Sounds more like teh situation is becoming more unstable and could explode.
11/3/2011 11:55:11 AM
jesus, that's a lot of people.video of people: http://www.ktvu.com/videos/news/raw-video-newschopper-2-footage-of-huge-crowd/vD4mx/[Edited on November 3, 2011 at 11:07 PM. Reason : front page of cnn.com? michael jackson's doctor...]
11/3/2011 10:50:31 PM
The "attacking cops" in Oakland and "violence" was perpetrated by agent provocateurs. Most notably the group "Black Bloc" infiltrated and their only goal was to cause trouble. This unfortunately isn't the first time they have done this at notable protests. They tend to like ruining things for everyone else.
11/4/2011 9:01:08 AM
^Yeah, that is their goal isn't it? To cause chaos and rioting. Black Bloc that is.
11/4/2011 9:16:19 AM
11/4/2011 9:44:51 AM
^^ As far as I know yes. They do it at the G8 and G20 protests all the time.
11/4/2011 10:20:08 AM
Worth reposting, especially for all of you OWS-Pro-Obama idiots (yes, if you are Pro-OWS and Pro-Obama, you are an idiot).http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/mf-global-ties-awkward-for-obama-campaign/2011/11/02/gIQA9w5ogM_print.htmlMF Global ties awkward for Obama campaign - Washington Post - T.W. Farnam
11/4/2011 10:48:48 AM
Any and every politician at that level is guaranteed to have benefitted from some money that was donated with strings attached. That's what's wrong with the current system. Political campaigns cost a lot of money and those contributions in our system have to come from private parties. Election campaign reform is one of the OWS goals.
11/4/2011 11:22:14 AM
I wish Fred Hampton wasn't murdered by the FBI/Chicago Police so he could see the Occupy Movement.[Edited on November 4, 2011 at 1:59 PM. Reason : ...]
11/4/2011 1:57:59 PM
dumping my bank on Mondayfuck banks
11/4/2011 3:47:29 PM
I am pro OWS but not pro Obama.
11/4/2011 4:55:16 PM
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=niall+ferguson+ascent+of+money&aq=3s&oq=naill+ferguson
11/4/2011 4:58:19 PM
well played.http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1oHRdiklTlUScott Walker is such a cunt
11/5/2011 5:28:36 PM
11/5/2011 5:44:12 PM
yep. shutting down a business is truly a "peaceful protest." They should all be arrested and thrown in jail. You certainly have the right to protest. You don't have the right to block all traffic in and out of a port. Fuck them all
11/5/2011 5:57:29 PM
all:Predeterminer: Used to refer to the whole quantity or extent of a particular group or thing: "all the people I met"; "10% of all cars sold".
11/5/2011 6:57:40 PM
you don't think that the people blocking the port should have been arrested?
11/5/2011 6:58:51 PM
Yes. Every one. I think that the protestors cleaning up the graffiti from the "protestors" the night before should be arrested too. They should know better than to protest somewhere where there's a chance that someone else, affiliated or unaffiliated, might vandalize something. Actual intention matters not.[Edited on November 5, 2011 at 7:04 PM. Reason : ]
11/5/2011 7:03:20 PM
OH MY HATRED ROT IN JAIL YOU HIPPIES!
11/5/2011 7:08:33 PM
where did I say those people should be arrested? right. I didn't.
11/5/2011 7:11:22 PM
11/5/2011 7:13:51 PM
Assuming for a minute you were to arrest ALL of these people, where exactly would you put them?Video of how many people participated: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4jYdCaHrjQ
11/5/2011 7:26:06 PM
11/5/2011 7:27:56 PM
11/5/2011 9:47:16 PM
11/5/2011 10:22:10 PM
11/5/2011 10:32:50 PM
I drove past the occupy Raleigh protesters this afternoon....all 15 of them
11/5/2011 10:55:02 PM
^The reason there were only 15 or so is because people rotate out in shifts. It isn't easy when you can't camp or really maintain supplies to stay there all the time. Additionally (believe it or not) most have jobs and/or other obligations at times. The peak times are usually in the evenings when GA meetings take place. The occupation has gone on 24/7 since 10/15 and today is day 23. Yesterday we had a group take part in National Bank Transfer day so only a few held the sidewalk while that went on. On another note the support from people driving by has been overwhelmingly positive from honking to dropping off food and water to cash donations on the spot. There the few cliche middle fingers and "get a job hippy" comments but they seem few and far between and only serve keep things interesting . The fact is during the city council meeting we had plenty on hand to fill that room. We had 1,000 for the opening rally on 10/15 but only a small percentage of people will actually stay dedicated and occupy. This isn't New York or Oakland. This is Raleigh (a much smaller town and not really in a progressive area of the country overall) so getting those sorts of numbers is a pretty tall order.
11/6/2011 9:31:01 AM
^I have seen pickup basketball games with more people than thatif people are going to protest they need to go big and do it right or not do it at allthese cats have the right idea[Edited on November 6, 2011 at 10:12 AM. Reason : .]
