what is that approximately in the 1/4 ? basic google searches says around 12.90ish ET but the trap? like 115 maybe? not sureand no it's not my car. i would be pissed if it ran that slow after all the money i put into it
8/26/2008 6:59:03 PM
[slow] thats how fast, what is it? a '73 pinto?
8/26/2008 7:02:28 PM
60ft. must be bad because that's a pretty high mph and tells me it's a quicker car than the et reveals. kinda hard to guesstimate without more info, but i would say 115-118mph might be close. i'd probably call the et closer to 12.30-12.50 though knowing it's pulling hard on the big end for whatever reason.
8/26/2008 8:23:22 PM
FWD?
8/26/2008 8:27:52 PM
yeah, that's about right. the nsx consistently ran 8.6 in the 1/8th and 13.4 in the 1/4 and those times were with a 1.8 60ft. i think i remember a trap speed of 106 in the 1/4 so that would prove true to bbr's thinking.[Edited on August 26, 2008 at 9:06 PM. Reason : -]
8/26/2008 9:06:41 PM
here is my slipno traction.lots of factors, its hard to get even close to a real estimate, well not hard, but its a waste of time.
8/26/2008 11:35:35 PM
shit's like a 94 Z28.. slow.i'd give it a buck 0 five, 110 maxbut its like everyone else said, hard to tell without more facts
8/27/2008 12:22:58 AM
8/27/2008 11:51:25 AM
nga's at porsche, not ferrari. but he does work on a lot of ferraris
8/27/2008 2:04:40 PM
the 8.3 @ 90 was from this guy with an 88 rx-7 turbo like mine who randomly bugs me to ask for car advice or talk about his car. I thought the trap was pretty high... car only made like 305 rwhp
8/27/2008 5:26:09 PM
I would guess that would net around a 12.50 at about 115 on a long track.That 1/8 mile pass is eerily similar to what mine's done on worn street tires with a 2.3-ish short time
8/28/2008 11:10:34 AM