6/2/2010 6:02:42 PM
If I had money, I tell you what I'd do.I wouldn't buy a mercury.[Edited on June 2, 2010 at 6:11 PM. Reason : .]
6/2/2010 6:10:14 PM
good riddanceand OLD
6/2/2010 6:23:42 PM
merc is now is the subtle car between the flashy new ford designs and the over the top grills of the Lincoln... i think they had the oldest average buyer of any car out there.
6/2/2010 6:33:06 PM
It's about time.
6/2/2010 6:37:31 PM
nothing decent since the marauder anyway
6/2/2010 7:26:56 PM
It's frustrating to see the domestic automakers calling it in for some of their brands for decades and then wondering why sales decline. Chysler did it with Plymouth, GM with Oldsmobile and Ford with Mercury.Shameful.Regardless, it doesn't matter anymore.
6/2/2010 9:23:31 PM
^pontiac too
6/2/2010 9:38:38 PM
Pontiac was a victim of the recession. Pontiac actually had unique models (G6, G8, Solstice [differed enough in appearance from the Sky])
6/2/2010 10:11:21 PM
wait...pontiac is gone?lol
6/2/2010 10:34:49 PM
Sky > Solstice
6/2/2010 10:44:30 PM
They need to bring back Edsel.
6/2/2010 10:46:12 PM
6/3/2010 12:02:27 AM
those brands were big when US automakers had a very large market share
6/3/2010 1:19:35 AM
It provided the illusion of choice to consumers.
6/3/2010 1:32:44 AM
^ consumers are dumbwhich i realize you aren't disputing
6/3/2010 8:07:02 AM
6/3/2010 9:38:26 AM
Dont think its accurate for Saturn either
6/3/2010 9:41:52 AM
Yea man, mercury did a great job of sucking down extra business overhead and canabalizing sales from other ford brands. Why in the world would they want to shut it down>??!?!?!
6/3/2010 9:44:10 AM
^^Eh, GM didn't need a new car company to shake their image problem. GM never made money off Saturn. It was a dumb idea and was flawed by some of the most bland car designs ever seen.
6/3/2010 10:12:10 AM
The point is Saturn never was created or intended to market rebranded vehicles.
6/3/2010 10:22:09 AM
yes Saturn was independent for a few years until the corporate assclowns took over and just gave them rebadged Chevy models
6/3/2010 10:43:00 AM
Saturns had some serious fans/brand loyalists.I think it was a great idea, from a marketing perspective. GM fucked it up because they didn't give it the attention it needed. Too many other BS brands to breast-feed.Mercury, on the other had, should have gone away 40 years ago. How long has it been since badge engineering was a good idea?
6/3/2010 11:41:01 AM
^^^quite true.
6/3/2010 11:42:48 AM
6/3/2010 11:48:55 AM
good riddance.This will be good for a resurging Ford. They're finally making cars that people want to drive, and the timing is excellent considering Honda and Toyota are making more and more generic looking cars, and both have had reliability issues.
6/3/2010 8:46:03 PM
^^thing for me was, I never saw the point in buying a new Saturn when you could buy a used Honda.
6/3/2010 10:20:05 PM
6/3/2010 10:33:12 PM
though i agree with this from the business standpoint, it kills the possibility of a future marauder... which makes me RIP Mercury
6/3/2010 10:54:07 PM
people were loyal to Saturn because of the 90s models that were tanks. then Saturn started to get rebadged crap and it took a little while for people to figure that out
6/4/2010 3:18:37 PM
6/4/2010 3:27:24 PM
^The Saturn engines were notorious for horrible NVH ratings. I suppose some people don't care about that but even for a used car I'd rather have a Honda with a jewel of an engine over a Saturn. But I understand to each his own.
6/4/2010 3:41:25 PM
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_16aEfR-4HkE/SirdWtW4-BI/AAAAAAAAAAc/qivessYd5AA/s1600-h/Capri_03.jpg[Edited on June 4, 2010 at 3:49 PM. Reason : u]
6/4/2010 3:48:55 PM
6/6/2010 12:36:46 AM
6/9/2010 4:50:22 PM