy your stay
9/6/2007 5:26:27 PM
^^ They're only giving the "refund" (in the form of a store credit, which is a win-win for Apple... either you don't spend all of it or you buy something for $100 or more which cost them less than that) because everyone raised a big stink about the 33% price slash after two months, and rightfully so. I hate how people spin this like Apple is such a nice company. The fact is, they weren't planning on giving anyone a refund and they did a real dick move by pricing the phone WELL above a much lower price that they're comfortable selling the phone at.Face it, the $599 price point was a shameless money grab and Apple is trying to save face because they got seriously called out on it.[Edited on September 6, 2007 at 7:18 PM. Reason : ...]
9/6/2007 7:15:22 PM
wtf money grab? are you insane? Apple (nor any other company) is not obligated to set a price other than what they think people will pay. and people obviously were willing to pay $599 for it. so the fuck what? this happens every day and nobody bitches about it[Edited on September 6, 2007 at 7:23 PM. Reason : where is my $10k Lexus ][Edited on September 6, 2007 at 7:25 PM. Reason : you can make a pizza for $1.30 and domino's wants $13.99 for it!?!?!? LOCK SUSPEND TERMINATE]
9/6/2007 7:23:08 PM
^^ the optimal price is the one that makes them the most money, they're in business for that..not to make everybody happy because they can afford apple products. they had no trouble selling nearly a million already, the demand was there at that price..why would they be stupid enough to lower the price from the get-go? Most companies would have set the price at the absolute highest one the market would allow...but apple has given money back (ok so its not cash..still more than they had to do and more than anybody else virtually would do) to its initial customers, lowered the prices dramatically and increased features... not trying to sound like an apple fanboy but they're making people like themedit:just saw this:
9/6/2007 7:28:48 PM
9/6/2007 7:37:40 PM
And with the launch of the iPod touch the costs of all those nifty iPhone features get spread out over a couple million of those units.While it's hard to argue the iPhone wasn't overpriced originally (many sites did stories explaining this in detail) they also didn't have to give early adopters store credit or even drop the price as much they did. Calling them money grubbing is absolutely stupid. No shit, they're a company- they charge what people will pay. Do you hate market economies? I mean there's plenty of reason to, but I think you just have a little extra unreasonable venom for apple in particular.In the same vein, it's naive to think that the original price of the iPhone wasn't ridiculous. It was about twice production cost. Attacking apple for this (after they're actually giving those people something back) is asinine. It's because early adopters were willing to pay too much to have the coolest new phone.
9/6/2007 7:56:18 PM
9/6/2007 8:07:52 PM
quit whining. thats what you get for sitting in line for 2 days to get an expensive as shit piece of technology in the first place. don't put up with that bullshit and you wont get screwed.
9/6/2007 8:23:07 PM
I don't recall ever waiting in line for a iPhone. Just walked into the apple store and 2 minutes later had a 8gb. This was in Crabtree.
9/6/2007 8:55:26 PM
9/6/2007 8:59:13 PM
^This is unprecedented and you know it. The iPhone is a bleeding-edge/ultra high profile device. To see a $200 price cut in the first two months is insane. Even the best Apple rumor mills probably never could have guessed this one.
9/6/2007 9:18:40 PM
^ True, this massive a drop in this short amount of time is unusual even for Apple. It is also brilliant and very much needed if they want to capture cell market share over the holiday season. Heh, it also confirms my creedo never to buy a first generation Apple product- or nearly any first generation high-tech product if I can help it.[Edited on September 6, 2007 at 9:29 PM. Reason : ]
9/6/2007 9:28:37 PM
9/6/2007 9:32:52 PM
here's all the iPod models and launch prices, btwhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ipod#Models
9/6/2007 10:14:38 PM
9/6/2007 10:35:40 PM
ahahha synapse ftw
9/6/2007 10:46:55 PM
9/6/2007 10:49:27 PM
that wasn't a video
9/6/2007 10:51:33 PM
so they added a feature and dropped the price significantly....
