100
11/16/2008 2:08:28 PM
11/16/2008 2:57:06 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/16/us/politics/16blackberry.html?no_interstitialObama will be forced to give up his blackberry and likely the ability to email when he becomes president. He says he hopes to have a laptop in the oval office, making him the first president to do so. I hope he can keep open as many channels of communication with the outside world as possible. Bush has long suffered from being isolated inside a bubble, and Obama seems to be eager to change that.
11/16/2008 3:37:50 PM
I guess I never really thought too much about thatthat would suck
11/16/2008 3:48:59 PM
11/16/2008 5:12:33 PM
Because Fox News is not
11/16/2008 5:47:56 PM
11/17/2008 1:46:13 AM
you know, you can download any video found on youtube.
11/17/2008 12:49:40 PM
^ not easily you can't, and you get the recompressed .flv encapsulated format, not the nice, clean raw MPEG4/whatever format they upload from.http://tv.popcrunch.com/barack-obama-60-minutes-november-16-interview-video/here's a good interview with Obama on 60 minutes though.
11/17/2008 2:41:40 PM
so you're complaining because the presidential addresses went from a rarely-listened to radio address to the widely use and youtube format, but that's not good enough because you can't download them in an uncompressed format? I still fail to see your objections. Obviously, yes, there will always be ways to make government more accessible and transparent, but the guy got hired <2 weeks ago and with 2 blogs and a youtube channel, he is obviously trying to help get his message to the public more aggressively than any other president has.[Edited on November 17, 2008 at 3:10 PM. Reason : .]
11/17/2008 3:05:42 PM
I'm not really complaining or saying it's a bad idea.If if i ran a competing video service like Vimeo or iTunes, i'd be pissed that the legislative branch exclusively uses a competitor as their outlet.I wouldn't be surprised if they do work something out eventually, but if they' dont, I wouldn't be surprised to see a lawsuit from one of the other sites, which wouldn't be a big deal, but it'd look embarrassing.
11/17/2008 3:25:29 PM
Moron, his weekly address is available on Yahoo, MSN, and AOL, and as an uncompressed quicktime movie.
11/17/2008 4:34:40 PM
^ Well good, it looks like my bitching worked (where is the quicktime version btw?)
11/17/2008 4:50:28 PM
jesus. is this what it's come to?
11/17/2008 6:02:55 PM
socialism
11/17/2008 6:04:08 PM
how so? you seem to like it when it's National Socialism ... Ist das nicht recht, Herr Shultz? message_topic.aspx?topic=546260&page=3#12306476[Edited on November 17, 2008 at 6:18 PM. Reason : ]
11/17/2008 6:15:02 PM
11/17/2008 7:03:32 PM
The YouTube Address is pretty neat, but people (other than journalists) will soon stop paying attn just like they did with the old-fashioned Presidential Radio Address.The Weekly Address has been and always will be a press release read aloud by POTUS. Its just a way to let the press know he's still around and to maybe dominate the news cycle if he's lucky (the press are the only ones who actually listen to this shit anyways). Obama's address was no different. It wasn't informative (what the fuck is involved with this "building a green economy" bullshit?). It wasn't inspiring (in a list of what America needs to stay competitive, Obama put "building roads and bridges" in the first and second spots. FUCK ME I WET MY PANTS). So what was it? The usual PR bullshit that people have tuned out for 20 years and will continue to tune out (mark my words, even moron will get tired of checking his facebook page in a couple of years, believe it or not). God Bless, America.[Edited on November 17, 2008 at 8:48 PM. Reason : ``]
11/17/2008 8:46:19 PM
Thanks for your input, ``.
11/17/2008 9:09:37 PM
His first address 1 week after elected and 2 months before he is inaugurated didn't spell out everything he's going to do for the next 4 years!!DAMN YOU OBAMAAAAAAAAA!!!!
