http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/health/policy/fda-restricts-use-of-antibiotics-in-livestock.xmlIt's a start.
1/6/2012 12:09:51 PM
xml? really?
1/6/2012 12:18:17 PM
Pasted from mobile. Looks normal on Android.
1/6/2012 12:34:27 PM
great. doesn't work for me in IE. does work in chrome, lol
1/6/2012 12:39:02 PM
1/6/2012 12:39:45 PM
1/6/2012 1:52:13 PM
http://www.motherjones.com/tom-philpott/2015/01/antibiotic-failure-will-cost-1o-million-lives-annualy-2050UK government report estimates that:
1/6/2015 8:43:21 AM
1/6/2015 9:39:07 AM
^^seems like an odd way to spin those numbers. Antibiotics prevent millions of deaths a year. If they prevent fewer deaths in the future they're still preventing deaths.
1/6/2015 12:18:27 PM
The point is, with a more judicious use of antibiotics, we can slow the rate of antibiotic failure, thus possibly saving millions of lives in the medium to long-term future.
1/6/2015 1:34:54 PM
We are so fuckedhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/12004008/E.coli-has-developed-resistance-to-last-line-of-antibiotics-warn-scientists.html
11/19/2015 6:11:50 PM
^^^ the point is that we should be more aggressively pursuing mechanisms that are more robust than antibiotics.And there's a difference between using antibiotics because it lets you cut corners on procedures, and using antibiotics because they're necessary.
11/19/2015 6:30:40 PM
yet again, a stupid government agency is imposing totalitarian restrictions to deny hard working americans a chance to earn profit.
11/20/2015 9:59:46 AM
This just helps motivate us to make more better antibiotics. What time frame do you expect to be reasonable for an Antibiotic? Humans aren't steady state, nor is society, nor are the bugs that are currently killing us. 2050 is a very long time away. Technology growth as of late has been more exponential rather than linear. Such dire predictions will likely be terrible inaccurate and overblown just as predictions in 1980 about 2015 are far from reality. I would argue that due to the exponential growth of technology predictions over that 30-50 year time span get less accurate over time rather than more accurate.I.E. predicting 50 years in 1700 was pretty accurate, heck up until 1850 you could reasonably predict what the future would look for an average person 50 years down the road... I think its pretty apparent that as time progresses that accuracy has dropped more and more.
11/25/2015 3:38:11 PM
https://youtu.be/TZb0avfQme8
11/25/2015 9:02:31 PM
we'll have gmo viral antibiotics and nanotechnology bacteriaphages by 2050.
11/26/2015 1:13:27 AM
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2016/05/26/the-superbug-that-doctors-have-been-dreading-just-reached-the-u-s/?postshare=3471464289168129&tid=ss_tw
5/27/2016 6:16:14 AM
http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/05/everybody-be-cool-a-nightmare-superbug-has-not-heralded-the-apocalypse-yet/Ok, better article.We still fucked tho
5/27/2016 8:30:26 AM
Necessity being the mother of invention I assume (hope) that we will come up with a solution. Might do some serious damage first though. After seeing my mom deal with a pretty resistant infection and then my daughter get MRSA this scares the shit out of me.
5/27/2016 11:30:38 AM
I remember reading something a while back about how before antibiotics were discovered, there was research into engineering bacteriophage to target and kill specific bacteria.
5/29/2016 1:52:53 PM