I would be willing to seriously reduce all future welfare payments and significantly phase out current payments in exchange for increasing taxes on the wealthy and create a totally voluntary, competitive government health insurance company. There are people out there who are willing to run this potential institution the right way, reducing costs to the consumer as much as possible.
2/13/2012 9:19:20 PM
2/13/2012 10:36:45 PM
Again, I think that's easier to do than starting the whole system over from scratch.
2/13/2012 11:01:31 PM
lets see obama's popularity take another nosedive with $5 / gallon gas.
2/14/2012 10:20:43 AM
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3677#_ftn2Contrary to "Entitlement Society" Rhetoric, Over Nine-Tenths of Entitlement Benefits Go to Elderly, Disabled, or Working Households CBPP calculated 9 percent of federal social program benefits go to people who are neither elderly nor disabled and do not live in a working household. But wait. Seven of those 9 percentage points go to Social Security survivor benefits for children and spouses of deceased workers, Social Security benefits to people who retired aged 62 to 64, medical care and unemployment benefits. In the latter case, beneficiaries have to have had a substantial work record to qualify. Two percent of the total spending goes to the non-working poor who don't fall into one of those four categoriesFor reference, 0.8% of the total budget (Including SS, Medicare, Medicaid) goes to Foreign Aid. 5% goes to interest on past debts, and about 25% goes to to the military.[Edited on February 14, 2012 at 10:29 AM. Reason : .]
2/14/2012 10:26:25 AM
^breaking news: social security goes to people aged 65 and higher. phhhi need to get my hands on an EBT card. b/c why not get some free food and money?[Edited on February 14, 2012 at 10:49 AM. Reason : ,]
2/14/2012 10:33:53 AM
2/14/2012 12:05:13 PM
It sure is funny how a Constitutional Law Professor doesn't know a damned thing about the Constitution. First Amendment, what's that?
2/14/2012 4:28:52 PM
2/14/2012 4:35:27 PM
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_NUCLEAR_WEAPONS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULTwtf, thats a lot.
2/14/2012 9:44:57 PM
How many do we actually need to destroy everyone on land though?
2/14/2012 9:51:38 PM
I'd be truly shocked if we ever used another nuclear weapon ever again. It's mostly symbolic at this point.
2/14/2012 11:11:13 PM
It'll probably happen one more time, but not after that.
2/14/2012 11:14:11 PM
2/14/2012 11:51:51 PM
i agree with pack_bryan
2/15/2012 1:04:28 AM
2/15/2012 8:43:28 AM
2/15/2012 9:07:26 AM
I say we get rid of all of the land-based and air-based nuclear devices and stick to the SLBMs.
2/15/2012 9:07:52 AM
2/15/2012 10:12:10 AM
In fact I'm pretty sure there's nothing more demonstrative of an uninterrupted perspective of white privilege than a belief that living life on welfare is remotely comfortable, stable, or enjoyable.[Edited on February 15, 2012 at 10:17 AM. Reason : .]
2/15/2012 10:17:26 AM
lol so what you're saying is people hate being dependent on the govt yet you insist on virtually shutting down the ability to grow the private sector (which is the only place that pays worth a shit if you work hard and use your brain)lol. it's all come full circle for you now. phhh
2/15/2012 10:46:06 AM
^^,^^^ although i agree with everything you just said, why do you ignore the fact that there are people in this world who simply abhor work?i mean i know people who would gladly/happily sit on their ass all day every day in a blissful stupor and get upset even if they have to empty a dishwasher in their own home.im sure they would love for you to call them mentally ill. is laziness a mental illness then?[Edited on February 15, 2012 at 10:48 AM. Reason : -]
2/15/2012 10:48:08 AM
2/15/2012 3:32:53 PM
2/15/2012 3:35:32 PM
2/15/2012 3:48:08 PM
Out of the biggest welfare program in history: the military.
2/15/2012 3:50:29 PM
2/15/2012 3:53:02 PM
^the private sector. Thanks
2/15/2012 3:55:11 PM
I agree, the private sector is way more productive when the laborers who make it up are educated and healthy, unfortunately the private sector completely fails to accomplish those goals on its own except for a small class of already-fortunate individuals. This isn't about doing away with free markets, but using public programs to ensure the pre-conditions to an ideal market forming are met. For example: public roads make shipping, distribution, and commute times all more efficient, making the entire market closer to frictionless in a way that companies can't exploit from overseas. Likewise, public education saves money for every business that would, say, otherwise have to train its cashiers in basic math. A universal healthcare program removes that expense from businesses altogether and comes closer to assuring every worker is healthy and thus more productive. These kinds of programs grease the wheels of the private sector and fight the otherwise anti-meritocratic lottery of birth.[Edited on February 15, 2012 at 4:02 PM. Reason : .]
2/15/2012 3:59:47 PM
and your assumption is that zero of that would occur if the gov't, specifically the federal gov't, funded or promoted it. something we know to be absurdly false
2/15/2012 4:04:36 PM
2/15/2012 4:14:27 PM
didn't you know? universal healthcare is delivered, free of charge, by the hope and change unicorns (lol, almost said unicrons)
2/15/2012 4:17:12 PM
careful, youll hurt his self esteem. He has it all figured out.
2/15/2012 4:24:33 PM
http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/omb-director-undercuts-legal-case-obamacare/376561ahahaha
2/15/2012 5:02:14 PM
2/16/2012 11:26:23 AM
Aww, it's not fair. Do something about it then. Stop demanding that everyone else pick up the slack for your lazy, privileged ass.
2/16/2012 11:36:34 AM
What am I supposed to do about systematic discrimination that puts white punks like you in better positions than you deserve, at the cost of less lucky individuals born into the wrong family? Wait, why am I even bothering. You're the type who would rather have rampant racism economically disenfranchising millions of people than have government tell a white bigot he can't bar blacks from his business. Why the fuck would I expect you to acknowledge let alone understand how the affects of the birth-lottery undermine everything you value about your idealized vision of Capitalism? Oh dear you might have to actually square off your ideology with reality for once. Never happenin.[Edited on February 16, 2012 at 11:46 AM. Reason : .]
2/16/2012 11:46:00 AM
Pathetic.
2/16/2012 12:02:21 PM
^^ lol you finally admit you have utter hatred for white people for no reason other than blind 'luck'good to know! i hope you get curb stomped one day Str8Foolish = Pathetic[Edited on February 16, 2012 at 12:30 PM. Reason : ,]
2/16/2012 12:21:20 PM
2/16/2012 12:27:19 PM
^stop. when you are born in the projects and not born with white skin you aren't allowed to succeed in life. only white people are allowed to succeed and we they do they should be hammered and bashed to death by those who are born in situations where it is impossible to succeed
2/16/2012 12:35:09 PM
[Edited on February 16, 2012 at 1:03 PM. Reason : .]
2/16/2012 12:37:23 PM
foolish is one step away from the race card. we know where his argument is at this point, hahahahahahahaha!
2/16/2012 1:03:08 PM
The plural of anecdote is not evidence.
2/16/2012 1:05:52 PM
2/16/2012 1:09:51 PM
2/16/2012 1:14:34 PM
2/16/2012 1:18:29 PM
2/16/2012 1:19:06 PM
2/16/2012 1:19:14 PM
2/16/2012 1:19:59 PM