Taking direct aim at McRory asking him to veto the Voter ID law. Stating that it will result in costly legal challenges and the problem that is supposedly solves simply does not exist.
8/9/2013 10:07:17 PM
Sweet! The way things are going, he'll be serving as governor right along fellow governors Berger and Tillis.
8/9/2013 11:20:28 PM
I predict lots of " Hangin with Mr. Cooper" jokes.[Edited on August 11, 2013 at 8:42 AM. Reason : Wait maybe I'm the only person that watched that show]
8/11/2013 8:42:14 AM
Agree or disagree I can understand the reasoning behind requiring a photo ID to vote but I've never understood what problem limiting early voting is attempting to solve. The reason appears to be that the Republican party believes the majority of early voters are voting for the other parties. I mean, what other reason could there be?
8/11/2013 9:50:42 AM
I would not be surprised if this happened in 2016
8/11/2013 9:56:27 AM
^^ See the link below for more information on state-by-state voting laws:http://www.ncsl.org/legislatures-elections/elections/absentee-and-early-voting.aspxOnly 32 states allow some form of early voting, and the early voting period varies greatly amongst the states which allow early voting. Historically, I do believe you're correct, more Democrat voters turn out by percentage for early voting than Republicans. But I also believe that trend is changing as more Republican campaigns begin to push early voting as a get out the vote strategy (I haven't looked at statewide data recently to verify though).Since you're unable to fathom a single reason why anyone would want to limit early voting, here's one - costs. The longer an early voting period, the more it costs taxpayers.
8/11/2013 10:17:42 AM
The REAL VOTER FRAUD is done using absentee ballots, something the NC GOP has not placed any restrictions on. . . . . http://www.thereminder.com/localnews/eastlongmeadow/villamainopleadsguilty/
8/11/2013 10:44:31 AM
Just think of all the welfare drug tests and transvaginal probes we could administer with all that money.
8/11/2013 10:45:10 AM
8/11/2013 10:51:55 AM
GoldieOP is hilarious Come on man ... You really think its about costs? Really? Lolololol
8/11/2013 12:50:03 PM
Just like the newly minted, Republican-led Watuaga County election board is plowing through with an effort to consolidate all of Boone down from three precincts to just one because surely it's the cost that's involved in that decision..................Ancillary question: Do we know if the tax the parents to intimidate college students from voting was a part of that horrendous disenfranchisement bill?
8/11/2013 1:27:55 PM
"Roy Cooper" is also the name of the track coach at Apex...he's a good guy.
8/11/2013 1:42:49 PM
Haha, I had Mr. Cooper for Social Studies in 9th or 10th grade.
8/11/2013 2:02:49 PM
The commenter above indicated he was unable to fathom a single reason why the GOP controlled NCGA would seek to limit the early voting period other than to lessen the effect of Democratic votes. I simply put forth one, legitimate reason why NC's voting period could be shortened. I would challenge those of you opposed to any such limitation on the early voting period to set forth the maximum amount of time that you feel should be allowed for early voting.I understand I'm in the ideological minority here, but pure conjecture such as,
8/11/2013 2:33:47 PM
Again, for the people who say ID's will disenfranchise people - get the same buses that take people to the polls, load up whoever you think is going to be affected, and get them their ID's. Problem solved.I don't necessarily agree with shortening the early voting period. It lets me get in front of that Democrat that is voting for the 3rd time. Absentee ballot voting definitely needs more scrutiny, I just don't think anybody has any good ideas currently as to how that can me done. People here do, I'm sure, but not where it counts, in the legislature.
8/11/2013 4:51:45 PM
what's it like to live in a bizarro world?I imagine it must be scary, seeing as how afraid you are of problems that don't exist
8/11/2013 7:30:55 PM
8/11/2013 9:18:07 PM
8/12/2013 12:02:20 AM
I could post this in a couple of places, but since it's being talked about in here:http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2013/08/north-carolinas-governor-signed-extensive-new-voter-id-law/68242/
8/12/2013 5:19:39 PM
I still don't see how these laws avoid poll tax rulings.
