http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/10/26/nevada-voters-say-reids-checked-touch-screen-ballots/
10/26/2010 3:33:11 PM
Sounds like a clumsy way to rig an election.
10/26/2010 3:44:44 PM
awesome
10/26/2010 3:54:08 PM
10/26/2010 4:14:17 PM
This was identified as a bug in the programming design, where the touch press rather than the release was used to trigger a selection. The button for Reid happened to be in the same place as the English language selection button, so unless you lifted your finger before it displayed the candidates, it would register another button press/touch for whatever was in the same spot.Piss poor GUI design, not a conspiracy. Interesting nonetheless.
10/26/2010 5:11:39 PM
10/26/2010 5:45:26 PM
10/26/2010 6:30:36 PM
I can't get over how we've had electronic voting machines, an in general computers and touch screen technology for over a decade now and the damn vendors still can't get it right. Is it about time the state and local governments just commission Apple to make their voting machines?
10/26/2010 7:04:27 PM
No matter how idiot proof you make something, there will always be a bigger idiot. Sometimes I almost think we should have nothing but write in voting, if you aren't aware enough of the candidates to know who's name to write in, that's your problem. Of course, someone would still fuck that up, and we'd have debates over whether someone wrote one name or another.
10/26/2010 8:28:32 PM
You only think you are free.
10/26/2010 9:34:16 PM
these are easily conspiracies of the left. if bush's/gore's/kerry's election issues were conspiracies, so are these.
10/26/2010 9:51:57 PM
If you are too stupid to deal with mechanical or programming glitches you shouldn't be voting. The machine doesn't do what you want it to you call for help. Fucking idiots.
10/27/2010 7:47:57 AM
you shouldn't have to call for help on account of the machine doing the exact opposite of what you told it to do. I'm just sayin...
10/27/2010 8:07:56 AM
10/27/2010 10:09:00 AM
Instead of less information on the ballot, they should put more. They're electronic, so they could have much more information on each candidate. Put generic policy questions and a 1 line statement from the candidate why they should be elected.
10/27/2010 10:16:04 AM
^ Well, we can't even get the candidates names right (Rich Whitney turned into "Rich Whitey"). Imagine trying to get entire sentences right.
10/27/2010 10:35:35 AM
10/27/2010 10:36:40 AM
^^hahahahahahahahahaha[Edited on October 27, 2010 at 10:40 AM. Reason : ^^]
10/27/2010 10:38:15 AM
^^I'd vote for an idiot over Harry Reid too.
10/27/2010 12:50:43 PM
I worked as chief judge at several polling places in the past few years, lastly for the previous presidential election. I can tell you that there are some really dumb people that vote. Wake County has a touch screen voting machine that is supposed to assist disabled voters, but more often than not, I was having to tell them "You want to vote for Obama? Put your finger here, and push." Literally. People dont get technology as a whole.
10/27/2010 1:06:13 PM