http://thecelebritycafe.com/feature/2014/03/new-california-bill-threatens-orca-shows-seaworldSo after watching the heavily biased, dubiously sourced documentary Blackfish, a California assemblyman proposed sweeping laws on orca handling. I'm fine with a law on animal treatment, if it's based in good research and data, but I find it scary this guy can admit that most of his recommendations aren't based in a real study, and be taken seriously.This happens at all levels of legislation. Some representative who is not an expert in an area can easily be influenced to outrage based on something he saw on tv or that a lobbyist influenced him/her on, then go and write a law based on this. Given modern standards and technologies, it seems to me more policy should be coming from unbiased research groups, rather than political wild hairs. We need to be expanding the official gov think tanks.
3/10/2014 2:44:23 AM
The power of media/propaganda/good storytelling
3/10/2014 2:53:16 AM
Yup, democracy is not a very good system. Also, just about any law with someone's name in it usually turns out being a bad law.
3/10/2014 9:18:48 AM
why do you need a study to decide that keeping wild animals in captivity solely for amusement is something that shouldn't be allowed?
3/10/2014 10:18:50 AM
Shouldn't this be called the Representative democracy credibility watch thread?
3/10/2014 10:58:18 AM
direct democracy is even worse
3/10/2014 11:12:33 AM
3/10/2014 1:05:01 PM
my point is that you don't need empirical evidence to make every decision, plenty can be made with logic
3/10/2014 1:17:25 PM