Apparently, within 100 miles from a border(or ocean), authorities can question and search any individual without probable cause.(Presumably limited to the determination of citizenship, but let's not kid ourselves.) These are not just random automobile checkpoints(driving is a privilege, yada yada), this would include any person walking down the street. Interesting tidbit. Those drama queens at the ACLU call it the Constitution-free zone, and according to them, it includes 2/3 of the US population. I'll bet the Johnston County Sheriff's Department would like to know about this. Or does it only apply to Border Agents? Does JoCo have border agents?
1/4/2009 10:45:31 PM
link?
1/4/2009 11:28:20 PM
zelda? is that you?You wouldn't believe the shit I've been through. There were these crazy-ass spider things, and a sea monster that spit fireballs, and motherfuckers that came straight up from nowhere out of the sand. And then, get this...once I finished...yeah this is the real knee-slapper...I HAD TO DO IT ALL OVER AGAIN.[Edited on January 4, 2009 at 11:58 PM. Reason : .]
1/4/2009 11:54:52 PM
where did you hear that?
1/4/2009 11:58:25 PM
lols
1/4/2009 11:59:21 PM
http://www.aclu.org/privacy/spying/areyoulivinginaconstitutionfreezone.htmlAlright, there you go. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have tinfoil hats to fold.
1/5/2009 12:00:34 AM
there was a BS article in the independent last week about the 287g program that pissed me off. they omitted key facts about an example they were citing to push their agenda. it was an incident i have first hand info on and so reading their lies really pissed me off
1/5/2009 4:47:12 AM
^please post the BS article and your first hand info
1/5/2009 7:58:22 AM
^^SPILL IT!
1/5/2009 8:31:38 AM
http://www.indyweek.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A272683
1/5/2009 9:50:58 AM
simple solution for the immigrants:DONT BE ILLEGAL.KEEP YOUR PAPERWORK UPDATED.seriously. these are minimum things that you would be required to do in ANY country. it is not too much to ask.
1/5/2009 10:04:11 AM
yeah, i think it is entirely too lenient to begin with. why should you have to commit any other crime to be deported when you are here ILLEGALLY in the first place? how is that not a crime worthy of being deported over? deport them BEFORE they commit any crime, be it misdemeanor or felony.
1/5/2009 10:13:04 AM
1/5/2009 10:24:55 AM
1/5/2009 10:24:57 AM
1/5/2009 10:58:57 AM
1/5/2009 12:52:32 PM
1/5/2009 1:52:58 PM
I as well hate hard-working people trying to earn a better life for themselves.
1/5/2009 2:03:50 PM
If they had waited for a legal and bureaucratic route into this county they would have missed the housing boom and resultant opportunities. It's always seemed smart and ballsy to me. I'd like to think I'm man enough to break a few laws to make a fortune.
1/5/2009 2:07:36 PM
^^^Violent criminals are much more of a drain on society than illegals who otherwise do nothing wrong...I would rather have 10 non-violent illegals in NC than 1 person who commits armed robbery, without a doubt.The law is not meant to target illegals who are no harm to anyone, and is being used in a way that does not make everyone "safer"....it is laughable that law enforcement essentially prioritizes catching illegals over violent offenders and has the audacity to claim that is better for the community.it's merely a product of the current political climate, and officials wanting to tout "being tough on illegal immigration".
1/5/2009 2:34:26 PM
1/5/2009 3:16:23 PM
^i agree somewhat...I guess my biggest issue is with public officials that are so quick to throw the "it keeps you safer" argument out there, for every damn thing they do....as in this case for example, where any rational person would see that it has high potential create a larger problem.and I disagree almost any time rights are effectively violated/taken away from law abiding citizens to catch those who are not.
1/5/2009 3:24:27 PM
you are not law-abiding if you are here illegally. its as if a lot of you are completely looking over that fact.
1/5/2009 3:34:30 PM
no, when legal citizens who happen to be hispanic are profiled and scrutinized more than another would be, in the name of catching illegals, I disagree.I have no problem with the law being carried out as intended, but it is quickly turing into something it was not meant to be.
1/5/2009 3:43:53 PM
OIC
1/5/2009 3:47:37 PM
1/5/2009 3:57:43 PM
way to distort the argument typical SB. lets throw out the craziest hypothetical we can think of to make our point.
1/5/2009 4:08:17 PM
and how would her being illegal absolve you from the rape charges?
1/5/2009 4:27:29 PM
of course it wouldnt. he is basically trolling with a statement like that.
1/5/2009 4:28:30 PM
that graph .... ... that graph?
1/5/2009 4:30:47 PM
1/5/2009 4:33:33 PM
if you are an illegal mexican lady so worried about roaming, raping bands of college white boys then you best take your ass down and get a green card PRONTO.
1/5/2009 4:44:42 PM
damn you police, picking on the law abiding, hard working citizens who got where they are by breaking the law
1/5/2009 5:10:51 PM
1/5/2009 5:14:28 PM