10
1/8/2008 11:55:01 AM
how quickly our big ten fans forgot that michigan lost to a 1-aa school just a few months ago
1/8/2008 11:57:19 AM
OSU would still whoop Vtech
1/8/2008 11:59:28 AM
1/8/2008 12:00:31 PM
the big east is easily better than the big 10the acc is def better as well, just compare the conferences best teams to one another and think about who would win the matchups
1/8/2008 12:02:54 PM
hahhahhahaTHE overrated state universityi didn't watch this game cause i really didn't care. but i was glad to check it out on msn homepage a few minutes ago and see that osu got spanked...again.i figured this would settle all arguments about who has the better football conference, but i suppose not. i agree that a LSU and USC matchup would have been better.
1/8/2008 12:05:08 PM
The INT was underthrown because Beochman(however you spell it) was under pressure and got completly blown up. Thats why the ball was underthrown. And good coverage is a result of being athletic. And the reference to every conference being light years ahead of the Big 10 was in terms of strategy, and the style of football played. I never said those conferences were better, there is a major difference. The big 10 still has better athletes then the big east and ACC, however, it is getting nuetralized by the style of play and that is really hurting the big 10 overall.
1/8/2008 12:05:45 PM
how are they easily better? They have WV, who's a top-notch team, but other than that, who do they have?^Boeckman has been underthrowing the deep ball all year, so I wasn't the least bit surprised he did it last night. [Edited on January 8, 2008 at 12:06 PM. Reason : INT]
you could say the same about the big 10, they have ohio state and michigan(only counted them cause they won the bowl game), after that who else do they have?[Edited on January 8, 2008 at 12:07 PM. Reason : d]
1/8/2008 12:06:35 PM
big ten teams lost this year to:- Duke- App Stateneed i say more
1/8/2008 12:08:02 PM
Wisconsin is better than anyone not named WV in the Big East. Illinois is a good team (not great or elite, I know better than that. But they're good). Penn State is in the same category as Illinois, except they're on the decline whereas Illinois is on the rise.
1/8/2008 12:09:10 PM
Every conference had bad losses. Even the SEC had a loss to Louisiana Monroe.
1/8/2008 12:18:32 PM
Nothing Wisconsin did this year tells me anything about them. Until Big 10 teams start to play some OOC teams, I'm going to assume they aren't better. Wisconsins OOC schedule was :Wash st., UNLV, Citadel, N. Ill, then they lost to Tennesse in the bowl.Look they might be a good team, but how the fuck do we know? Our only thing to compare them to is their own conference. Give me the notable OOC wins by the Big 10 and maybe I'll change my mind. But you can't build up the strength of a conference just on them beating themselves.
1/8/2008 12:20:46 PM
there really weren't any big OOC games by the big10 this year. ND is usually good, which helps MSU, Purdue and Mich, but that clearly wasn't the case this year. OSU typically has a stronger OOC schedule, but Washington wasn't the team they were when the game was scheduled. Even that game aside, it would have been weak with YSU, Kent State and Akron being on it. However, those games are there to keep $$ in Ohio. The last 2 years, OSU played in the biggest OOC games of the regular season vs. Texas and people applauded them for it. This year was an off year for OOC scheduling, but the next 2 years they play USC, so there's 1 big time game anyway.
1/8/2008 12:25:18 PM
that osu texas game two years ago was a great game...first full vince young game i watched]
1/8/2008 12:32:23 PM
Just because 1 team plays 1 OOC game thats tough doesn't vindicate the entire conference. Top to bottom, the big 10 is always weak OOC. I'm just saying, you can't argue for your conference if there is no point of comparison. I am not going to assume the big 10 is good just by watching them play each other. Here is a good stat for you, 6 of the 11 big 10 teams had 0-1 players taken in last year's draft. I'm not sure what that proves, I just like that.
1/8/2008 12:36:38 PM
you know whats funny? going back and reading the first couple pages of this threadi stand by my statement from friday
1/8/2008 12:40:06 PM
Thought it was a great one, def not taking credit for it.When you are use to being on top of the world it is hard to realize when people have caught up and passed you. They'll get some fresh coaches in and it will cycle around and the conference will get back on track eventually.
1/8/2008 12:45:34 PM
1/8/2008 12:54:49 PM
a 3 point game you can maybe put on turnovers or a blown call, but a two touchdown loss cannot be justified.
1/8/2008 1:17:53 PM
1/8/2008 1:21:43 PM
Yeah but Indiana was a good story this year, I know that isn't justification neccisarily for a bowl game, but it is one of the nice stories that came out of the bowl season. The program and fans needed it.
