2/21/2011 12:00:47 PM
w.a.g.t.d. : (]
2/21/2011 12:01:12 PM
^ beat me to it
2/21/2011 12:01:31 PM
2/21/2011 12:06:34 PM
Go to hell Carolina....
2/21/2011 12:12:50 PM
we got this
2/21/2011 12:12:52 PM
does the technician still do the tar hell thing on gameday
2/21/2011 12:14:19 PM
^god I hope so... why the hell would they quit that tradition?
2/21/2011 12:17:38 PM
did they do one for football too? i thought they did it twice/year (one for FB, one for BB) but i cant remember
2/21/2011 12:19:29 PM
GO TO HELL CAROLINA, GO STATE!This game actually has spoiler potential. With Howell's status uncertain, we might lack a big body inside which could really hurt us on the glass. Let's hope we stop UNC from getting the amount of boards they were getting the first game, then we might have a chance.
2/21/2011 12:33:40 PM
Is this a home game for us?
2/21/2011 12:34:51 PM
We definitely need Howell back. I'll say 75-66 UNC but I really think we have a chance.Should be ~8 point underdogs...
2/21/2011 12:34:59 PM
im expecting the line to be about 14]
2/21/2011 12:36:28 PM
we will have to be rainy threes to have a chance in this game. They are so much bigger than us inside (thats what she said) that we wont be able to do anything down low
2/21/2011 12:37:46 PM
UNC by atleast 20....stop being delusional this is NCSU we suck
2/21/2011 12:43:21 PM
This will be that giant, improbable win we pull off once a season. I can rest happy until football with a win here.
2/21/2011 12:54:03 PM
for some reason i'm expecting a close game. we are just shooting the ball horribly right now (ok, all season), so if gonzalez or someone else gets hot from three it can be a game
2/21/2011 12:54:06 PM
We hang around within single digits most of the game until Carolina pulls away under 4 minutes and wins by 14. 84-70.
2/21/2011 12:54:31 PM
State plays scared again to start the game just like they did in the nose dome and we get behind by double digits early. We make a couple minor runs at the end of the 1st half and mid-way through the 2nd, but utimately Henson and Zeller control the boards and UNC pulls away with FTs down the stretch. Painter fouls out with 8 minutes to go because Howell can't play.UNC - 88State - 73[Edited on February 21, 2011 at 1:19 PM. Reason : sd]
2/21/2011 1:19:15 PM
GO TO HELL CAROLINA!
2/21/2011 1:26:44 PM
Really hope our guys watch a lot of the BC-UNC film and see what carolina looks like when you stop the fast break.
2/21/2011 1:33:21 PM
2/21/2011 1:35:10 PM
If GT beat them by 20 in Atlanta when the thrillerdome was mostly Walmart fans, there is no reason we can't pull one out at home.
2/21/2011 1:37:18 PM
^ the difference is that UNC has steadily improved since that GT game and we on the other hand have not
2/21/2011 1:39:07 PM
^ you're right. Hanging with Maryland at their place for 35 minutes despite them shooting 60+ % for much of the game is not improvement. Coming out strong in the first half and scoring 40 points is not improvement. I agree that UNC has improved recently. Their record proves that.But I expected this to be a meltdown vs. Maryland, similar to what we saw vs. FSU and vs. Duke. We still have a lot of things to work on (team defense, smart shots, etc.) But if that wasn't improvement, I don't know what is.
2/21/2011 2:01:51 PM
^^you're also right. what this thread needs is some NEGATIVITY!!!
2/21/2011 2:05:31 PM
State by 6
2/21/2011 2:06:14 PM
steadily improvedkey word: steadily[Edited on February 21, 2011 at 2:09 PM. Reason : ^^ I'd call it more realistic than negative]
2/21/2011 2:08:16 PM
I retract my comment.But I never said a single word about us steadily improving. I didn't even infer it.[Edited on February 21, 2011 at 2:27 PM. Reason : V]
2/21/2011 2:10:51 PM
Look man, I don't know what to tell you. If you want to believe that we've steadily improved like UNC has in the name of 'not being negative' then more power to you, but just know that it isn't based on any kind of reality.
2/21/2011 2:14:18 PM
2/21/2011 3:07:25 PM
2/21/2011 3:10:45 PM
i dont see how we are going to stop henson and zeller in the post. i honestly wish we played vandenberg more. he is at least good for five fouls
2/21/2011 3:10:48 PM
steadily improved to a 48 pt game. wish we could do that.
2/21/2011 3:16:47 PM
Yeah? And? Did they not win that game? I also wish we could do that.
2/21/2011 3:32:32 PM
Obviously UNC has improved tremendously as the year has gone on. At a lot greater rate than us (in fact, we haven't matched our play and intensity of the George Mason game since that night).Anyone arguing that is just looking to reverse troll.
2/21/2011 3:34:36 PM
I, too, with that cj could goal tend without being called. It would make things easier.
2/21/2011 3:34:40 PM
It has to be hard to watch Henson get away with goal-tending all game long and the second you do you get called for it.
2/21/2011 3:40:18 PM
^^^sheesh, once again, who argued that we've improved at a faster rate than UNC? Nobody.[Edited on February 21, 2011 at 3:50 PM. Reason : ^^^]
2/21/2011 3:41:49 PM
You won't get any argument from me that UNC gets more than their fair share of the calls.
2/21/2011 3:42:09 PM
^^Oh, I thought it was obvious who I was responding to. The guy that facetiously said:
2/21/2011 3:58:25 PM
we got this fellas!
2/21/2011 4:31:42 PM
the women take on UNC @ Reynolds tonight, also on FSN South. come out if you can.
2/21/2011 4:37:13 PM
Their bigs will make us look bad on offense and in the rebounding department.:dancing L:
2/21/2011 4:58:06 PM
[Edited on February 21, 2011 at 5:36 PM. Reason : ]
2/21/2011 5:16:42 PM
We. Are. Going. To. Tie.
2/21/2011 5:23:57 PM
If we start to lose, we should all just hold up pictures of Tiananmen Square, and get the game shut off in China
2/21/2011 6:04:01 PM
lol
2/21/2011 6:18:30 PM
^^ haha, that would be awesome!]
2/21/2011 6:27:03 PM
on to the next one-------------------->
2/21/2011 6:50:40 PM