11/17/2008 9:14:00 PM
iop100
11/17/2008 9:35:19 PM
About the Palin comments on Africa... the hoax was a fake person claiming to be the source of the story, which was reported on the basis of an anonymous source. The hoax was not that the story itself was made up.NY Times report on it:http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/13/arts/television/13hoax.html?_r=1&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink&oref=slogin
11/17/2008 9:53:51 PM
11/17/2008 11:54:28 PM
agent, I ain't asking Obama to spell out the details of what he will do as President b4 he takes office.I'm saying folks should simmer the fuck down, because the address really wasn't that big of a deal. Maybe, YouTube will give the President one more way to push his agenda. But that isn't revolutionary. It's called propaganda, and politicians have been doing that for years.[Edited on November 18, 2008 at 9:09 AM. Reason : ``]
11/18/2008 9:05:41 AM
11/18/2008 9:52:58 AM
11/18/2008 11:27:44 AM
11/18/2008 11:38:45 AM
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/17/campbell.brown.lobbyists/index.html?eref=rss_topstories
11/18/2008 1:06:07 PM
^That has been beaten into the ground in the "Obama Flip Flops" thread.
11/18/2008 1:29:37 PM
^ how exactly is a president who's not allowed to email suppose to "hear" peoples' voices?He can't depend on the representatives because they are controlled by lobbyists too.He should implement McCain's idea of a European style inquisition.
11/18/2008 1:35:24 PM
^ aye. It seems kinda surprising it hasn't been done already. Wouldn't it be natural to have a Q&A secession at the end of the State of the Union Address? Of course, I don't think many Presidents would voluntarily subject themselves to that level of scrutiny, though. Even McCain would probably get tired of them after one or two.It will probably take an act of congress to make this a continual thing. Or maybe it would require a constitutional amendment. I don't really know the legal implications. The President is already required to report on the State of the Union to congress, it seems like it would be easy to say that this should include a discussion period. *shrug*
11/18/2008 2:21:16 PM
11/18/2008 2:43:13 PM
it was just a word. don't read too much into it
11/18/2008 3:48:15 PM
way to twist his words, `` he's just saying that this is a good start towards the goal of transparency, not the end result.now quit being such a pedant.
11/18/2008 3:50:20 PM
I expect his addresses to be more detailed as time progresses and particularly when he gets in office. This was his first one so it's not surprising that it covered a broad range of things and had less specifics. Give it time. There is no reason to make an issue out of this right now except to be argumentative.
11/18/2008 3:50:56 PM
^ agreeand on the issue of transparency, I do think that frequent and accessible communication from the president to us will inevitably lead to more transparency anyway. I mean, if Bush had given a weekly, video address, available on the internet, no matter what he said, it would have helped people relate to him more.
11/18/2008 3:57:26 PM
Al-Qaida No. 2 insults Obama with racial epithet!http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D94I2RM80&show_article=1
11/19/2008 11:15:53 AM
^Prolly deserves it's own thread.This will definitely help Obama, since he's clearly not "palling around" with these terrorists.
11/19/2008 11:30:01 AM
Wow, a 'house negro'? That's pretty rough...
11/19/2008 1:13:18 PM
'house slave' was apparently the literal translation
11/19/2008 1:37:58 PM
"house slave" was the actual arabic phrase used. Al Qaeda provided their own English translation, in which they specifically used the words "house negro"
11/19/2008 1:54:06 PM
11/19/2008 11:09:13 PM
^ Wow, they are really on top of things over there... it almost seems like they know what they're doing [Edited on November 20, 2008 at 1:39 AM. Reason : ]
11/20/2008 1:33:20 AM
^ @ propogating propoganda, brother.
11/20/2008 1:47:17 AM
these podcasts and videos sound like a pretty cool idea actuallyhopefully it won't end up being a boring rehash of the same shit throughout his term
11/20/2008 7:55:05 AM
this is funny
11/20/2008 9:40:38 AM
it's funny..... because it's true?
11/20/2008 10:03:34 AM
^^ "US to world: see... we're not racist!"
11/20/2008 10:43:38 AM
11/21/2008 9:08:19 AM
well that went on about 3:30 too long.....[Edited on November 21, 2008 at 9:15 AM. Reason : .]
11/21/2008 9:15:39 AM