what was it that kurtz said that knocked it out of the park?
5/3/2011 11:06:36 AM
Anyone have any predictions about how long the Jason Young case will be?
5/3/2011 11:06:48 AM
Michael Morwick- NC made it clear she had no interest in this guyCraig Duncan- made a pass at nancy, but they never bwnScott Heider- possible i missed his testimonyUnidentified Suspicious Person Suggested by John Pearson- unidentified guy suggested by shady guy? really?First year marriage affair- name?Tim Simmons- possible, but not provenBrett Adam- nancy never had any inappropriate contact with this guy?Brett Wilson- Nancy's love interest BEFORE marrying BradChad Dean- nancy's brother in law, but how long ago was it that they hooked up? do you know?John Pearson- nobody is denying this one
5/3/2011 11:07:50 AM
I wonder how many times we will hear Cummings say Mrs Cupper or Mr Cupper this afternoon
5/3/2011 11:08:06 AM
^^ I think judge I'll allow it has paid attention to more of the case than you have
5/3/2011 11:09:59 AM
9 guys, 7 guys, 3 guys, 50 guys. What is reducing or increasing the number of affairs she had by one or two going to prove?Oh, yup. Only 6 guys. Clearly Brad did it. Or, yup 8 guys. I guess there are a few more people to investigate now.[Edited on May 3, 2011 at 11:14 AM. Reason : -]
5/3/2011 11:10:01 AM
They should have rosemary give closing arguments for the defense
5/3/2011 11:10:06 AM
@BWithering
5/3/2011 11:11:22 AM
you guys, just ignore optmusprimerhe refuses to pay attention to the whole case, just the parts that support his theoriesI figure he's trying to get a job with the Cary Police Department[Edited on May 3, 2011 at 11:16 AM. Reason : yo qfred when did the user tags start auto-correcting, you sly dog?]
5/3/2011 11:15:08 AM
5/3/2011 11:15:49 AM
TAKE THAT BACK
5/3/2011 11:18:36 AM
^^^You can tell that he hasn't actually looked at any of the court documents because he asks for the name of a guy that appears as "Individual with whom Nancy Cooper had an affair, at least during the first year of her marriage to Brad Cooper" which is confirmed by her sister.[Edited on May 3, 2011 at 11:19 AM. Reason : .][Edited on May 3, 2011 at 11:20 AM. Reason : .]
5/3/2011 11:19:35 AM
I can tell this is going to be awesome already
5/3/2011 11:20:22 AM
^^, ^ u right.TRENKLE BOUT TO TEAR SHIT UP[Edited on May 3, 2011 at 11:21 AM. Reason : .]
5/3/2011 11:20:46 AM
I LOVE TRENKLEthat is allI am the love child of Rosemary and Trenkle
5/3/2011 11:21:24 AM
bout to get trenkled up in this place
5/3/2011 11:21:41 AM
5/3/2011 11:22:02 AM
Brad got his share of strange too. Maybe his french girlfriend came over and wrung nancy's neck.
5/3/2011 11:24:13 AM
man, you desperately want someone to side with you on your conspiracy theory
5/3/2011 11:24:50 AM
Oh they found fibers....but no fibers to implicate brad cooper♥
5/3/2011 11:25:24 AM
Cary PD Police Academy Graduate, 2011optmusprimer
5/3/2011 11:26:26 AM
so then brad still isn't guilty...get the french bitch
5/3/2011 11:27:04 AM
like his meter.. like a preacher or something.
5/3/2011 11:27:19 AM
he's like a story teller at the bookstoreI wanna hear the ending of this story
5/3/2011 11:28:09 AM
Might've beenCould've beenShould've been
5/3/2011 11:28:47 AM
5/3/2011 11:29:37 AM
YESTRENKLE IS USING THE LONG FORM "SAY IT OUT LOUD" DEFENSE
5/3/2011 11:30:11 AM
This is my first time listening to the streaming video. Trenkle is the man. There is seriously no way you could be confident that Cooper did it. There are so many logical hurdles that you could convict someone beyond reasonable doubt.
5/3/2011 11:31:30 AM
trenkle is rollingggg
5/3/2011 11:31:44 AM
Ive just been trying to play devils advocate here, but kurtz had me wondering and trenkle is winning bigtime.
5/3/2011 11:32:57 AM
Guess I'll ask again. Did I miss the prosecution's closing statements? Don't they typically go first?
5/3/2011 11:33:15 AM
you didn't miss it, they're last, and i don't know what the usual order is.
5/3/2011 11:33:43 AM
this guy is a good speakeralso, the timeout on the WRAL stream seems shorter today
5/3/2011 11:33:46 AM
Something about the defense's response of something caused them to have to go first. Typically the prosecution goes first.i can't remember exactly what the reason was, but it was covered a few pages back
5/3/2011 11:36:31 AM
Lake Johnson! Watch out CassTheSass
5/3/2011 11:39:20 AM
5/3/2011 11:39:42 AM
well now they can close with some semblance to show the possibility of 2nd degree murder...so they need the extra time to fit that into their close
5/3/2011 11:41:08 AM
5/3/2011 11:41:54 AM
prosecution can go, then defense, then rebuttal... or defense, prosecution, no rebuttal.[Edited on May 3, 2011 at 11:42 AM. Reason : iirc from jack mccoy law school]
5/3/2011 11:42:12 AM
Trenkle is owning every witness that the Prosecution has used.Also doing a good job of reminding the jurors about reasonable doubt.]
5/3/2011 11:42:29 AM
I think it may be because Brad didnt testify?at any rate, hopefully it wont matter, because Trenkle is straight up ripping shit up right now.
5/3/2011 11:42:44 AM
Ok, I'll go back and find it thanks.Just seems like the prosecution always went first for closing arguments and the defense goes last because the defense could refute elements of the prosecutions case - getting the "last" word (rebuttals aside) which would create an innocent until proven guilty bias for the defense. It was just odd that it was reversed in this case.I guess the only important thing is that the prosecution goes first in the opening so the defense knows what to defend themselves against. Guess it's moot who goes first at the end of the trial.[Edited on May 3, 2011 at 11:44 AM. Reason : -]
5/3/2011 11:42:50 AM
i would love to see how the state responds to this shit. they're doing a good job of summarizing the shit show
5/3/2011 11:44:42 AM
i just lost audio
5/3/2011 11:45:13 AM
what happened to the audio!!! I've been waiting weeks for this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
5/3/2011 11:45:23 AM
WRAL FIX YOUR FUCKING FEED
Me too.
5/3/2011 11:45:25 AM
5/3/2011 11:45:28 AM
Y U NO PLAY SOUND WRAL
5/3/2011 11:45:31 AM
same
5/3/2011 11:45:32 AM