http://news.yahoo.com/man-forced-prison-sues-under-anti-slavery-amendment-185542960--abc-news-topstories.htmlSeems to me like he has a legitimate claim and the appellate court got this right. There's a clear distinction between jail and prison. If you haven't been convicted of anything and are only being held to ensure that you will be present for trial it shouldn't be legal to force a person to provide unpaid or minimally paid labor ($.25/hour in this case).
8/11/2012 8:21:23 AM
seems reasonable.i think the more difficult question would be if forced labor could be used as part of a sentence. I hear that's big in other nations like Japan. It seems this verdict implies that it can be, or at least that our anti-slavery laws don't prohibit it. I'm fairly split myself, but I think that if labor is used, it needs to be a part of a valid rehabilitation program to let inmates lead a normal life after their time is served.
8/12/2012 7:15:28 PM
I think work is a positive thing for people in jail. If there were some way to make it possible for convicted felons to get any sort of job, that would go a long way towards rehabilitating. I'm not sure how well it would work for everyone, but it would work for some. But yeah, the appellate court got that one right. This probably wont ever see the supreme court
8/12/2012 8:06:18 PM