then you must also believe that black people are lazier than white peopletrue/false?http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/07/12/the-politics-and-demographics-of-food-stamp-recipients/
6/10/2014 4:13:15 PM
well no fucking shit
6/10/2014 4:15:25 PM
^we already know how you feel about black peoplehttp://thewolfweb.com/message_search.aspx?type=posts&searchstring=nigger&username=F%C3%B8rte&usertype=match&sortby=date&sortorder=descending&page=
6/10/2014 4:18:14 PM
do you?
6/10/2014 4:20:06 PM
lots of white people are on food stamps too.
6/10/2014 4:20:36 PM
^but there are twice as many black people
6/10/2014 4:22:23 PM
does that make my statement false?
6/10/2014 4:24:09 PM
nope, but your point doesn't address the point of the threadif you think people are on welfare because they're lazy, and more black people are on welfare than white people, you must believe that black people are lazierand considering US demographics: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.htmlWhite: 77%Black: 12%they must be a LOT lazier
6/10/2014 4:26:19 PM
^that's a false statement. you can't define "lazy" by one metric alone. it is no secret that blacks have traditionally come from a lower socioeconomic background, which can not completely be written off as lazy. if you think so, you are a deplorable racist. (fact)
6/10/2014 4:28:39 PM
why else are people on welfare, then?or alternatively:why do you think black people are poorer, generally?[Edited on June 10, 2014 at 4:32 PM. Reason : .]
6/10/2014 4:30:25 PM
http://www.snaptohealth.org/snap/snap-frequently-asked-questions/#whoa user sent me this statistic...
6/10/2014 4:32:29 PM
trollthread.jpg
6/10/2014 4:32:37 PM
6/10/2014 4:35:36 PM
6/10/2014 4:41:49 PM
ok let's break this downyour negroid races are, dating all the way back to the beginning of time, despicable. harken back to the days of colonialism: negroids would sell each their own kind to Europeans, who then (unfortunately) brought them to the New World. these negroids became mixed with Europeans to breed our current class of negroid, which is no better than their past brethren. what do we see today? negroids exposing each other to drugs, killing each other...just as they have always done.now then, your typical negroid is a piece of shit, especially the male variety. they have litters of children among several bitches of the species, and abandon them all in order to go to prison, a magical land where there are three free meals a day and all the ass you can rape. these bitches, as it were, are left to raise the little negroids (niglets) on their own. rather than be responsible and, say, not have unprotected sex, the female negroids allow themselves to be used by the males in order to get their own benefit, known as "welfare". this comes in several forms: housing, food stamps, or other such means that allow them to sit home, eat pork rinds, and talk on their Reagan (not Obama) phones to their girlfriend Shawlawanda all day. now you may be asking, "but why are white people on welfare?" the answer to that is "niggerdom." the dispicableness of the negroid rubs off on the lower class white who adapts the fatherless lifestyle and breeds in a manner similar to that of the negroids. we then see a system where lazy whites coexist with lazy blacks, though in a disproportionate fraction due to the inherent niggerdom of the negroid. tl;dr: blacks are lazy and so is white trash
6/10/2014 5:10:11 PM
hmmm, very interesting, forte. would anyone care to respond who isn't generally a racist asshole?not a troll thread, btw. i'm genuinely interested in hearing people out
6/10/2014 5:22:17 PM
Needing food stamps doesn't mean you're lazy.
6/10/2014 5:25:33 PM
^^^ I literally snorted my water i was drinking out of my nose when i read that. lolPeople on food stamps are necessarily lazy, they just as equally could be lacking in intelligence.[Edited on June 10, 2014 at 5:28 PM. Reason : a]
6/10/2014 5:27:55 PM
^^^^
6/10/2014 5:29:17 PM
that was a solid uncle ruckus rant
6/10/2014 5:39:56 PM
^
6/10/2014 6:00:56 PM
forte believes that for real though
6/10/2014 6:03:40 PM
do I?
6/10/2014 6:05:35 PM
Did I miss the Racists Tuesday flyer that was posted somewhere or something? For fucks sake.I fucking dare you guys to post your addresses in this thread and see what happens.
6/10/2014 6:31:21 PM
Better yet, sign your real name to your posts, and have CuntPunter email this thread to your employer.
6/10/2014 6:39:02 PM
Fifteen minute post![Edited on June 10, 2014 at 7:16 PM. Reason : ]
6/10/2014 7:01:40 PM
heeeeeeeeeeeeeeey...
6/10/2014 7:03:50 PM
am I in the soap box?
6/10/2014 9:55:41 PM
6/10/2014 10:00:43 PM
oh thank goodness
6/10/2014 10:08:50 PM
go ahead and explain how i'm trollingno one on this web site knows what that word means lol
6/10/2014 11:22:01 PM
6/10/2014 11:53:55 PM
Do food stamps even exist anymore? Or are the equivalent distributed via some debit type of card?
