What do you see more of:-black or other people of minoritiy races at tea parties -white people at the NAACP meetingsDo the democrats want the colored people from the naacp as auto votes, or leaders? the tea party wants them as leaders, like alan west. where are the new black democrats, or are they only allowed to vote for their white leaders?http://townhall.com/columnists/MichelleMalkin/2010/07/14/the_national_association_for_the_advancement_of_coddled_peoplehttp://townhall.com/columnists/DougGiles/2010/07/17/andrew_breitbart_to_naacp%E2%80%99s_ben_jealous_go_to_hell!
7/18/2010 11:37:36 AM
they are different organizations.one is a political party and the other is an advocacy group. i dont understand the comparing of the demographics of the two.[Edited on July 18, 2010 at 11:56 AM. Reason : .]
7/18/2010 11:55:17 AM
I see the Tea Party as an advocacy group, not as a political party (even though they do have "Party" in their name). They organize and advocate for changes in Washington, mainly to push the conservative agenda, they protest the Democrats, and they really aren't organized enough to do much beyond protesting. They are, mostly a grassroots movement. Until they formally organize and join together as a whole, I can't take them seriously as an actual party. Until they get to the point that they nominate a presidential candidate, I don't see them as a party.While I do agree that the NAACP and the Tea Party are different, they are still advocacy groups. What they advocate though, are different.
7/18/2010 1:19:09 PM
7/18/2010 2:37:52 PM
do you even know anything about the black tea party leaders or are you just trying to avoid what i said?the old guard taht you posted is on the way out. who are the new black democrats?
7/18/2010 3:06:17 PM
did you hear about the south carolina democrats? a new young black candidate tried to run for senate that wasnt a part of the naacp democrat crowd. he wanted fewer taxes, more jobs, and to end the regulation and union problem. and what did they do? tried to kick him off the ballot for "approved" candedates, a white guy, which is better than a black that wont support their naacp believes. you are not allowed to be for less government according to democarts if youe black?
7/18/2010 3:11:54 PM
DaBird, the Tea Party movement isn't exactly a political partyAnyway a better comparison may be the civil-rights movement vs. the tea-party movement, or perhaps between the NAACP and FreedomWorks, two organizations well-known in their respective movements; for the first comparison it should be noted that Mark Potok of the SPLC is a prominent white man in the anti-hate wing of the civil-rights movement, although I am not sure more generally how widespread white people are in the movement, especially that portion more concerned about race than gender, sexual orientation, or gender identity and expression.[Edited on July 18, 2010 at 4:41 PM. Reason : ^Sadly the extreme preference of blacks for the Democrats gives off that impression
7/18/2010 4:40:03 PM
ok fair enough. it is an aspiring political party and therefore much different than the NAACP.
7/18/2010 5:06:42 PM
I don't think the Tea Party movement is an aspiring political party, either.I always thought it was a decentralized advocacy group, (and therefore [still] much different than the NAACP.)Also, does the NAACP accept public funds? If so....[Edited on July 18, 2010 at 5:19 PM. Reason : ]
7/18/2010 5:18:39 PM
Tea Party Express leader Mark Williams expelled over 'Colored People' letter
7/18/2010 5:34:13 PM
to be fair, the "niggar" sign isn't racist. it's just in horribly bad taste. and I mean horribly bad tasteyou should also note that he was kicked out of the event for that sign. wow, sure sounds like that Tea Party is harbouring and promoting racism, doesn't it?also, the Tea Party express guy is classless. way to go, asshat[Edited on July 18, 2010 at 8:15 PM. Reason : ]
7/18/2010 8:03:57 PM
^I agree that the sign isn't racist. In fact, I'm a little miffed by people's reactions to it because, in my opinion, the fact that he wrote and carried that sign may indicate that he's less racist than most.It's possibly stupid, extreme, offensive, and insensitive to apply that term to a taxpayer in today's world. But, at the same time, he's showing that he understands a bit about what it means to be the nigger: a victim of prejudice similar to that suffered by blacks; a person who is economically, politically, or socially disenfranchised. If he really feels like the nigger, I don't think he's racist for saying so.Again, stupid, extreme, offensive, and insensitive, but not racist...
7/18/2010 9:10:14 PM
my god, bridget and I agree. anybody got a temperature reading from Hell?
7/18/2010 10:07:04 PM
7/18/2010 10:11:18 PM
and your point would be...
7/18/2010 10:46:48 PM
how many non-racists do you know that call a slave a "niggar"you can marginalize it all you want, but that sign is racist[Edited on July 18, 2010 at 11:49 PM. Reason : .]
7/18/2010 11:37:46 PM
Good point. I honed in on the N-word and didn't pay attention to the "slave owner" prompt. I still think you could technically interpret that in a non-racist way.I'm just having trouble believing that hardcore racist would just totally out themselves by racistly tossing the N-word on a sign and parading around with their face out in front of cameras...But, from his own website...
7/19/2010 12:23:10 AM
You have to figure that the election of the first black president is going to bring these people out of the woodwork...It's commendable though you would give people the benefit of the doubt that they legitimately care about the issues, and not race.
7/19/2010 1:28:26 AM
Biden says tea party not a racist movement(AP) – 14 hours ago
7/19/2010 5:58:49 AM
The people within the tea party trying to use race in any way to make their point are f'ing idiots and distract from the many good things they stand for. Very frustrating.
7/19/2010 9:02:26 AM