Holy shit, a few people in this world are actually able to summon their will power and turn their lives around . Nah, not possible.
10/1/2013 5:39:33 PM
^AHA, no, in order to lose a combined 500 pounds in a year and a half, they'd have to drastically reduce their caloric intake--at times to levels consistent with semi-starvation. In order to do this, they had to completely eliminate their (extreme) appetites by following a ketogenic diet (most likely prepared for them by a medical professional). They're lying about what they did, and it's harmful to other obese people...don't you think?
10/1/2013 5:53:32 PM
I actually haven't seen the video yet because stupid iPads can't show it. Will turn on my laptop and watch it.I was only commenting on this:
10/1/2013 5:59:45 PM
A ketogenic diet would eliminate their appetites, even deaden their tastebuds. That's why it actually works for morbidly obese people. They didn't all of the sudden summon some magical willpower they never had before and find a way to live on 700 calories a day. That's a very harmful myth to anyone who's trying to make an extreme change of any kind.
10/1/2013 6:32:57 PM
So you are still saying that it is impossible to summon such willpower. Regardless of what those people did, why is it impossible? Yes, the vast majority can't, but I am sure some humans can and do summon such will power and turn their lives around.As for a ketogenic diet, does it really curb your appetite to such a significant degree? When I went on paleo for 4 months, I can't say I got less hungry to any significant degree during the day as I normally did. I was still snacking as I always have, but on nuts and cheese. Don't know as I only have limited experience.[Edited on October 1, 2013 at 6:48 PM. Reason : ]
10/1/2013 6:47:18 PM
going seriously low carb (a la Atkins induction) completely eliminates your appetitewhen I tried it, I actually had to make sure I eat at least 1200 calories when doing so because I just wasn't hungry
10/1/2013 7:03:32 PM
^^Willpower exists, of course, and it's great. But medically, there are more helpful strategies for people who wants to change things about themselves.And, yes, ketogenic diets eliminate your appetite. The first time, I did it by accident and lost my appetite completely. I was starving/semi-starving for quite a while before I figured it out. Because I'm retarded, I thought I had cancer and then that I had bipolar disorder. And it went on long enough (in such a totally ill-advised way) that I got extra stupid in the head and believed I was developing multiple personalities. I actually started making plans to hide it from everybody so I could avoid medication for as long as possible. It was hilarious. LOL[Edited on October 1, 2013 at 7:28 PM. Reason : ]
10/1/2013 7:28:06 PM
Why does keto or low carb eliminate appetite? Are we talking about in cases where individuals didn't include any sort of exercise protocol with the diet? Or is it because you're eating such dense foods? I've experimented both but I was always constantly hungry, and my explanation for this is that I was still exercising regularly, 5-6 times a week, thus the work increased hunger and metabolism. I can see the opposite happening where you're less hungry if you do less work. I've also noticed this when I was 6 months out due to an injury, I was not eating as much because I wasn't hungry often.
10/1/2013 7:35:48 PM
You fuckers should man up and go on the Christian Bale diet of an Apple and a can of tuna a day.[Edited on October 1, 2013 at 7:37 PM. Reason : ]
10/1/2013 7:37:46 PM
^^I was exercising regularly during this time, but I've never been hardcore about it or anything.^Starvation will also result in ketosis so that is a viable way to eliminate your appetite, as well. Personally, I prefer a bag of cabbage with vinegar and three eggs. I'm manly like Christian Bale!
10/1/2013 8:53:30 PM
^^^ Leptin has play with insulin. When you eat carbs it spikes insulin which effects leptin which effects hunger.http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leptin
10/1/2013 11:11:09 PM
^^ LOL
10/1/2013 11:12:26 PM
i wouldnt just because i would hurt her feelings everytime i looked at an old picture of her and was like "GROSS THAT IS NOT YOU"
10/1/2013 11:25:05 PM
acraw, did you get hungry or were you experiencing sugar cravings while on a low-carb diet? I don't get hungry on a ketogenic diet no matter how much or little cardio I do, but I get horrible sugar cravings and headaches for the first week or so.
10/1/2013 11:30:52 PM
the original post, she looks best at either 175 or 165, not sure which
10/2/2013 12:52:00 AM
^^Could be a little bit of both. The no carbs was more headaches and low energy.
10/2/2013 5:12:43 PM
^^What the fuck? Yeah, maybe if you're stranded in the Argentinian Andes with the rest of your rugby team after an airplane crash.
10/2/2013 6:09:16 PM
Pick your top 3 (or 5), and mention whether ranked or unranked.Unranked 2, 3, 8Ranking would depend on physique of the actual people, specifically breast size, as it can vary considerably.But going with the exact pictures in that collage, ranked, best first: 3, 2, 8If choosing 5, unranked: 2, 3, 4, 8, 9. Ranking them is too difficult.
10/2/2013 7:07:10 PM
what the hell are you talking about, ranked or unranked
10/2/2013 7:11:57 PM
Basic English.Plus, did you even read what I wrote under the pic?
10/2/2013 7:16:15 PM
You could've made that whole post in like 20 words instead of 100if you knew basic English
10/2/2013 7:18:21 PM
Yes, it could have been done more concisely, but 20 words?DO IT.WTF dude this is about chicks and you are giving English lessons???Still, DO IT. 20 words.
10/2/2013 7:23:14 PM
"3 is the hottest, then 2, then 8...then probably 4 and 9"also this thread isn't about chicks, it started as a woman losing weight, then devolved into a huge trollfest[Edited on October 2, 2013 at 7:28 PM. Reason : .]