6/11/2014 12:02:30 AM
They aren't stamps. People still say Food Stamps though.
6/11/2014 12:35:06 AM
if you believe people are on food stamps solely out of laziness, you're racistcan anyone explain how that statement is wrong, given the statistics posted earlier?this isn't trolling. it's called the socratic method: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socratic_method
6/11/2014 12:53:34 AM
Oh do the statistics posted earlier address laziness?
6/11/2014 1:58:12 AM
adultswim, the number you used for "white people in US" includes White Hispanics, but the figures for the racial distribution of SNAP recipients segregate Hispanics into a separate racial category, the same way the common parlance does; a better comparison would use the figures for non-Hispanic Whites and non-Hispanic Blacks in the US from that table: 196,817,552 and 37,685,848Another problem is that you mixed figures from different years: Your population figures were from 2010, but the SNAP participation breakdown by race was from an unknown year and the summary of usage was from 2013; to make the comparison more valid, let's try using figures from 2012 (the latest year for which I could find racial data): http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmkNon-Hispanic Whites (US, 2012): 197,705,655Non-Hispanic Blacks (US, 2012): 38,727,063Average SNAP participation to nearest thousand (US, 2012): 46,609,000Estimated White participation in SNAP in 2012: 20,041,870Estimated Black participation in SNAP in 2012: 15,380,970Estimated portion of Whites in SNAP in 2012: 10.137%Estimated portion of Blacks in SNAP in 2012: 39.716%---The conclusions aren't much different, but it's important to be mindful of whether "Non-Hispanic" is implied by any presentation of data by race in the United States.I'll go ahead and do this for the other racial groups, although "some other race" was not mentioned in the breakdown of SNAP usage, and it wasn't clear whether they counted only people who claimed one race or people who claimed that race alone or in combination (I used the "Non-Hispanic White alone" and "Non-Hispanic Black alone" figures); also, because the SNAP breakdown didn't include a figure for "Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander" I presume the Asian figure includes Pacific Islanders.Hispanics (US, 2012): 53,027,708Non-Hispanic Asians and Pacific Islanders (US, 2012): 16,140,684Non-Hispanic Native Americans (US, 2012): 2,309,112Estimated Hispanic participation in SNAP in 2012: 8,855,710Estimated Asian participation in SNAP in 2012: 932,180Estimated Native American participation in SNAP in 2012: 932,180Estimated portion of Hispanics in SNAP in 2012: 16.7002%Estimated portion of Asians in SNAP in 2012: 5.7753%Estimated portion of Native Americans in SNAP in 2012: 40.3696%Of course, these last two figures are the least reliable, because the difference between 1.51% and 2.49% is much bigger, in relative terms, than (say) 18.51% and 19.49%, when thinking about what the "true" value of those rounded percentages for SNAP participation by race could have been.[Edited on June 11, 2014 at 3:35 AM. Reason : Total (2012): 46,609,000/313,914,040≈14.848%
6/11/2014 3:32:26 AM
6/11/2014 9:22:06 AM
6/11/2014 9:57:44 AM
6/11/2014 10:36:26 AM
Instead of trying to trap people, why is it just not ok to say (if you believe that welfare = lazy) that all white people on welfare are lazy, and all black people that are on welfare are lazy. Why not just leave it at that? Regardless of what percentage of what race subscribes to welfare.
6/11/2014 12:14:18 PM
Why not just say a certain percentage of people on welfare are lazy, regardless of their race. An even higher percentage of people on welfare are not lazy.
6/11/2014 12:17:14 PM
Those are all fine & dandy... I think adultswim wants to be more controversial.
6/11/2014 12:31:38 PM
^^,^^^because that isn't the premise of the thread...i'm not making any initial claim. i'm asking certain people to examine their own, but i always forget most people aren't interested in that.mildew, its definitely a little faulty, but I think people who fit the bill would generally consider welfare to be a leading indicatorand why is anyone afraid of being "trapped"? isn't the point of arguing to change yours or the other person's mind? not trying to be controversial, just had a thought and wanted to explore it [Edited on June 11, 2014 at 1:07 PM. Reason : .]
6/11/2014 12:41:55 PM
so adultswim based on the statistics provided by lewisje, do you believe that white people are lazier than asian people?
6/12/2014 9:04:31 AM
i do not
6/12/2014 9:53:44 AM
Is any one race is lazier than another? Or dumber than another? Or worse drivers than another? Does any one race have worse breath than another? Or are worse dancers or athletes?
6/12/2014 9:59:16 AM
probablyso far only mildew has understood what I'm getting atY'all are way off base
6/12/2014 10:02:26 AM
No, I see what you're getting at. Some people think that blacks, as a whole, are lazier than other races, yet are better dancers and athletes (except whites are better quarterbacks). And Asians are worse drivers but are smarter and more industrious, but ruder.
6/12/2014 10:06:42 AM
[Edited on June 12, 2014 at 10:28 AM. Reason : new page]
6/12/2014 10:17:54 AM