User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » The Dark Knight Critics Page [1]  
HUR
All American
17732 Posts
user info
edit post

Recently I have been shocked with several of my friends who critiqued the Dark Knight as a bad movie. One of them even saying he fell asleep twice during the film.

I just don't get it. Easily i'd say its the best movie i've seen in 2008 and would probably put it on my top 10 list.

I guess the movie now being all bubbly and goofy like the comic books let them down or maybe the diabolic casting of the joker instead of the slap stick comic joker like the previous one.

Personally i think these guys are idiots the film was dark complex and Heath Ledger's acting was incredible.

1/13/2009 9:09:23 AM

Slave Famous
Become Wrath
34079 Posts
user info
edit post

Things are worse than ever !

1/13/2009 9:12:54 AM

gunzz
IS NÚMERO UNO
68205 Posts
user info
edit post

clearly your ideas are so fresh and new that it warranted another thread on the topic

1/13/2009 9:13:48 AM

Senez
All American
8112 Posts
user info
edit post

I could see falling asleep during portions of the film. Some of it was unbelievably slow.

With that said, it was still one of 2008's best films.

1/13/2009 9:16:55 AM

Smath74
All American
93278 Posts
user info
edit post

i think it is a tad bit overrated, but still a good movie.

1/13/2009 9:21:23 AM

BigHitSunday
Dick Danger
51059 Posts
user info
edit post

one dead faggot does not a good movie make

1/13/2009 9:24:53 AM

Wraith
All American
27257 Posts
user info
edit post

WHAT CRITICS?

WHAT CRITICS?

WHAT CRITICS?

1/13/2009 9:28:23 AM

nothing22
All American
21537 Posts
user info
edit post

tww you know me- i'm not one to lie to you, but this movie left me a little underwhelmed. maybe i was expecting more or something, i dunno.

Quote :
"Some of it was unbelievably slow."

and it's not even a OOOO I NEED MORE SPEEDBOATS AND SPLOSIONS kind of slow. it feels like a comfortable post-lunch with grey skies nap

maggie gyllenhaal? i just didn't care. i tried, i really did.

please don't take this as hate- i'm only king douchebag on the things that don't matter.

1/13/2009 9:38:32 AM

OopsPowSrprs
All American
8383 Posts
user info
edit post

Maggie Gyllenhall looked haggard. They could have found a hotter chick.

But otherwise a great movie.

1/13/2009 9:47:23 AM

nothing22
All American
21537 Posts
user info
edit post

that, and it's not even just because she looks like an old lady- she didn't sell her character. i found it difficult to understand, for plausibility's sake, why bruce wayne and/or harvey dent even cared about her.

1/13/2009 10:03:39 AM

hydro290
All American
1703 Posts
user info
edit post

I thought it was a good movie; it just drug a little bit in parts. I liked Batman and Batman Begins better.

1/13/2009 10:09:54 AM

simonn
best gottfriend
28968 Posts
user info
edit post

it wasn't a bad movie, but it was the most overrated movie i've seen in years.

imo, it was no better than quantum of solace, which people shit on.

1/13/2009 10:28:41 AM

WillemJoel
All American
8006 Posts
user info
edit post

honestly, if it wasn't for Heath Ledger's performance, it might've been pretty meh.

seriously.

1/13/2009 10:36:18 AM

AndyMac
All American
31922 Posts
user info
edit post

I thought it was great, possibly the best comic movie ever, but honestly I didn't enjoy it any more than I did Iron Man.

1/13/2009 10:45:34 AM

jbrick83
All American
23447 Posts
user info
edit post

^^This is true.

And still...I'd probably just describe it as a pretty good movie. Not great...and not even close to my top 10...but still a pretty good movie.

Movies that I just find entertaining (like a good action flick or horror film that isn't all about substance), I usually just classify as a "good" movie. Heath Ledger's performance makes it better than just a good movie.

1/13/2009 11:08:54 AM

HUR
All American
17732 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"t's not even a OOOO I NEED MORE SPEEDBOATS AND SPLOSIONS kind of slow."


yeah i'm sure my buddies who ditched dark knight loveddd Quantum Solace b.c its full of ACTION, things that go boom, and fights. Since they are to ADD to pay attention to a plot.

The only down side i thought to the movie was i thought batman's girlfriend was pretty ugly.

1/13/2009 11:33:30 AM

marko
Tom Joad
72828 Posts
user info
edit post

they could have shaved 30-45 min off if it

1/13/2009 12:57:23 PM

simonn
best gottfriend
28968 Posts
user info
edit post

^^ the plot was wasn't any good, though.

[Edited on January 13, 2009 at 1:15 PM. Reason : super generic.]

1/13/2009 1:15:53 PM

supercalo
All American
2042 Posts
user info
edit post

I think maggie's more cute than she is pretty, but that's just me.

Like someone said before in one of these threads, "Its Heat with costumes." Except there was no backstory. I found myself daydreaming through it.

and btw Christian Bale is not Batman, I dont care how hard they try to sell it.

1/13/2009 1:26:34 PM

MunkeyMuck
All American
4427 Posts
user info
edit post

After I watched it for the first time I thought it was amazing.

Every viewing since has make it substantially worse.

1/13/2009 3:08:55 PM

AC Slater
All American
9276 Posts
user info
edit post

It is not a great movie because bale's voice is fucking awful. I laughed everytime he opened his mouth.


That alone ruined it for me because the joker was awesome

1/13/2009 3:12:26 PM

EuroTitToss
All American
4790 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Some of it was unbelievably slow."


I have four words for you: ADHD

1/13/2009 6:03:36 PM

dweedle
All American
77386 Posts
user info
edit post

NO MORE DEAD COPS

1/13/2009 6:18:03 PM

volex
All American
1758 Posts
user info
edit post

i think batman in general is at the point that after so many batman movies, no one really cares about 1.5 hours of plot anymore

[Edited on January 13, 2009 at 6:20 PM. Reason : hooray bad guys are doing bad things and batman is sad about stuff]

1/13/2009 6:19:25 PM

CharlieEFH
All American
21806 Posts
user info
edit post

TDK wasn't a Batman movie

it was a movie with Batman in it

1/13/2009 7:10:24 PM

Woodfoot
All American
60354 Posts
user info
edit post

when i watch it now, i only watch scenes featuring the joker

it only takes about 35 minutes, and its pretty rad

maybe in a year or so i'll be down to watch the whole thing again

1/13/2009 11:30:13 PM

 Message Boards » Entertainment » The Dark Knight Critics Page [1]  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.39 - our disclaimer.