141My cousin's photo from this weekend, looking up from the center courtyard of the hotel we stayed at in Myrtle Beach.]
9/20/2009 10:08:29 PM
moar football.
9/20/2009 10:47:03 PM
re post from bottom of last page:Anyone else want to give their input on reasons to go for a Cannon XSI over a Nikon D3000/5000 or any entry level Nikon SLR for that matter? Looks to me like the Cannon might be a better camera for the price if you look at features but the Nikon lenses look to be better and people seem to like nikon image quality over cannon. I don't need video but I do like the idea of transitioning with a live view LCD but thats not really that important. Thanks in advance
9/21/2009 8:12:22 AM
I think mostly that's just personal opinion. I have the XSi and I really like it, but to decide I went to the store and tried both the Nikons and the Canons out. I'm not so sure there's going to be much of a difference in image quality in either entry level camera. You should really just try them out and see which one you like better. (size, menus, camera layout, etc).
9/21/2009 12:27:47 PM
^ exactlyyou're not going to find any evidence of better image quality between similarly-priced entry-level models from canon and nikon (opinion, maybe, but no factual evidence)...the glass you use is what matters, and since that is determined by your budget, it's 6 of one and a half-dozen of the other*shrug*
9/21/2009 12:58:39 PM
Go to camera store.Hold both cameras.Whichever feels better is the one you should buy. If you're shopping for entry level DSLR's, this is going to make more of a difference than anything else. You won't ever get better or learn if you don't use your camera, and being comfortable with it is conducive to more use. ^, ^^, both quality posts.
9/21/2009 4:09:57 PM
I've held all 3 but no store has them with any batteries that don't die after 15 seconds so that kind of sucks. The D3000 feels really nice. They all have some features that are different/better/worse but thats just the marketing. I think I'll probably end up sticking with the Nikon when I do decide to take the plunge but we'll see what kinds of deals come up in the next few months. Thanks for the input. Down the road, is there any difference between the lenses Nikon and Cannon make that are compatible with these cameras? I know neither have AF motors built in and I'm thinking Nikon may have better lenses anyway. Any validity to this? This is a question for way down the line I know but I don't want to regret buying b/c of problems trying to upgrade the lenses in the future.
9/21/2009 5:39:19 PM
9/21/2009 9:29:02 PM
^^ if you at least pretend you're serious about buying on the spot, they will scare up a battery for you.also, go someplace that's not a chain.[Edited on September 22, 2009 at 6:59 PM. Reason : ..]
9/22/2009 6:59:05 PM
If I was to want to buy said digital slr camera, nothing fancy, how much should I expect to spend?
9/22/2009 7:47:16 PM
$600 at least
9/22/2009 8:12:52 PM
Some old stuff, a few new.
9/23/2009 3:25:31 AM
i picked up a knock-off gary fong puffer diffuser from meritline for $4 shipped...got it yesterday and i must say, for an amateur who doesn't want to spend the money on a proper diffuser, this thing is very cool and more than worth the $4the puffer only comes with the white diffuser, i believe, but the knock-off comes with the blue, orange, and whitei'll post some unedited image comparisons later (they're on my camera, but i want to do a more consistent test before i post them)
9/23/2009 8:39:39 AM
that looks a lot better than my clear plastic film canister
9/23/2009 11:00:17 AM
My lens hood casts a shadow whenever the popup flash is used. No dice.That certainly does seem like a solid 4 dollar investment. Definitely makes a HUGE difference.
9/23/2009 1:05:28 PM
I've got a D40 for sale in classifieds!!
9/23/2009 1:19:41 PM
9/23/2009 2:04:29 PM
9/23/2009 7:38:50 PM
peace
9/24/2009 3:14:12 AM
and that one in carrboro, Southeastern, I think, on west main out by NC craft gallery and balloons n tunes.
9/24/2009 7:51:33 AM
Just sold my camera. That is all.
9/25/2009 2:01:52 PM
nothing groundbreaking here, just some shots from the Gail Perkins Memorial Ovarian Cancer 5k run this past weekend. this was joie's first 5k run! joie was #462lining up at the starting linejoie finishing the racepracticing panning
9/28/2009 7:10:53 PM
A harbor seal checking the beach out near Santa Cruz:Better than expected results I got with my father's el cheapo Promaster 70-300mm zoom.
