again, raw footage from today's experiment.[Edited on February 28, 2009 at 9:10 PM. Reason : ]
2/28/2009 9:08:34 PM
2/28/2009 9:13:27 PM
^^I actually said "AHHH!" out loud when the camera falls off in the first video. Then again, I've fallen off of a few bikes, and that's pretty much what I remember seeing...lots of curb.
2/28/2009 9:43:16 PM
^^^ was that Apex Middle School that you passed by?[Edited on February 28, 2009 at 9:45 PM. Reason : .]
2/28/2009 9:45:06 PM
ran a stop sign there, didn't you?
2/28/2009 10:21:13 PM
^^^^^Thats some nice footage... what mph did you get up to?[Edited on February 28, 2009 at 11:27 PM. Reason : .]
2/28/2009 11:26:45 PM
^^haha i noticed the same thing...
2/28/2009 11:33:02 PM
I made a light box today so that i can shoot my gf's yarn better. She dyes and sells it.I only had two small halogen desklamps to light it with which blurred the shadows and caused some white balance issues. I think if i get a big bright 90watt CFL which are 5500k it'll work a lot better.
3/1/2009 12:39:21 AM
3/1/2009 4:49:42 AM
what kind of camera do you have?
3/1/2009 1:48:48 PM
3/1/2009 3:22:40 PM
just a couple of the many shots i got friday while out doing some more diamondback surveys. the group caught a total of 16 diamondbacks for the day, 9 of which were mine. 5 of the 16 all came from one stump!!! watch your step!the largest of the day, i walked up on this big boy sitting next to two smaller females near a nice stump, and 2 small males emerged from the grass after we caught the first 3. This one was just a hair under 5 ft, and something like 2.8kg. ended up being a recapture from last year, one of three i found piled together. one of the two females he was with last year was caught with him again on this occasion.headshot of the same big guy, you can see several of us reflected in his eye.the first two i found of the day, these were literally found within minutes of the first site we stopped by.here's another i found, in situ.and one more that was found by the lead herpetologist. the day was so crazy that there was no way i could pull off a shot of each individual, especially since we had to take data on every one we caught.there's your creepy addition from me for now.
3/1/2009 4:32:09 PM
3/1/2009 4:41:54 PM
OMGDOF
3/1/2009 10:11:09 PM
I really want a prime lens, but I'm torn between the following two lenses for a D40TWW - Should I go for the following:the Sigma 30mm 1.4 HSMor wait for the Nikkor 35mm DX 1.8 (comes out in about a month for ~$100+ less)Sigma - http://www.sigmaphoto.com/lenses/lenses_all_details.asp?id=3354&navigator=17Nikkor - http://www.nikonusa.com/Find-Your-Nikon/Product/Camera-Lenses/2183/AF-S-DX-NIKKOR-35mm-f%252F1.8G.html[Edited on March 1, 2009 at 10:50 PM. Reason : jkhg]
3/1/2009 10:48:15 PM
3/1/2009 11:21:15 PM
^^SigmaI've heard nothing but awesome things about that lens.
3/1/2009 11:23:13 PM
3/1/2009 11:25:19 PM
before everyone starts taking pictures tomorrow, remember, compensate your camera by +1 stop. You can do this with either exposure compensation or manually set your shutter and aperture. Lets see some cool snow pictures!
3/2/2009 1:30:44 AM
I thought it was better to underexpose digital photos though, so you don't have blown highlights and lost detail. You can always correct for exposure later.
3/2/2009 2:01:04 AM
if you rely on your camera's meter, which is based on reflective metering, a subject that is white will give you a false reading. Not only that, but the fact that white snow is very shinny, it will reflect even more light and again give you a false reading. This is due to the fact that with reflective meters, it's based upon getting proper exposure from 18% gray so if your scene is all white, it will underexpose the scene to make the whites look 18% gray.And yes, if you can't get proper exposure, it's better to underexpose a digital photo so you don't blow out your highlights. Effectively you can go -2/3 or +1/3 from the original exposure with no recourse, but you can save pictures that's -2 stops under exposed or +1 stop through some processes if you shot in RAW. You can't do too much with just a JPEG.
3/2/2009 2:12:29 AM
3/2/2009 2:28:30 PM
LOLI thought Kiwi already had an entry level digetal camera?
3/2/2009 3:22:37 PM
jlancas03, i would and will be getting the Nikon 35mm. The Sigma i good, and would be the only choice if youre FX or planning on going full frame, but the new 35mm is nice and compact like the 50mm F1.8D, autofocuses, has round aperture blades for a nice bokeh, and one reviewer who got it early says its fantastic optically and even sharper open than the F1.4 Nikkor. And its cheaper. sold.
