Post your responses, opinions, etc.[Edited on February 9, 2009 at 8:08 PM. Reason : Is anyone else even watching this?]
2/9/2009 8:01:11 PM
I'm away from the TV. But let me guess..."the notion that""the same failed policies of the last 8 yrs""only the government""crisis""catastrophe""let me be clear""uh"
2/9/2009 8:14:27 PM
"that's not a number that I plucked out of..........uhhh.....a hat"nice save
2/9/2009 8:23:14 PM
2/9/2009 8:28:06 PM
"i hate when people say there's pork in this bill...i know there are things that shouldn't be there and should be in another bill"
2/9/2009 8:28:48 PM
this seems like some heavily scripted propaganda with some mediocre ad-libbing going on"OMG!! We still use paper and write notes down!! We live in the stone age!!"
2/9/2009 8:29:51 PM
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/business/sfl-0209-obamaecon,0,4026446.story
2/9/2009 8:34:17 PM
1) He sounds like he is still debating2) Using less paper will cut back on those in the pulp and paper industry3) I think the problem is not necessarily with the government, but those who do nothing and expect the government to bail them out (ie food stamps, welfare, etc etc.) Not to say that sometimes these things are needed, because let's face it, things do come up, but seriously...let me buy a $50,000+ car with a $30,000/yr job. Please!!!Just my two cents...
2/9/2009 8:35:37 PM
2/9/2009 8:37:17 PM
^^ I feel bad for the "beating laundry against a rock" industry because of the washing machine industry
2/9/2009 8:43:51 PM
^^^ well, your $0.02 is a shitty analysis of what's going on. your screen name is an embarrassment
2/9/2009 8:46:19 PM
"Paakistan"
2/9/2009 8:50:28 PM
Someone wasted a questin on baseball???Really?Really?Are we going to have the Open Obama Forum every month?
2/9/2009 8:51:17 PM
2/9/2009 8:54:14 PM
^^ ha 1) i was expecting some laughter from the press, but no....2) watch it again and you will see in the final split-second before it went to Obama, Chuck Todd was sitting behind the questioner and he gave a big "WTF? Are you serious?" face
2/9/2009 8:58:14 PM
DudeWhen you motion for "high standards"You motion above your headNot below your chinGeez...wait to motivate the American people and be the "Eternal Optimist"...
2/9/2009 9:01:48 PM
agentlion, your mom was an embarrassmentPeople in general need to take a greater responsibility for what they can control. For those that can't, yes we should help them.[Edited on February 9, 2009 at 9:23 PM. Reason : asg]
2/9/2009 9:20:57 PM
I had it to turn it because it takes him so long to answer the fucking questions.... I decided I would just wait and read the stories/recap of it later
2/9/2009 10:07:10 PM
2/10/2009 2:04:23 AM
2/10/2009 3:32:27 AM
2/10/2009 9:52:35 AM
2/10/2009 10:21:18 AM
whatever dude, if you're denying that he's long-winded at times, especially in last night's press conference, you're lying to yourselfand I wasn't even talking about the substance of his answers... it was the pausing and uhh in between like every single wordor maybe it's the Super Brainy Obama is too smart for dumb ol me to understand, I dunno
2/10/2009 10:26:35 AM
Yeah, it sounded like he was defending himself in a debate. Come on dude, you're the President. You don't need to convince anyone. Just do your durn job and be confident about it.
2/10/2009 10:46:06 AM
President O'Drama
2/10/2009 11:54:35 AM
^ lol. There were questions, it's a serious time - he answered them....and quite thoroughly. Not sure what your point is.Oh I forgot, you don't have one - you just want something to rail against eh? More tears from conservatives, someone hand me a paddle.[Edited on February 10, 2009 at 12:36 PM. Reason : -]
2/10/2009 12:36:35 PM
Yes we have to act now before Godzilla arrives. I mean without throwing a bunch of money into the volcano to statisfy the volcano gods this recession will last until late 2009... the horror.
2/10/2009 1:39:39 PM
what a small man for such a large joban empty shirt and nothing more
2/10/2009 2:14:35 PM
My point was I thought people choose "the politics of hope over fear". LOL
2/10/2009 2:23:25 PM
2/10/2009 2:32:50 PM
"these are things that my economists have said, its what John McCains economists have said, even George Bush's have said it . . . . . 1 and 2"Even Obama refers to the Bushs as "1 and 2" hilarity
2/10/2009 3:48:36 PM
While I hate hate hate most of what this economic stimulus bill is composed of, I honestly don't think it would be much different at all had it been McCain up on the pulpet last night and not Obama.
2/10/2009 3:50:20 PM
I agree with you mostly. However, I doubt there would have been as many earmarks.. mccain was pretty serious about that. And it sure wouldnt have a govt take over of healthcare buried in it.
2/10/2009 4:23:08 PM
There aren't any earmarks in the bill so what the hell are you talking about?
2/10/2009 4:35:49 PM
I actually was thinking the other day that it would have been substantially different under McCain just because he would have had to work a lot harder than Obama to get it through congress.I think it's very likely the democrats would have been trying to obstruct things as much as the republicans are now.
2/10/2009 4:40:40 PM
Do you think its interesting that there is more bi-partisan support against the bill than against it? In the House 11 Democrats voted against the bill. In the Senate 3 Republicans voted for it.
2/10/2009 4:46:25 PM
^ not if you look at it by percentages.11 democrats in the house works out to about 5% going against the rest of the dems. Vs about 9% of the republicans crossing over to vote for the stimulus.
2/10/2009 4:50:23 PM
^Good call
2/11/2009 12:51:23 AM