1/8/2008 1:31:04 PM
^thats why I also mentioned that Ill and PSU are good teams. The Big Ten has 2 (traditionally) elite teams, and then PSU and UW are normally good for top 25, along with a rotating team or 2 in the top 25. The rotating 1 has invloved everyone but Indiana and NW for most of eternity. Now Minnesota is ruling the shitter.
1/8/2008 1:31:21 PM
1/8/2008 1:41:57 PM
but the buckeyes scored first!
1/8/2008 2:16:41 PM
I think if OSU happens to make it next again next year, they should allow the opponent to score in the first 3 minutes, as thats clearly a harbinger for a loss.
1/8/2008 2:44:20 PM
1/8/2008 3:32:50 PM
iirc LSU was +19 going into the game and Ohio State was like -1 in turnover marginie LSU had forced 19 more turnovers than they had lost, and Ohio State forced about the same number as they lost
1/8/2008 3:34:56 PM
yeah, OSU was awful this past year in turnover margin.
1/8/2008 3:44:40 PM
1/8/2008 4:12:56 PM
that doesn't even make sense. that's like preferring to watch a princeton offense even though it's boring and fails against any decent team.
1/8/2008 4:19:55 PM
Yes, there's nothing like refusing to adapt to changes in the game to keep you relevant. Just ask Nebraska how well the option worked for them once they started playing the more evolved, fast, FSU/Miami style defense that everyone now runs. If you don't adapt you die. Teams that are too proud to change inevitably go to shit and then they finally realize that tradition doesn't win titles, talent and coaching do. That's why USC is back in the picture and FSU is currently struggling.If OSU, Michigan, Wisconsin, PSU, etc. refuse to evolve you'll see Illinois in the BCS title game soon.
1/8/2008 4:47:05 PM
what is old school style??setting up the run first
1/8/2008 4:51:30 PM
i love the old smashmouth style...the panthers have had so much success with it recently...cause it still works so well...its not like you have to adapt to the times...
1/8/2008 4:52:35 PM
'08 is ALLLLL about Beanie Wells.
1/8/2008 4:57:41 PM
Tebow will win the Heisman again, Wells will be part of a team that loses to USC by 30 in their second game of the season and never sniffs the title.
1/8/2008 5:03:36 PM
The style of football even goes as far as the type of athletes that they are recruiting, it isn't just play calling. Here is the problem with it, when you do smash mouth football and get the lead, your golden. Problem is your fucked when your behind by a significant amount. 4th quarter down by 14 and tOSU is still freakin' running the ball on first down. It is what they do. In the Big 10, it is a lot of old school football vs. old school football, and the defenses are built to stop that. Then a high paced spread offense comes along, torches the defense, and the old school offense is left down by 21 trying to get back in the game.
1/8/2008 5:43:03 PM
can't say i'm a big fan of smash mouth football; my biggest problem with john fox
1/8/2008 5:47:12 PM
its not even smash mouth vs. non-smash mouth... plenty of SEC teams still play that way, the majority even...
1/8/2008 7:06:34 PM
It's a matter of an old school coach not understanding that the rules of the game and the increasing skills of athletes favors offense much more than defense.
1/8/2008 7:32:18 PM
what is really comes down to is that the big10 loves 500 lb slavs and polacks, while anyone who is willing to win loves fast, athletic minorities.
1/8/2008 8:16:21 PM
tru tru
1/8/2008 10:10:39 PM
1/8/2008 10:31:09 PM
now thats just harsh
1/8/2008 10:32:29 PM
that is a bit much
1/8/2008 10:51:06 PM
oh I agree with it 100%, just saying it was harsh... so is this:
1/8/2008 10:53:28 PM
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22548680/
1/9/2008 9:39:46 AM
I like how all of you guys are fucking football coaches now. LSU was the better team, that's pretty much it. Not to mention OSU had a fucking month and half lay-off. You guys are making it seem like they're the worst program to every grace the field. LSU would've beaten most anyone in the nation aside from possibly georgia and USC. That said, OSU went 11-1 in a BCS conference, so until they change the playoff format, quit crying. They deserved to be there.
1/9/2008 9:43:26 AM
well, 1. If Ohio State would have lost and just had a month off, you would have claimed "ohhh LSU had more time to rest and heal up, that wasnt fair, Ohio State was rushed" so thats just bullshit2. Its their damn fault for being little bitches and not having a conference championship game
1/9/2008 10:02:57 AM
1/9/2008 10:06:41 AM