11/6/2011 10:11:50 AM
11/6/2011 5:29:34 PM
I don't even see Raleigh in your list. And have you even bothered looking at the list? Half of the "crimes" committed aren't even crimes.
11/6/2011 7:21:44 PM
Yeah...I emboldened the instances where serious crimes were alleged, italicized when Anti-Semitism was displayed (which, in some of the "cooler" European countries, is illegal), and underlined instances when the OWS crowds actually hurt business (mostly small business that would probably fall into the "99%".I thought you would have figured that one out by now.
11/6/2011 9:23:34 PM
that does nothing to help your argument.many of the bold claims insinuate crimes, and don't specify what crimes are being committeditalicized acts aren't fucking crimes. and we're not in some "cool" european country, so that means nothing.underlined crimes aren't even that many crimes. aside from a few acts of vandalism, there aren't that many crimes in your list.The rest is a bunch of propaganda and bullshit. your list sucks, just admit it.and say, what would you classify this as? bold, italicized, or underlined?:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0pX9LeE-g8[Edited on November 6, 2011 at 9:47 PM. Reason : ]
11/6/2011 9:40:38 PM
You need to rethink what you're offering as the bold events.What likelihood was there for any given offense that it was committed by an occupier?Many of the offenses where it IS overtly claimed that it was done by and occupier (which are few to begin with) are extremely dubious, as is whatever source gave you this list that was fast track on the way to discrediting itself with the exaggerations that are obvious.
11/6/2011 9:50:31 PM
11/6/2011 9:56:27 PM
11/6/2011 9:59:53 PM
Go back to bed America. You are free to do as we tell you.
11/6/2011 10:16:13 PM
"in order to qualify for welfare, you have to quit your job"
11/6/2011 10:17:44 PM
11/7/2011 2:00:11 PM
youve got to be kidding me.[Edited on November 7, 2011 at 2:04 PM. Reason : ^5 and what are you doing with your life, shrike?]
11/7/2011 2:03:42 PM
i wish the OWS'ers could be the CEOs for a daythey would surely turn down the bonuses and tell the shareholders to fuck offthen we could all finally be happy
11/7/2011 2:25:19 PM
Inside the Orwellian machinations in Occupy Wall Streethttp://hotair.com/archives/2011/11/06/inside-the-orwellian-machinations-in-occupy-wall-street/
11/7/2011 5:23:19 PM
Orwellian is probably too strong a term. I think it's more that the protestors started off thinking that they could create some kind of egalitarian utopia only to come to the same realization like every revolutionary group before them: there are reasons why we've organized structured governments, why nations don't govern by consensus, why we have skilled bureaucrats to handle things like resource allocation, why we can't barter for everything and why law enforcement is a necessary evil even amongst the most well meaning communities. Now the dreamers are at a junction where they're growing up and are developing more formal governing systems, and this moment is yet another test for the movement.
11/8/2011 4:32:59 PM
11/8/2011 5:29:31 PM
^Can't believe I find myself agreeing with much of what you said. I disagree with your "abolish central planning" attitude, though, but I'm sure that comes as no surprise. Likewise, I don't see how you can have a "abolish social-contract" attitude, either. But whatever, that's just general progressive vs libertarian arguments that have been had a million times on this board. Still though, I'll put my money on Israel vs Iran becoming an issue just long enough to distract our national attention from our own domestic issues.anyway, this is relevant: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHiicN0Kg10&feature=relatedhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xe1d32I_wUYShouldn't come as a surprise to anyone who's been paying attention, but at least it's information that is finally coming to the surface. There's no line between corporate interests and government anymore. It's a boundary that has been eroding for at least 30 years now, in my opinion, and I think it is completely gone at this point.It's pretty fucking sad when the US government has the same level of effectiveness as the NCAA infractions committee.[Edited on November 8, 2011 at 6:36 PM. Reason : ]
11/8/2011 6:29:16 PM
11/8/2011 6:44:48 PM
11/8/2011 9:19:13 PM
^ "Corporations are people, friend" - Willard Romney
11/8/2011 9:50:02 PM
11/8/2011 9:59:54 PM
^ Lysander Spooner was a nut. The Social contract is an abstraction, not a binding legal agreement you can sign. The true fact of the matter is that we live in meat space and as such laws must be enforced over entire geographic areas and not on a person by person basis. If political legitimacy hinged on everyone signing social contracts, then it really wouldn't be a goal worth reaching. Think about it. would criminals sign the social contract? If not, what would that mean for their status under the law? Could they still be legitimatly punished for violating laws they never promised to follow? And what about public goods problems? Even if I were not a criminal I may wish to opt of our political arrangement to avoid paying taxes if I could still reap the benefits they provide (national defense for ex)Saying you never signed a social contract is the worst argument in the world and has been for over 100 years
11/8/2011 10:37:07 PM