9/28/2009 11:48:22 PM
http://vimeo.com/6487566http://vimeo.com/6475938
9/29/2009 8:12:30 PM
Looks like they have some nice clean water out there in Santa Cruz.
9/30/2009 1:19:47 AM
9/30/2009 2:35:30 AM
My 7D should be arriving tomorrow!
9/30/2009 2:52:44 PM
post lots of shots now plz
9/30/2009 4:35:10 PM
Went out to Yellowstone for about two weeks earlier this month. Haven't had time to go through them all, cept for a few I specifically edited for my school projects. I'm pretty happy with the shot I took of the Grand Tetons with the Snake River, similar to the famous Ansel Adams shot of 1942.
9/30/2009 5:17:18 PM
nice work. interesting choice of border.
9/30/2009 5:38:21 PM
4x5 motherfucker. :p
9/30/2009 5:38:59 PM
the DR is small on screen, should look much better if you make large print.
10/2/2009 3:41:35 PM
I really like that shot of the tetons. Curious, though, how the colors looked, cuz some of the deciduous trees look like they've already started changing colors (as much as I can tell in BW).
10/2/2009 4:16:37 PM
Wintermute, Thats actually a juvenile elephant seal.
10/2/2009 8:58:58 PM
Question for you guys.I was looking through my SE Asia pictures today and I took a crapload of Angkor Wat at sunrise. For some reason, one of the pics came out looking like this:instead of the rest which more or less look like this:Any idea why?
10/3/2009 4:49:22 AM
Perhaps you zoomed in in the middle of an exposure?
10/3/2009 10:47:31 PM
I'm not sure my camera is able to do that (just a crappy point and shoot) but it could be a possibility!
10/3/2009 11:11:18 PM
double exposure
10/5/2009 12:22:43 AM
30sec exposure in the Cloud ChamberLame shots with my new 100mm macro.
10/5/2009 2:54:43 AM
10/5/2009 5:38:35 AM
I wish I was at the beach.
10/5/2009 5:49:49 AM
Some shots @ Chicago.[Edited on October 5, 2009 at 2:29 PM. Reason : ..]
10/5/2009 2:28:31 PM
Just cuz I haven't posted any in a while...
10/5/2009 5:10:32 PM
I'm headed down to Miami, Fl for 2 months for my commercial internship for school. With that, I'm still selling my 30D w/ grip for 450 to anyone here. I also have a Canon 1DmkII with basically a brand new shutter for 1100 if anyone is interested. I just have no need for these bodies anymore and would rather have the money in other gear.
10/5/2009 5:12:21 PM
JBaz, really nice picture of the Grand Tetons--I've always liked that Ansel Adams photograph and will be climbing that thing next summer. I'm thinking about the 30d...SFAOK, thanks for the proper ID of the seal--I was just telling my girlfriend how I wanted to see one!
10/6/2009 12:02:47 AM
50D came yesterday...big and awesome move from the XTi. A lot more versatility and being able to use an ISO at 800 and get decent shots will be fun.
10/6/2009 12:18:27 PM
Ronny, that cloud chamber pic is pretty sweet. Pinhole lenses ftw. What ISO was that? Lets go shoot something tonight, PM me.
10/6/2009 1:54:32 PM
OK, I'm still fairly new to this but I'm heading to Jamaica this weekend and thought it would be a good crash course. I've got the D40 and went to Wolf Camera to pickup some filters to try out. I got the Tristar Optics pack with a UV Filter and C-PL Filter for $30. Are these good for the price or are they junk? Any suggestions on the best methods to using them? Any other filters I should look into buying?
10/6/2009 1:54:33 PM
With filters you get what you pay for, so Tristar is bottom of the barrell. But, using the CPL filter for affects is better than nothing. Use the CPL to take reflections off water and make blue skies blue-er. Screw it onto your lens and then rotate the front ring of the filter til you like what you see in the viewfinder.The UV filter doesn't affect your picture much and is most useful as simply protection for the front element of your lens. Then on the other hand, your D40 kit lens isn't very expensive/high-quality to begin with, so putting a cheap UV filter on it certainly isn't going to help out your picture quality any.
10/6/2009 2:07:16 PM
[Edited on October 6, 2009 at 4:22 PM. Reason : spacing]
10/6/2009 4:21:07 PM