4/1/2013 8:54:28 AM
North Korea is the kid that always plays as Odd Job.
4/1/2013 11:47:07 AM
4/1/2013 12:56:54 PM
Yeah, didn't you people see "The Sum of All Fears?"
4/1/2013 12:58:12 PM
Chances for strategic miscalculations are increasing.http://freebeacon.com/border-patrol/
4/2/2013 1:47:10 AM
This thing is friggin sweet!
4/2/2013 11:08:29 AM
^awesome. is that quote from an article?
4/2/2013 11:57:54 AM
Stolen from wikipedia, sorry.CNN etc have been posting pictures of this thing for a couple days and I had never heard of it before. Went digging for info.I think it's intended to be paired with that Destroyer that they also sent to the region.
4/2/2013 12:13:59 PM
That picture just screams "our country is more badass than your country"
4/2/2013 8:23:20 PM
Sounds good on paper but I see this war as more of a modern day ww1 than another gulf war.
4/2/2013 9:20:56 PM
Why?
4/2/2013 11:11:39 PM
People criticize NK as being backwards but really their military is very strong and close to what our ability was in the 40s. That may sound weak at first but when you consider the terrain and conditions of this potential war it is a nightmare. Yeah we would destroy their large conventional weapons quickly but i don't think they would lay down their arms like iraqis did. They'd fight to the death because of brainwashing.They have had a 50 year head start to prepare for this war. Artillery is dug into several bunkers with mechanized doors to swing out, fire, and go back in. Soldiers also have tunnels and bunkers where they can hide from our bombers and then flood into korean towns for urban warfare.We have struggled with urban warfare and also mountain insurgency against people who have very little training or resources. That is what this war would be like except against many more soliders who are well trained and well-armed. If all went as planned it would drag out and last a long time with a lot of death to both koreas but not the us. The real scary part is China. They could prop up the koreans to make the war go on forever. They will not allow the south to unify
4/3/2013 2:05:04 AM
hey look the NK propaganda corps has even infiltrated the wolf web!ALL HAIL CAESAR the little fat one!
4/3/2013 8:02:41 AM
Dude theres no food in NKI think we'll be okI'm Krallum and I approved this message.
4/3/2013 1:19:51 PM
There's food for the officers and soldiers, just not the other people.
4/3/2013 1:29:41 PM
4/3/2013 1:29:53 PM
so if NK went to war with SK and the US backed SK with CHina backing NK, what would happen to US/China trade? That could cripple the US correct?
4/3/2013 2:00:52 PM
China WOULDN'T back a North Korea initiated war.
4/3/2013 2:05:59 PM
it would cripple china just as much, if not more. we can always reindustralize, but they can't just invent a new market the size of the US. they need us, and realize it too.
4/3/2013 2:12:19 PM
nk going tits up is bad for china and sk. neither wants to deal with the influx of super poor refugees or even worse having to go in and clean up the country after a war. it would be a nightmarealso china doesn't want to see the us with any permanent presence in nk. which is really fine by us. invading nk and then trying to modernize a non-existent economy in a country with people trained from birth to hate us is not something we want to get involved in.everyone is really on the same side of this thing.
4/3/2013 2:25:04 PM
What does "final approval" to use nukes against US even mean? From who? Why?[Edited on April 3, 2013 at 3:39 PM. Reason : I honestly just think Kim Jong-Un is a fool]
4/3/2013 3:38:39 PM
a well placed missile could end this nuclear power plant before things get going.
4/3/2013 3:39:56 PM
4/3/2013 3:40:15 PM
^^^^ x 1000[Edited on April 3, 2013 at 3:40 PM. Reason : ]
4/3/2013 3:40:41 PM
The war has already gone on forever because of Chinese intervention. They will continue to prop up the regime. Allowing it to crash means free market capitalism and democrazy spilling over into china which would be worse by their perspective.
4/3/2013 3:57:20 PM
H[Edited on April 3, 2013 at 10:58 PM. Reason : U]
4/3/2013 10:57:39 PM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/northkorea/9973577/North-Korea-missile-threat-latest-live.htmlFind the humor here.
4/5/2013 9:45:18 AM
North Korea:
4/5/2013 1:02:10 PM
Pretty good rundown of where things stand:
4/9/2013 10:54:56 AM
difficult to read, thanks to formatting, but informative nonetheless.
4/9/2013 12:36:01 PM
Nuke Em'
4/9/2013 2:01:17 PM
not worth nukin'
4/9/2013 2:05:28 PM
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/japan-deploys-antinorth-korean-missiles-in-tokyo/1099818/I'm sure this will quiet down some of the international and domestic bitching about the missile defense program.
4/9/2013 5:49:32 PM
did face write that post?
4/9/2013 8:57:26 PM
So it turns out that N Korea has nuclear missiles. We are doing everything to tone all of this down. Its like a reverse Iraq.
4/11/2013 8:02:27 PM
They have nukes. They have missiles. They don't have nuclear missiles.
4/11/2013 8:04:35 PM
but with a little duct tape and some hard work, they will
4/11/2013 8:11:27 PM
^^Yeah but newly unclassified information (as of today) reveals that they have nuclear warheads that can be deployed in their missiles.
4/11/2013 8:21:46 PM
They MAY have the ability to make nuclear missiles, however, they doubt it's accuracy.
4/11/2013 8:26:41 PM
How accurate does a nuclear missile really need to be though?
4/11/2013 8:55:42 PM
Pretty accurate.
4/11/2013 9:02:37 PM
^^ you at least want to be able to hit the general area of the city you're targeting. Also the reports out doubt it's reliability of the weapon as well.
4/11/2013 10:07:57 PM
Besides, it's not like they have second strike capability. The fire their one nuke up in the air and all sorts of hell will rain down upon them.
4/11/2013 10:33:19 PM
^^ There are questions whether their missiles would even be able to cross the ocean to touch the United States.It's clear also that the Obama Administration, and Secretary Kerry in particular, are trying to dial this whole thing back. I'm not sure if it's because they've lost control of the narrative to the media which is basically hyping this thing into hysteria or if they've realized that they're strategically restraining themselves and are hoping to try and carve out space to open negotiations.
4/12/2013 10:54:42 AM
So with Kerry threatening DPRK to not test missiles... what is the response if they do test? What is the U.S./U.N. going to do? Sound like empty threats.
4/12/2013 10:55:38 AM
4/12/2013 11:48:27 AM
One would think otherwised based on the hysteria... but I was thinking more like Alaska or even just Guam.
4/13/2013 3:10:59 AM
^^Seems like most people on here define "have" as "have successfully tested". They have missiles that can reach the US mainland and they have nukes that can be fitted onto those missiles. Its just much more likely that they would successfully carry out a targeted missile strike on guam, japan or south korea. http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2013/04/world/north-korea-missile-capabilities/Not saying it would work out but Northern California, Seattle, Portland all could be nuked theoretically. You can't assume every missile they make will fail on its first attempt. UNHA-3 would be very much a roll of a dice while Nodong would be certain (unless we shoot it down).
4/13/2013 3:32:49 AM
4/13/2013 9:22:57 AM
well hell, it's going to tip over soon anyway. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNZczIgVXjg
4/13/2013 3:12:11 PM