12/7/2011 6:45:07 PM
But if it were available over the counter, and teenagers starting using it, how could the religious right keep their birthrate up?[Edited on December 8, 2011 at 12:38 PM. Reason : .]
12/8/2011 12:38:48 PM
I think both extremists sides of both parties of something at stake by banning it. The right can appease their bible thumping rightists.The left can ensure a future generation of minority underpriviledged social spending money grubbing constituents.
12/8/2011 12:48:48 PM
^lol
12/8/2011 12:50:14 PM
What's the current rule on this, 17+ can get it without a prescription? This would make it so 16 and under could get it without one?
12/8/2011 12:50:33 PM
12/8/2011 1:10:45 PM
^^yes[Edited on December 8, 2011 at 1:11 PM. Reason : .]
12/8/2011 1:11:11 PM
^ Something I read this morning implied that the under-17 crowd need parental permission, not a prescription.
12/8/2011 1:33:30 PM
I'm honestly unsure about how I feel about this issue, I'm leaning towards it should be OTC. I mean yeah there shouldn't be a problem for ANYONE to get emergency contraception, however, if made OTC it'd would be a highly stolen item that odds are it would be kept behind the counter anyways. I really hope that no one would use this as a normal birth control method.
12/8/2011 3:33:11 PM
^^ that was a suggested compromise.
12/8/2011 3:41:38 PM
Are 16 and unders allowed to go to planned parenthood for prescriptions? Not saying that's a viable solution because of the 'stigma' going to one, I'm just curious.
12/8/2011 3:44:40 PM
12/8/2011 3:57:24 PM
^ Many reasons. STDs can spread. From what I read it loses effectiveness after many doses, it not good for a woman's system, etcUnsure because it effects a small group, and I feel that group (under 16) should receive some kind of counseling (from a friendly doctor, friend, etc) about more efficient/better birth control methods. I'm not chastising the person for needing the BC or having sex at a young age, however, it's important they're at least educated a little bit.[Edited on December 8, 2011 at 4:03 PM. Reason : a]
12/8/2011 4:02:58 PM
As long as it's clearly labeled that it's only effective in emergencies, I don't have a problem with it. There (supposedly) aren't any significant side effects other than the usual nausea, dizziness, etc.The sexually active 16 and under group is not that small...and it's an important group to protect. 16 year-olds should not be having children. I agree that they should be getting counseling, and they can currently do that without involving parents in most states, but teenagers aren't exactly known for thinking ahead.
12/8/2011 4:22:59 PM
Hmmm...I'm kinda with bbehe. I guess I'd like to know more about the effect of repeated doses of the morning after pill and maybe some statistics about the MAP/STIs. I guess I've always thought it was ridiculous that people needed it so much...we've had birth control pills and condoms for a long time now.Plus, women's health is important, and it involves more than just preventing pregnancy. Sexually active teens need to get their butts in for an exam, not just pop pills the day after they get they groove on. There's nothing empowering about not seeing a doctor cause you're too busy or embarrassed. That's just lame.[Edited on December 8, 2011 at 4:34 PM. Reason : Basically, we need to figure out how to get them to go to the doctor.]
12/8/2011 4:32:31 PM
http://ec.princeton.edu/questions/ecsideeffects.html
12/8/2011 4:48:24 PM
12/8/2011 4:57:20 PM
Well shit, what other over the counter drugs could have an adverse effect? Essentially anything you ingest that they sell at the drugstore could have an adverse effect. So you're throwing away "helping teens not get pregnant" for "kids not dying to thing they already don't die to." Good job!As a parent of a daughter and a son I don't feel the same way at all. Do they check IDs for kids buying cough syrup?
12/8/2011 5:00:46 PM
That was definitely a pretty dumb statement to support this. He could have said something like it being important for young people to have an open dialog blah blah ...
12/8/2011 6:10:03 PM
12/8/2011 7:10:24 PM
i am "pro-life" by most definitions. once something has brainwaves and a heartbeat, it IS ALIVE. no amount of sophistry or liberal robotic bullshit is going to convince me otherwise. prior to that point of heartbeat and brainwaves though, hand out this shit out like candy. something that is not alive is just that, NOT ALIVE.i know some people will insist that life begins even at beating off into a wad of tp, but we know that simply isnt true..
12/8/2011 7:26:50 PM
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/need-to-know/the-daily-need/did-politics-trump-science-in-the-obama-administrations-ruling-on-plan-b-for-teens/12608/
12/8/2011 7:59:07 PM
12/8/2011 8:11:59 PM
From smc's link:
12/8/2011 8:23:29 PM
all forms of birth control should be available for free in every grocery store checkout isle
12/8/2011 8:45:26 PM
Free drugs can only exist if the taker gives up all rights to sue the drug maker.Free condoms, don't most hospitals/clinics/planned parenthoods give them out for free?
12/8/2011 8:51:40 PM
^I'm a proud patient of Planned Parenthood, and they don't give them out for free in Raleigh. They may have free ones you can specially request or if Medicaid or something covers it, but the ones on the counter have price tags.By the way, I called them to find out about what age you had to be to go there (without a parent), and they said that the age of consent for medical care in North Carolina is 12 years-old. I don't know if that includes confidentiality/prescriptions so I'll call back tomorrow to find out.[Edited on December 8, 2011 at 9:37 PM. Reason : ]
12/8/2011 9:24:12 PM
I called today...the age for medical care/confidentiality/prescriptions (without a parent) is 12 years-old in NC.[Edited on December 9, 2011 at 4:02 PM. Reason : ]
12/9/2011 4:01:43 PM
Calm down people. It's not that bad. It's not like he is putting up legislation to ban the morning after pill.Plus, parent should be involved. What's the research like on how policies like this work to inform the parents of what is going on?
12/12/2011 1:10:02 PM
Limiting the availability of sexual health medicine and information will not get parents more involved. It will just result in more unwanted pregnancies.
12/12/2011 2:05:36 PM
He's not limiting the availaility: IT's still available. Plus, he is playing the political game a bit, because he is SURE to catch fire for making it over the counter. I think that it is perfectly fine to yield here, because the real solution to this problem is to educate kids better about safe sex, which of course you can't do because of jeebus.
12/12/2011 6:40:06 PM
Yes, sometimes political games are okay when two or more lives are at stake. Wait, what?
12/12/2011 7:04:00 PM
Part of me thinks this was a planned strategy. They wanted the FDA to come out and rule that OTC morning after is fine (which really it is), but Obama could swoop in and stand up for "family values" to help court that demographic.
12/12/2011 7:06:34 PM
12/12/2011 8:54:44 PM
I was not aware that Obama completely banned the Morning After Pill. damn, thank you for enlightening me, smc!
12/12/2011 10:21:20 PM
I'm all for plan B being available readily for all, but I can't say I honestly know how well the science is established for the safety administering to girls under 16 so I can't say whether Obama's explanation is bullshit or not.
12/13/2011 2:01:55 PM