This is just another reason why TWC has about 40 days of service left here at my place!!!Why cant we in Raleigh get the same lineups as a city 1 hour away?These are the channels that Greensboro gets and we dont...545 MTV - HD546 TLC HD547 Animal Planet HD548 Science Channel HD549 Discovery Channel HD553 National Geographic HD555 The History Channel HD565 ESPN News HD566 Disney HD567 ABC Family HD575 CNN HD581 Lifetime Movie Network HD
7/8/2008 3:59:30 PM
Yeah, I sent an email to TWC a month ago asking them if they were planning on adding any more HD channels since we are getting the shaft. Their response, "we are not planning on adding any HD channels at this time". BS
7/8/2008 7:26:55 PM
Usually we're behind Raleigh here in Greensboro. They just added 3-4 of those last week.
7/9/2008 3:34:12 PM
We get MTV HD, Discovery Channel HD, and history channel HD in Raleigh.
7/9/2008 3:46:51 PM
Oh ... MTVHD, good thing we have that worthwhile station in HD
7/9/2008 3:55:38 PM
really all I want is the discovery, tlc, and science channels...other than that, I dont watch the other shit anyways
7/9/2008 5:44:55 PM
okay i was thinking about switching to DirectTV. For people that has switch from TWC (raleigh) or have it- what do you think? Do you have any problems? What package do you have? Do they have as many hidden costs as TWC?And then what internet service do you use if you have DirectTV? Thanks[Edited on July 9, 2008 at 5:52 PM. Reason : lj]
7/9/2008 5:48:42 PM
we're getting the shaft up here in charlotte also. I wish our apartment had an HD satellite view
7/9/2008 8:16:01 PM
7/9/2008 8:18:41 PM
7/9/2008 10:35:13 PM
ah, i just checked, and i was thinking of national geographic HD, not history HD.and I did not realize that MHD != MTV HD or that discovery HD != discovery hd theatre.I could give two shits and a fuck about mtv hd though. I'd consider paying extra not to have it available.
7/9/2008 11:05:04 PM
wasn't part of the reason for TWC switching to the new GAWD-AWFUL interface to free up bandwidth for more HD channels?
7/10/2008 11:18:58 AM
WANT SCI-FI HD!!!
7/10/2008 11:28:41 AM
^directv
7/14/2008 2:12:58 PM
MHD isn't MTVHD, but it is a combination of content from MTV, VH1, and CMT.Dish has all of those except mtvhd and lifetime hd (didn't know that exists)
7/14/2008 2:24:36 PM
any word on new channels being added?
9/18/2008 3:10:40 PM
So I now understand how TWC gets away with having almost no HD channels....they only do this shit to some of their customers.Oh...We got USA HD for the olympics, but as soon as the olympics ended TWC took it away. Which doesn't make any damn sense.
9/18/2008 3:33:46 PM
wellMHD changed its name to Palladia HDprogressah ha, and bookmark this link for yourself: http://www.timewarnercable.com/Carolinas/programming/channelChangeUpdate.html
9/18/2008 3:37:45 PM
fuckin right!! I've been wanting the BigTen Network since it's inception.
9/18/2008 5:09:25 PM
Oh HD lineup makes no sense. We get shit like TBS and TNT in HD that has almost NO original content.Yet we don't get discovery(HD theatre doesnt count), USA,etc that actually provide HD content.If its a matter of bandwidth or w/e they should get rid of TBS in HD and replace it with any other HD channel.Upconverts of seinfield? seriously?
9/18/2008 5:42:47 PM
I love it. It's timewarner's shityness that makes a service like Hulu viable.
9/18/2008 5:58:51 PM
Apparently the clowns from universal are as dumb as TWC.I don't pay the $10 a month for the 3 additional HD channels, but recently they changed it so everyone gets UHD(universal HD).I think universal is messing with me. Keep in mind this is an HD only channel. There is no SD counterpart, yet they insist on showing movies that were made before 1990?I know its cheap to show old movies and show them over and over. But whats the point in making a HD only channel, then show shitty upconverts?
