what the HELL were you thinking (note, this is just the PAGE HEADER):when your page header is LONGER THAN THE PAGE CONTENT, something's wrong. i thought it was just something NCSU did in their implementation (which wouldn't surprise me in the least, considering their less-than-stellar UIs in the past), but it's like this on every single PS implementation i've ever seen.why the hell would you put THAT MUCH JAVASCRIPT and THAT MUCH CSS (badly formed CSS, at that) in a page header? hell, why even put plain CSS/JS in a header anyway?also note that it seems to include JS that helps with page editing and whatnot even though i don't have editing privs... why return that much crap if you don't have to?this honestly doesn't surprise me at all, considering how absolutely horrible i've discovered that peoplesoft is through my attempts to get something to even parse the crap it outputs... and their laughable use of AJAX (when you click a button, you get a little hidden span that says "Processing...", but the page actually submits a form whenever you do ANYTHING)i want to punch this in the face. why would ANYONE ever use this shit?[Edited on May 11, 2009 at 7:19 AM. Reason : i'm sure everyone at oracle reads TWW]
5/11/2009 7:15:48 AM
this looks like a job for return false!
5/11/2009 8:18:18 AM
oh noes! oracle's __________ is bloated!
5/11/2009 9:59:05 AM
Dear customer,Please update to PeopleTools 8.49 and we *promise* it'll be fixed. Sincerely,Oracle Support
5/11/2009 11:00:30 PM
*promise* being the operative word
5/12/2009 1:36:25 AM
I just sort of scrolled to the middle of it and started looking around, but...
5/12/2009 3:37:54 AM
uh.....that function is to convert the arabic calendar to julian.It very well could be needed, especially to convert an old date to our format.Do you even have a slight clue as to what you're talking about?
5/12/2009 8:45:42 AM
soa single spacewasn't good enough?youhadto doublespace?
5/12/2009 8:55:45 AM
I've always double spaced. It makes it easier to read.So what's your fuckin point?ps: can't troll a troll.
5/12/2009 10:24:07 AM
not trollingasking a serious question. just curious. sheesh.
5/12/2009 12:16:06 PM
5/12/2009 12:58:17 PM
^^ message_section.aspx?section=9^ Yeah, it shouldn't be in the header, but I think what kiljadn was getting at was that you totally misunderstood the purpose of the function.
5/12/2009 1:04:38 PM
It was a joke dude...Didn't you see the part where they were like "Just Kidding"?
5/12/2009 1:04:47 PM
5/12/2009 5:09:48 PM
Speaking of antiquated datetime formats... WTF is up with people still using "AM" and "PM" clocks, and writing dates anything other than YYYY-MM-DD (ISO 8601)??And WTF is up with Time Zones? If governments find it necessary to change around DST, we should just think in terms of UTC.
5/12/2009 5:27:49 PM
so, in summary:pwnt.
5/12/2009 5:41:44 PM
5/13/2009 1:22:07 AM
What in the fuck christ are you talking about?I've never even fucking posted in that thread, nor does it discuss double spacing for readability.Are you fucking retarded?My "So in summary" post was regarding philihp's tongue-in-cheek sarcasm, questioning why anyone uses anything but EST and the gregorian calendar.I was in effect, validating what he said.You can't be this bloody dense.[Edited on May 13, 2009 at 1:39 AM. Reason : .]
5/13/2009 1:37:05 AM
Christ, you people are about as literal as it gets. How do you have conversations in the real world without the other person strangling you?Of course I realize that different time measurements exist in the world, who the fuck doesn't?It's why I talked about the date formatting being simple and not date conversion (though I do believe I mentioned unit conversion being unnecessary in a basic format/date display... which it is).Obviously you would need a time/date conversion method in anything that would actually deal with the issue (international sites with selectable date format styles, for example). But in a page header, which is the premise of the fucking thread, no we do not.
5/13/2009 1:57:51 AM
this is probably the worst thread we've ever had in tech talk.
5/13/2009 2:00:46 AM
5/13/2009 2:15:39 AM
^^i never expected it to turn out like this.it's like i forgot i was on TWW for a second.*sigh*
5/13/2009 7:25:54 AM
5/13/2009 9:51:36 AM
i wonder how this thread got off track ]
5/13/2009 10:08:01 AM
For the record, I don't think this was even a thread worthy topic to begin with.The number of huge companies who put poorly formed shit in their page headers for web applications greatly outweighs the number of them that post on TWW or give a fuck what we think about it.
5/13/2009 10:15:31 AM
^^^There's something I like to call a "premise".The "premise" is the statement upon which all following statements are based.(Also, there's something I like called "condescension", and I'm using it on you)I figured that it would be obvious enough that since the original post was about a bloated page header (bloated oracle web applications in general), and that since the particular code was an excerpt from the page header, that anyone reading it would have the sense to understand that such a premise exists. It did not seem necessary to add "to a page header" at the end of all of my sentences, because I figured it would be very obviously implied. Clearly not, however.Next time I am in tech talk, I will remember to add explicit qualifications to every fucking thing I say to satisfy your gross level of anal retention.
5/13/2009 12:08:06 PM
Since we're driving this into the ground...
5/13/2009 12:19:29 PM
^^SO TUFF CONDESCENDING GTFO kid, you fucking lost. Horribly.
5/13/2009 12:27:35 PM
^^
5/13/2009 12:27:50 PM
YOU GOD DAMNED RIGHT
5/13/2009 12:39:21 PM
5/13/2009 12:46:06 PM
PRECISELY
5/13/2009 12:52:25 PM
This is why I prefer hardware over software, physics is pure and absolute, software = way too many different interpretation of the same thing.
5/13/2009 1:12:15 PM
MUH MUH BUH FUBU SAKLW VOCXIAO WD BPDSOIfree post in tech talk
5/13/2009 1:55:31 PM
pad
5/13/2009 2:01:53 PM