Goodbye, First Amendment: ‘Trespass Bill’ will make protest illegal Holy shit, this is for real
2/28/2012 8:10:42 PM
So you have to protest on the street in front of the white house and not on the grounds? Oh, no.[Edited on February 28, 2012 at 8:48 PM. Reason : and for fuck's sake, why the misleading thread title?]
2/28/2012 8:47:46 PM
^"The wording in the bill, however, extends to allow the government to go after much more than tourists that transverse the wrought iron White House fence."come on man. read.
2/28/2012 9:17:21 PM
They are frightened of the coming riots.
2/28/2012 9:27:50 PM
^^god dude. you are a fucking whacko. i really hope you can get some help one day. i feel sorry for your parents, possible (wife?) (gay lover?), and please never have kids.The US House of Representatives voted 388-to-3.. so you get <%1 representation in congress pwntthink about that.OMG BUT EVERY SINGLE SENATOR IS PAID FOR SINCE THEY DONT BELIEVE MY WHACKY IDEARZ[Edited on February 28, 2012 at 9:33 PM. Reason : ,]
2/28/2012 9:29:08 PM
2/28/2012 9:31:13 PM
i'm very interested. several threads ago i asked what kind of car you drive. we'd all like to see what kind of car a specimen such as yourself drives. that is all
2/28/2012 9:32:44 PM
Can you answer a simple question?
2/28/2012 9:34:34 PM
you woke up this morning and got in a car (i assume) if you have one. what is it.
2/28/2012 9:35:51 PM
ok don't even tell me what car. just tell us the mpg's. start with highway since that will probably be higher and you can even brag a little bitor just tell us the range:a) 1-10b) 11-20c) 21-30d) 31-40e) 41 or higherjust put a letter a,b,c,d, or, e[Edited on February 28, 2012 at 9:38 PM. Reason : ,]
2/28/2012 9:37:36 PM
You feel that you know me based on my car, how come you can't tell me what car I drive?
2/28/2012 9:38:22 PM
A B C D or Ejust pick one. that's it.highway miles per gallon.
2/28/2012 9:39:13 PM
You tell ME what kind of car I drive based on how I act.
2/28/2012 9:39:42 PM
ok. i'll make it easier1. 0-30 mpgor2. 31-100 mpgoh and a new assumption. a non-answer assumes 1. is true kk thanks[Edited on February 28, 2012 at 9:48 PM. Reason : --]=]
2/28/2012 9:40:18 PM
Get a room, you two.
2/28/2012 9:52:28 PM
These two guys are adorable.I can't wait to see mass tazings in front of the white house just in time for election night. They'll play nicely on youtube next to the videos of the Syrian government trying to cling to power as well.[Edited on February 28, 2012 at 9:59 PM. Reason : .]
2/28/2012 9:58:27 PM
2/28/2012 10:10:01 PM
and so your non-answer gives 0-30. thanks!answer 1) if 1-15, and 2) if 16-30again. a 'non answer' assumes #1 is true we'll slowly get through this
2/28/2012 10:13:08 PM
2/28/2012 10:15:23 PM
Nobody is getting through anything.
2/28/2012 10:16:14 PM
Did you actually read the PDF of the bill? Basically all it would do is allow them to fine "don't taze me bro" guy, who I'm sure got fined for disorderly conduct anyway. What is the big issue exactly?
2/28/2012 10:21:43 PM
They can hold you in jail for 10 years and fine you for exercising your first amendment right.Nothing to see here.
2/28/2012 10:23:59 PM
Yes, if you have a deadly weapon or the offense results in serious bodily injury
2/28/2012 10:25:15 PM
Deadly weapon is a second amendment right.Nothing to see here.
2/28/2012 10:25:41 PM
If the Gun-Free School Zones Act is ok, I feel like this would be tooIt seems like common sense not to allow people to brandish firearms at the president
2/28/2012 10:29:42 PM
No, the Gun-Free School Zones Act is not okay.Did that act save the victims in Ohio, yesterday? Fuck no.Is the act unconstitutional in every way? Fuck yes.
2/28/2012 10:31:23 PM
Not according to most appellate courts, but alright.
2/28/2012 10:34:32 PM
The constitution is higher than the supreme court. The only reason they get away with it is because we fear our government.
2/28/2012 10:36:51 PM
2/28/2012 11:29:36 PM
1) double postand 2) that ^ completely eradicates your retarded arguments against the 2nd amendment for the past 30 years.
2/28/2012 11:53:55 PM
2/29/2012 12:00:56 AM
I don't think the founding fathers would change much from how it's originally written since 200 years later, I still agree with all of the constitution.
2/29/2012 12:39:49 AM
^^because "assault weapons" are the firearms of choice for criminals in the U.S.?
2/29/2012 12:51:29 AM
No, the government. You missed my point entirely.
2/29/2012 7:13:55 AM
2/29/2012 7:52:07 AM
2/29/2012 8:14:14 AM
We have been the worlds superpower and most successful country for the past 200 years with nearly infinite resources and ability to take care of its citizens and the constitution or declaration of independence obviously had nothing to do with it. Therefore we must change everything about the government because it has obviously failed. Makes sense. YES WE KARN
2/29/2012 9:53:33 AM
2/29/2012 10:30:54 AM
Since all presidential contenders have SS protection, it is illegal to protest at any campaign event.[Edited on February 29, 2012 at 11:03 AM. Reason : .]
2/29/2012 11:02:55 AM
and for some reason he won't say his mpgslol
2/29/2012 12:10:42 PM
2/29/2012 12:46:53 PM
The government is a cancer. When the population begins to realize this and seeks to extract the cancer, the government has to take whatever measures are necessary to prevent that from happening. This is the new normal. This is one example, many more are to come.
2/29/2012 1:06:01 PM
but ows told me it's those corporations and their evil ability to make money and profitsnot the poor govts fault. govt is without blemish.
2/29/2012 1:39:12 PM