9/6/2007 11:05:25 PM
i kind of had all these thoughts rolling around in m head, but Cringley summed it up nicely:http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2007/pulpit_20070906_002891.html
9/7/2007 12:54:13 AM
9/7/2007 1:04:28 AM
if you read it in context, I believe he was using "undeserved" in the context of a certain scenario - being the case had customers not complained.---as far as "summing up my feelings", I don't think Cringley (or myself) is necessarily slamming Jobs or Apple for this move. But I do tend to agree that this has been in the works for some time, and Jobs knew what the reaction was going to be, and he had already planned on giving out a $100 credit. I bet the apology note on apple.com right now was crafted at the same time the $200 price drop idea was ever floated. Then he goes and "stuns the world" with a $200 price drop, acts surprised at the visceral reaction (which, again, he knew would happen), then goes and makes retribution by giving $100 store credit. If he had announced the $200 drop and the $100 credit at the same time, people would still be really pissed (some are, i suppose). But he announced the $200 drop, basically acting like he was doing the world a favor. Then the next day when, *oh my!*, his "favor" pissed so many people off, he just threw in a little incentive for some super PR. genius, really. i don't fault him for it. I fully agree with the supply/demand model. Apple can price their products at whatever they want, and they don't owe anybody anything if people decide to buy at that price. Furthermore, i also agree with the notion that the $100 credit will in the end more than pay for itself. I mean, what can you get for $100 at an Apple store, especially considering you already own an iPhone if you got the credit.... a Shuffle? a case? yeah, maybe..... but for a lot of people (ignoring the large number of people who will never make use of the credit), the $100 will go towards an iMac or MacBook or something. [Edited on September 7, 2007 at 1:21 AM. Reason : .]
9/7/2007 1:15:15 AM
no he's saying that Apple's $100 "share" of the $200 "overcharge" is undeserved. this douchebag believes that the entire $200 profit that Apple made was undeserved
9/7/2007 1:19:13 AM
^$100 towards a $1000+ item is really pointless....I'll be using mine on accessories or software. that new apple keyboard looks hot! Hell, use it to buy an iTunes gift card for $100[Edited on September 7, 2007 at 2:49 AM. Reason : fda]
9/7/2007 2:49:10 AM
where is escargs?????????? oh
9/7/2007 8:31:53 AM
9/7/2007 8:43:02 AM
has anyone neglected to mention that a normal 'cool' phone costs at least $599? Americans are so spoiled when it comes to buying cellphones that they forget how much they really go for....
9/7/2007 9:23:32 AM
because we care how much a cell phone costs in kuala lumpur
9/7/2007 9:28:14 AM
surprised you even know where that is. I was talking about the UK, Germany, and other European countries...or are they 3rd world countries to you?
9/7/2007 9:30:48 AM
why would i care what cell phones cost in europe? or anywhere else?seriously, it's the same tired shit that people come up with when they say "WELL GAS COSTS $28273284 A GALLON IN LONDON!!!"so?
9/7/2007 9:38:52 AM
it also explains why the iPhone is the first interesting phone to be released in the US. With that attitude its no wonder you get all the shitty hand me downs from Europe.and that is the dumbest analogy you could have come up with. troll away.[Edited on September 7, 2007 at 9:40 AM. Reason : fda]
9/7/2007 9:40:01 AM
9/7/2007 9:43:42 AM
^^ i couldn't possibly care any less about a "cool" phoneif i can make fucking telephone calls with it and the service doesn't drop all the time, the battery lasts more than an hour and it doesn't fall apart within a month, i don't give a shiti want the damn thing to be cheapso again, tell me why i should care what all the "cool" phones in europe cost[Edited on September 7, 2007 at 9:53 AM. Reason : *]
9/7/2007 9:52:40 AM
then what are you doing here? the iPhone falls under 'cool' phone and is not cheap. Sounds to me like its way above your budget....[Edited on September 7, 2007 at 10:17 AM. Reason : fda]
9/7/2007 10:17:14 AM
DUDESWHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU ALL ARGUING ABOUTSO THE IPHONE DROPPED IN PRICEBIG FUCKING SURPRISETHERE IS NOT A CELL PHONE ON THE PLANET THAT DOESNT DROP IN PRICE AFTER A COUPLE OF MONTHSLIKE WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU ALL ARGUING?HURRRRRRRRRR IPHONE ADOPTERS GOT OWNED HURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRANYBODY THAT BUYS ELECTRONICS KNOWS THIS HOW IT WORKS. DONT BE A DUMB FGT.
9/7/2007 10:25:16 AM