i heard that they used to talk about how there would be atomic powered cars and we have the technology. what happened to that? we're kicking ourself now because of these GAS PRICES.
4/22/2011 12:03:35 PM
I think that was back when they thought we'd all be moving around in flying cars by now.
4/22/2011 12:28:38 PM
there are atomic cars now... they consume atoms of carbon and hydrogen.i don't think it would be any cheaper to run your car on enriched uranium
4/22/2011 4:19:41 PM
It would be a lot cheaper to run it on enriched uranium. Dumbass where do you think electricity comes from? And $ per kwh it's orders of magnitude cheaper than gas.Now that being said do you think the government is going to take the risk that if a terrorist buys 200 ford fissions they could have enough uranium to blow up a small state.
4/22/2011 5:09:14 PM
4/22/2011 5:11:15 PM
4/22/2011 5:23:03 PM
Keep your faggot shit in chitchat.
4/22/2011 6:12:43 PM
Soviets built nuclear vehicles. I'm not sure if they used electric motors for propulsion or were just portable nuclear generators on a diesel truck.http://englishrussia.com/index.php/2009/03/17/russian-mobile-nuclear-power-plants/#more-2355
4/22/2011 9:33:13 PM
Under heavy energy consumption of an Atomic car during acceleration, will the generator sound like a nuclear bomb went off?
4/22/2011 9:48:33 PM
how did I know this was a HOOPS MALONE thread without even looking at who created it?
4/22/2011 10:44:48 PM
No, it would be like a fuel system with a surge tank ( batteries ) constant speed power generation and rapid acceleration would only deplete reserves not speed up power generation.Yes duke economies of scale but uraniums power density still overcomes any price comparison.http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Energy_density.svg86000000 MJ/kg (uranium) vs 50MJ/kgSo 3kg (a small pellet that would fit in your hand) of uranium would take you 1.7 million times farther than 3 kg (1 gallon of gas)
4/22/2011 10:51:59 PM