These are worse than the Lisa Simpson blow job logo.[Edited on May 19, 2010 at 7:38 PM. Reason : .]
5/19/2010 7:36:59 PM
LOL Tony K said they looked like their faces were toilet seats[Edited on May 19, 2010 at 7:39 PM. Reason : .]
5/19/2010 7:38:53 PM
They need to take lessons from the USA and South Africa.1984 LA Olympic Games2010 FIFA World Cup[Edited on May 19, 2010 at 7:45 PM. Reason : .]
5/19/2010 7:45:15 PM
5/19/2010 7:49:06 PM
^Lame!
5/19/2010 7:50:18 PM
So after doing a little research, Atlanta didn't do much better in 1996 with Izzy.
5/19/2010 8:51:55 PM
5/19/2010 9:22:42 PM
^You would think they would use a more traditional symbol like LA 1984 and South Africa 2010.
5/19/2010 9:26:05 PM
teletubbies.everybody knows the brits will put on the gayest show on earth. and they have to follow china who put on the best olympics of all time.good lord.
5/19/2010 9:27:52 PM
5/19/2010 9:31:43 PM
who gives a shit?they weren't made for anybody over the age of 6 anyways
5/19/2010 9:33:06 PM
^Well this is a sports forum, the Olympics are a big event, and there have been better mascots and logos used for major sporting events in the past. Poor job by London so far.
5/19/2010 9:39:33 PM
This is a shame. Why not Robin Hood, or Elizabeth Hurley?
5/19/2010 9:43:16 PM
This was their mascot for the 1966 FIFA World Cup who was named Willie. They could have done something like this.
5/19/2010 10:42:12 PM
5/19/2010 10:44:17 PM
Big problems for small minds ITT
5/19/2010 10:44:27 PM
Maybe Izzy is related to jackovasaurus?[Edited on May 19, 2010 at 10:48 PM. Reason : .]
5/19/2010 10:47:41 PM
god save the queen[Edited on May 19, 2010 at 10:59 PM. Reason : ]
5/19/2010 10:51:52 PM
5/19/2010 11:11:14 PM
Here they are from a different angle: One has that perpetual menacing look, the other a perpetual please don't hurt me look.This one eyed monster was cooler:[Edited on May 20, 2010 at 8:29 AM. Reason : -]
5/20/2010 8:07:26 AM
Man, I hope they don't get much TV time or use...they look despicable III
5/20/2010 8:27:42 AM
It looks like the one on the right pissed his pants. Why is his crotch highlighted in blue. Seriously do they put any effort at all in designing these things?
5/20/2010 9:05:46 AM
Heard on NPR this morning that the mascots were supposed to be symbolic of the growing popularity of webcams....to take away from the view that London spies on everyone with cameras all over the city....WTF??
5/20/2010 9:17:19 AM
Here is a link that explains them. Last night I read that there is a company that got paid $800,000 to design these and I think they also designed Izzy for the 1996 games.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/olympics/london2012/7744654/London-2012-Olympic-mascots-Wenlock-and-Mandevilles-design-features-explained.html
5/20/2010 11:22:37 AM
^Those explanations sound like a 5th grade art project.[Edited on May 20, 2010 at 11:32 AM. Reason : or is that the point?]
5/20/2010 11:25:49 AM
Still Gay looking....Maybe the kiddies will like. Bunch of stone heads will luv it III
5/20/2010 1:03:14 PM
^^^^ yeah Im going with security cameras, except these can actually follow you around and give you high fives and stuff.
5/20/2010 1:17:34 PM
5/20/2010 1:51:36 PM
5/20/2010 1:53:20 PM
Yes, this is horrible, this idea.
5/20/2010 1:57:13 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_2012_Olympics#MascotsOk, so I was wrong. They were designed by a British Author who writes childrens liturature.[Edited on May 20, 2010 at 2:02 PM. Reason : .]
5/20/2010 2:01:53 PM
5/21/2010 9:34:46 AM
^LOL!
5/21/2010 11:03:22 AM
speaking of one eye'd monsters....
5/21/2010 1:58:12 PM
5/21/2010 3:08:58 PM