8/12/2013 5:38:06 PM
I am glad Pat McRory as the figurehead of the "small government" party in NC can use Sudafed and Airplane travel to add bureaucracy and headaches to our voting system.
8/12/2013 5:48:22 PM
Surprise:
8/12/2013 5:54:03 PM
the no straight ticket thing sucks
8/12/2013 6:39:38 PM
Don't forget the part that eases campaign contributions and allows anonymous advertising. Great news for wealthy special interests and plutocrats!
8/12/2013 7:15:04 PM
8/12/2013 7:16:34 PM
i hate people that vote straight ticketfucking sheep
8/12/2013 7:27:06 PM
^ i don't usually call people sheep because it seems pretentious but in this specific instance it is accurate
8/12/2013 7:35:16 PM
Eliminating straight-party voting is just a mechanism to add time to the voting process. If you use a voter guide prior to showing up, then you should know whom you are voting for. I would have voted straight party, but I wanted to vote for Steve Troxler and Cherie Berry (just to keep seeing her name in the elevator). I was glad to see the "tax the parents if their college kid votes" thing didn't get crammed into this or anything of the other garbage during the frenzy.Oh, and for the "cost savings crowd", please tell us how spending $10.9 million in the outlawing of touch screen voting machines is fiscally prudent........
8/12/2013 7:38:56 PM
Meanwhile in Florida
8/13/2013 1:13:51 PM
We better just go ahead and order some more crowd control chains. Looks like we're gonna need 'em
8/13/2013 1:56:58 PM
the no straight-ticket rule is the only positive part of this bill. but that's like seeing a penny glistening in a pile of shit.
8/13/2013 3:24:20 PM
That shit covered penny must be the money savings GoldieO was talking about.[Edited on August 13, 2013 at 3:39 PM. Reason : ]
8/13/2013 3:37:15 PM
hahzing
8/13/2013 4:35:54 PM
What it's really about, and everyone knows it:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuOT1bRYdK8
8/13/2013 5:39:05 PM
Change.org email.....
8/13/2013 7:22:17 PM
http://www.wral.com/cooper-s-battle-against-duke-rate-increases-wages-on/12800948/
8/21/2013 12:58:23 PM
I'd vote for a Cooper/Wood ticket.
8/21/2013 9:04:50 PM
8/21/2013 9:49:20 PM
8/27/2013 6:37:49 PM
9/5/2013 9:42:43 PM
http://www.wral.com/cooper-may-eye-2016-run-for-governor/12855539/^beat me to the news, but here's a link.
9/6/2013 3:07:02 PM
I would vote for Meeker or Cooper.
9/7/2013 12:01:35 PM
Roy Cooper likely has the most name recognition, but I would be concerned about losing the AG post to another Emporer Pope/ALEC puppet should his bid fail.
9/7/2013 4:31:35 PM
Email Subject "An End and a Beginning"
9/9/2013 8:59:57 PM
He's formed a campaign committee so I guess it's official now.
9/16/2013 7:33:32 AM
9/16/2013 9:26:40 AM
I can't vote for someone that is standing behind the inept handling of the Brad Cooper trial, and his office is pushing to appeal the retrial decision.
9/16/2013 5:02:55 PM
fwiw..... Roy Cooper was the one that had the nards to publicly declare the Duke Lacrosse players innocent. Everyone else was scared to do it because the situation was so racially charged and the Durham DA was claiming to have more evidence than he had.
9/16/2013 6:10:36 PM
I'd vote for Cooper in a heartbeart over McCrory. Hell, I'd vote for a biscuit over McCrory. I think either Meeker or Cooper are gonna wipe the floor with him after this past clusterfuck of a year. This stupid over-reaching by the GOP is going to end up biting them in the ass bigtime.
9/16/2013 9:14:33 PM
I've been to the future, and Beth Wood is a better choice.
9/17/2013 1:14:14 PM