3/2/2009 4:26:19 PM
I agree with JBaz, those product shots are spot on, danny
3/2/2009 4:36:01 PM
^^ $200? must have!
3/2/2009 7:13:24 PM
Here are some quick snow pics.1.2.3.4.[Edited on March 3, 2009 at 7:43 AM. Reason : adfs]
3/3/2009 7:41:34 AM
OMG Weeeees! HaaaayNice pics.I have some snow pictures too, but I'll have to upload them later.
3/3/2009 8:52:48 AM
dannydigtl, does your gf sell her yarn online? I want the purpley one
3/3/2009 9:01:55 AM
I picked up a Tiffen Orange 15 filter the other day. It isn't intended to be used with color photography, but I couldn't resist.On Ash Wednesday, I had to go to noon mass for some footage.Joe is a goofy dude. I was trying to show him the distortion caused by shooting at 11mm, and I hit my camera on the ceiling. This was his reaction.Cat tail moustache.Yes, our cat does sit like this. All the time.
3/3/2009 10:07:03 PM
Gratuitous snow pictures.
3/3/2009 10:09:41 PM
were those all taken with your 11-16?(it is 11-16, isn't it?)[Edited on March 3, 2009 at 10:11 PM. Reason : KFGK]
3/3/2009 10:10:47 PM
Yup.
3/3/2009 10:14:08 PM
damn, i've got to get a wide angle lens. i love the look.
3/3/2009 10:15:53 PM
^^^^I like that last one a lot.[Edited on March 3, 2009 at 10:34 PM. Reason : carrrots]
3/3/2009 10:33:44 PM
i like that last one amber1.
3/3/2009 10:37:02 PM
Yeah the graveyard shot is the bees knees.
3/3/2009 10:37:28 PM
thanks, I tried to tweak that one a little with the editing thing on Flickr, but it said my bandwidth was maxed
3/3/2009 10:39:26 PM
ronny. ahhhhhhhh kudos ^ avogadro's number
3/3/2009 11:21:23 PM
and that video is stellar jbaz!!!
3/3/2009 11:26:41 PM
Well, my Powershot A570IS isn't a dSLR, but I'll post these anyway since it's the only setup I have for underwater usage (the video feature is an added bonus). Can't afford a good dSLR underwater setup right now. Housings + strobes = $$$$$$I spent this weekend cave diving at Peacock Springs in Florida. Got some decent photos and video, I think. These are straight out of the camera, just resized.Main cavern at Peacock 1, looking out into the basin.Off to the side I found some cool light beams coming in around some rocks...I tried to get division between the bright rays of sunlight streaming into the cavern (photos were taken around noon on Monday) and the blackness of the interior of the cavern zone. Didn't turn out quite like I wanted, but it will suffice.Last view of the cavern zone before rounding the corner into the cave zone (with the differentiation between cavern and cave being that you can still see natural light in the cavern zone).One of my dive buddies posing in the cavern zone at Peacock after a dive on Sunday...Taking underwater shots is quite a challenge, especially using very low ambient light with a point-and-shoot, due to their lack of light-gathering capabilities. Trying to either hold position in the water column or plant yourself onto a rock while not stirring up clouds of silt in the process (thus pissing people off who want to dive in the crystal-clear water...) can be challenging at times.[Edited on March 3, 2009 at 11:35 PM. Reason : ]
3/3/2009 11:26:47 PM
Has every photographer in this thread taken a picture off the Boylan St. bridge? If not, go get it out of your system now.p.s....Mine was in an exhibit at Points of View Gallery
3/3/2009 11:33:09 PM
i know i have.
3/3/2009 11:33:59 PM
Come on man, I had a new filter and wanted a shot of the sky to test it out.
3/3/2009 11:35:07 PM
lol. Only other photographers would notice this trend so it's ok. It's a sweet shot even if every photographer in Raleigh has taken a crack at it. Every shot will be a little different, so it's actually pretty interesting to see the various interpretations of that scene.[Edited on March 3, 2009 at 11:39 PM. Reason : l]
3/3/2009 11:38:38 PM
yes, I think everyone has.
3/4/2009 10:55:29 AM
I haven't!
3/4/2009 11:08:53 AM
lovin the pics in this thread
3/4/2009 12:28:24 PM
it's so overdone taking pictures of the skyline from there...
3/4/2009 7:13:42 PM
117
3/4/2009 7:26:24 PM