10/2/2013 7:26:31 PM
2, 8, 3 - ranked[Edited on October 2, 2013 at 8:14 PM. Reason : ]
10/2/2013 8:14:02 PM
#2 favorite, with #8 probably slightly edging out #3.
10/2/2013 8:19:04 PM
2 #2s and a #3 to go please.
10/2/2013 8:24:02 PM
I'm still trying to figure out what a clause is
10/2/2013 8:29:46 PM
2, 3, 8
10/2/2013 8:46:19 PM
I think I will change mine from328to2383 while really sexily curvy, is probably just as heavy as me, or heavier, and that's one thing I hate. Great to look at, but not ideal in bed due to heft, for me. And it looks like it is Kim Kardashian. So yeah, she is too heavy for me.And it is funny that people say I love muscly chicks but I have placed her in 3rd place, but others have placed her in 2nd! I would take her over 3 easily if she had boobs (real or fake I don't care).
10/2/2013 8:50:55 PM
AHA, I thought it was cool you were the only one to pick #3 first when everybody's always joking on your muscle fetish. But, dude, you switched your answer. And before I decide, I'm gonna need to see #2 with her feet not three feet apart and her hip stuck out. She could be a #1 in disguise. Y'all are fucking amateurs at judging women.
10/2/2013 9:07:20 PM
Ranked5, 3, and I wish there was a choice between 5 and 6. But since there isn't I'll go with 8. For some reason "flabby" doesn't do it for me, but "chubby" is great.
10/2/2013 9:10:32 PM
^^ bahahaAnd 2's thighs won't touch when her legs are closed, if that's what you are wondering about And guys who have already chosen, PICK 5, then it gets interesting/difficult![Edited on October 2, 2013 at 9:18 PM. Reason : ]
10/2/2013 9:16:36 PM
Thigh touch is very clearly not what I'm wondering about. But I can't bring myself to explain any more than I already have. I'm already deeply ashamed of my remarks thus far.
10/2/2013 9:28:09 PM
No straight man alive would vote anything but 2,3,8
10/2/2013 9:31:25 PM
Look ranking girls is for preteens. Let's do this the way straight guys evaluate women.0 - would fuck, would possibly date if she was a good fuck and cool1 - would fuck, would call her for rides home when drunk at the bar and no good prospects2 - would fuck, would date, would cheat on g/f with no questions asked, would even pay3 - would fuck, would probably date if she had a little money and/or great personality.4 - would have to be drunk or on a brutal cold streak, would not date, would probably not be friends with5 - would accept blow job if she was cool. Would fuck if i needed a ride to work while my car was in the shop for a week and i was single. Would get mad if she started telling people at work we hooked up.6 - No way. Would let her snapchat me pics of her boobs and might be willing to let her do self degrading things at a party full of friends.7 - Would pay to have her give lap dances to my best friends8 - Would fuck, would date, would probably put up with her a few weeks even if she was withholding until you convinced her you werent just into her for sex. 9 - Would fuck just for the story, wouldn't date unless she got me a lot of free whey protein. Would love to exchange snapchats just to see how big her clit got on steroids.
10/2/2013 11:40:51 PM
10/3/2013 8:07:48 AM
2,3,8
10/3/2013 9:46:42 AM
^^^OMG you are such a mature person... thanks for showing us teens tweens how to act like grown up men and how to treat women. We bow to your inherent genetic and moral superiority in this regard.
10/3/2013 9:59:37 AM
I'm 3,2,8 person. I like my women with some curves.
10/3/2013 10:10:45 AM
i'm more of a 7,6 guy myselfAT THE SAME TIME
10/3/2013 1:04:50 PM
3 & 5 please
10/3/2013 1:16:14 PM
Haven't been to the FB page yet
10/3/2013 5:35:42 PM
This takes YEARS.
10/3/2013 5:45:22 PM
10/3/2013 6:13:05 PM
man, there would actually be more than a tiny handful of women to choose from if America wasn't so goddamn fat....and maybe America wouldn't be so goddamned fat if fatties would just own it and not act like it's OK, or even preferable. I mean, really? #5 is preferred by anyone?
10/3/2013 7:20:42 PM
0, 1, 6, and 7 are the ones with problems.
10/3/2013 7:23:42 PM
i don't even think that 0 or 1 have problems, although I think it would be a little weird to prefer them.I just don't see how anyone could prefer any besides 2, or 3, or 8. There is room for individual preference...you can prefer 2, 3, or 8. You are a fucking weirdo and/or not being honest with yourself if you actually prefer 4 or 5.[Edited on October 3, 2013 at 7:28 PM. Reason : ][Edited on October 3, 2013 at 7:33 PM. Reason : I mean, #5 isn't a troll by any means, but really? Anyone PREFERS this?]
10/3/2013 7:27:59 PM
yeah i dont really dig 4.5 tho... chubby girls can be very attractive sometimes as long as they arent riddled with cellulite.some girls can rock the look, some cant, just like some cant do short hair, etc.just my opinion of course. 0, 1, 6, 7 are just disgusting to me. 4 is an awful picture.9 is a little disturbing, but probably moreso because of that damn female fitness models thread.
10/3/2013 7:30:56 PM
10/3/2013 7:34:35 PM
yeah FL (not far from AL) doesn't help the situation...but unless you're in Colorado or SoCal or a few other places, it's bad everywhere.
10/3/2013 7:35:36 PM