when someone is suspended, they need to be warned of their 'wrong doing' first through PM and emailed to the registered email address after they are suspended so that they know what they did wrong and won't do it again when they are reinstated. This will only better the tww community as a whole.

3/2/2003 8:54:44 PM

I think that's a cool idear.

3/2/2003 9:18:48 PM

who are you whining for? jake/joe have made many posts explaining the rules and they are posted for all to see......

3/2/2003 9:31:35 PM

i am complaining because I do not feel that regarcs broke any rules. everything he posted was pertaining to the topic and no more than anyone else has done on tww and not been suspended for. I would think a warning would be appropriate or an email stating the reason for suspension.

3/2/2003 9:38:11 PM

and also, all regarcs did was post offensive material (which actually pertained to the thread topic, plus it was in shitchat where supposedly anything goes). there are countless other threads where people have posted offensive material and not been banned.

3/3/2003 1:46:57 AM

Why do you need two usernames on TWW anyways?

3/3/2003 7:17:01 AM

because 'he' posted the pictures over and over and over again probably.

3/3/2003 7:20:49 AM

if he was banned for posting pictures over and over again, then i can point out two or three people who should also be banned for repeat posting of pictures/text to make threads longer than they need to be.

3/3/2003 9:09:37 AM

do you realize how many people would be suspended if that were the case? how many times has the [no] picture been posted just because someone wanted to post it?

lots of people have two usernames on tww. in fact, many have more than 2. 1 will always be plenty for me, but some people have a plethora of usernames

3/3/2003 9:43:07 AM

TEH SCARLET LETTER!

3/3/2003 11:03:53 AM

Jake/Joe used to send warnings out.....but i dont know if they still do it

sorry bud

3/3/2003 12:22:18 PM

When you complain about suspension, you know you have a problem.


Yep, I had a problem once, but now I'm in the clear!!1

3/3/2003 12:47:13 PM

just go premium

3/3/2003 2:48:06 PM

would it have mattered if it were a premium account? i bet it would have still been suspended.

3/3/2003 4:01:31 PM

yeah they are fags with that shit

oh wait, they are fags with everything

3/4/2003 12:17:59 AM

saps-- being premium didn't help our good friend nutsmackr. (RIP)

i think if someone honestly does something they don't know is wrong they might get a warning, but typically when someone gets suspended they know damn well that they are running the risk with the activities they are engaging in.

3/4/2003 12:56:54 AM

yes i think it would have, jason(nutsmacker) did some seriously hax0r, fucked up shit, so he got suspended justly. i pulled some shit a few weeks ago just as bad as regarcs, normal stupid annoying shit. But i did not get suspended and he did, and its because i contribute money to this site and this guy who has 20 posts and decides to annoy the shit out of everyone does not and deserves to be suspended. which is how it should be, i should be able to cross the line, but some punk who has 20 posts, [negative ghostrider]1!!!

3/4/2003 2:05:48 AM

I'd like to know why posting a picture of an ugly old naked woman warrants being suspended while people can get away with making extremely racist threads. I mean really, people are stupid enough to fight or kill eachother over shit like that and the wonderful moderators are just going to let it go until some shit hits the fan.

3/4/2003 3:20:43 AM

sometimes it is hard to tell whether someone is being straight forward, mocking, or a little jokester... but then there comes the issue of whether it should be allowed to joke about something like that....? freedom of speech, too?

3/4/2003 3:46:34 AM

if you want to take the freedom of speech argument you better unsuspend the regarcs guy.

and its quite obvious that a lot of people got defensive in those aforementioned threads. sure lots of people were just having fun with it, but not everyone.

[Edited on March 4, 2003 at 8:37 AM. Reason : .]

3/4/2003 8:35:54 AM

I dont know if anyone has noticed yet or not. But scrager said he was complaining for regarcs. Im thinking they are the same person. One name is the other name spelled backwards.

scrager

regarcs

3/4/2003 1:41:34 PM

and your point is? it doesn't matter who it is. people have not been suspended for similar as well as much worse postings. i'm just asking for equal treatment for all users.

lets take a look at the Account Policies (http://www.brentroad.com/site_account.aspx)

Quote :

"Free accounts and Paid accounts will be treated identically. "

Quote :

"Offense 1 : User will recieve a warning via email. "

all i'm asking is that they follow their own policies.

[Edited on March 4, 2003 at 2:33 PM. Reason : .]

3/4/2003 2:27:26 PM

well, the point is that if you're the same person, you paid for the second name, and should at LEAST be treated like other paying members

3/4/2003 3:33:17 PM

how about just adding the reason for suspension in their profiles...?

3/4/2003 4:05:13 PM

no shitmikey99cobra
none of us had figured that one out already

3/5/2003 2:03:21 AM

Quote :

"yes i think it would have, jason(nutsmacker) did some seriously hax0r, fucked up shit, so he got suspended justly."

ya damn straight he did.

3/5/2003 5:02:17 AM

free nutsmakr

3/5/2003 5:06:16 AM

yes, free nutsmackr

3/5/2003 5:45:19 AM

bttt

3/6/2003 10:26:18 AM

Quote :

""yes i think it would have, jason(nutsmacker) did some seriously hax0r, fucked up shit, so he got suspended justly.""

i guess, if you call knowing html some "seriously hax0r, fucked up shit"

3/6/2003 10:48:19 AM