9/18/2008 6:05:18 PM
^you realize "HD" has nothing to do with when the movie was filmed? Movies before the 90s will look just as good as movies after the 90s. Either way they digitally scan 35mm film. I have a beautiful copy of Casablanca (1942) in 1080p (4:3 though) on bluray. They simply scanned in the 35mm film and converted it to digital.Now upconverting is a different story. Some networks upconvert dvds to 1080i to be broadcast and this isn't as good as a digital scan (method they use to convert film movies to bluray) because the original source is still a DVD. There's only a handfull of major movies that were actually filmed digitally. 35mm film is still the standard for filming movies because right now it's better quality than a 1080p digital camera can film (able to get more lines of resolution from a 35mm scan than 1080).Now as far as which one the networks use (upconverted dvd or digital scan) i don't know. If the movie is already out on bluray/hddvd then it's likely to be that, but if it isn't out on either format then it could be an upconvert from a dvd or it could be a true digital 1080p scan. I don't really know how that works.[Edited on September 18, 2008 at 6:29 PM. Reason : .]
9/18/2008 6:19:42 PM
Unfortunately any 1080p scan would have to be converted to a 1080i or 720p signal anyways since, as far as the TWC website says, they don't offer signals at 1080p. Depending on the lazyness of the the network, that could undue the most loving scan of a well preserved film.
9/18/2008 6:45:47 PM
I know this. I don't really care about the reasoning though.Purely based on what I've seen...the quality of movies made after 2000 are much better than movies made before 1990.I'm speaking of what is shown on television. Obviously if a movie from 1956 is released on bluray special edition its going to be good quality.Networks don't seem to give a shit about taking the time to get the best quality version of Ferris Bueller's Day Off though.[Edited on September 19, 2008 at 3:18 PM. Reason : .]
9/19/2008 3:14:47 PM
^That's just simply not true though. You're basing your judgement off of what versions of those movies you've seen. You might have simply seen upconverted movies before the 90's (from dvd) and actual blurays from after 2000. You can't compare them like that. There's plenty of poor quality movies after 2000, and plenty of great looking movies before the 90's. Plus quality is a very relative term.-Ok let me rephrase, so you're saying:"The quality of upconverted dvds from before the 90's is worse than the quality of blurays from after 2000"Well that's obvious. On the other hand if you compare the same lines of resolution from two different films, then the one made after 2000 isn't always going to be better quality than ones before the 90's. [Edited on September 19, 2008 at 3:24 PM. Reason : .]
9/19/2008 3:17:09 PM
I caught a crazy crisp HD feed of Deliverance the other night. Much better than whichever DVD I saw.
9/19/2008 5:27:18 PM
9/19/2008 7:09:59 PM
the rich get richer http://www.news-record.com/content/2008/09/10/article/time_warner_cable_to_launch_new_hd_channels_fridayRaleigh ----------------------------------------------------Greensboro Stuff greensboro gets in HD that raleigh does not:TLCAnimal PlanetScienceDiscoveryHistory ChannelPlanet GreenESPN NewsDisney ABC FamilyESPNUCNNLifetime Movie Network[Edited on September 23, 2008 at 12:10 AM. Reason : a]
9/22/2008 11:50:20 PM
Lifetime Movie NetworkDisney ABC Familyok those two dont count
9/23/2008 12:19:15 AM
TWC Raleigh seems averse to giving us ESPNU to people until a year after everyone else on the east coast. I mean didn't Greensboro customers get standard def ESPNU about 20 months before Raleigh customers?
9/23/2008 2:37:57 AM
http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/09/23/big-ten-network-coming-to-twc-in-the-carolinas-raleigh-durham/Raleigh getting Big Ten Network HD
9/23/2008 7:18:55 PM