I don't mind helping people by programs like welfare.. most jobs like the one I'm starting soon..made me do a piss test to make sure that I was not doing drugs. So by passing this drug test I get to pay taxes on my earning, and some of the tax I will pay will go to welfare. What I find is funny is that even though I have to do a piss test to pay for people on welfare..people on welfare DO NOT have to pass a piss test to get MY MONEY. I believe by implementing a piss test for people wanting welfare you will cut a significant portion of people on welfare that are not putting the money to good use. It is only fair that if I have to pass a piss test to pay for programs like welfare then the people using it should pass a piss test to receive my money.
3/25/2008 8:32:00 PM
and fuck their kids too.
3/25/2008 8:34:56 PM
I think there's already a thread about this...But how effective do you honestly think this will be? I know plenty of people that have passed drug tests, while still continuing to do drugs.And secondly, should the gov. make all the investors and executive of Bear Sterns take a drug test before giving them the bail out money?Should all students that go to a public school or university be required to get drug tested?Should all gov. funded scholarships mandate drug testing?The cost to implement this would not out weight the savings associated. There are much more efficient ways to fix gov. spending than some subtly classist/racist mis-guided attempt at attacking welfare.
3/25/2008 8:38:40 PM
3/25/2008 9:31:25 PM
I'm Bev Perdue.As your governor, I'll work hard to prevent any poor single mother, or teacher from having to do anything as degrading as peeing in a cup to get their money. This ad paid for by the Teacher's Union.
3/25/2008 9:33:23 PM
^^^ the reason this will never be seriously considered is that it will automatically be called classist/racist and no one will accept that political liability. I'm a teacher, and I get tested because I have a bus driver's license but I don't think other teachers do.
3/25/2008 9:48:13 PM
if they have enough money to buy drugs, they have enough money that they don't need any from me.
3/25/2008 9:48:24 PM
^Well, sarijoul pretty much summed up the topic.They may not need your money, but their kids do.
3/25/2008 11:08:26 PM
^ what, their kids need drugs too? ^^^ That's because most (but not all) people who support these types of programs ARE racist/classist. Why not audit the taxes of families applying for financial aid (and drug test them while we`re at it)?Poor people using gov. money to buy drugs is a bad thing, but why pick on the crime of drugs and the gov. service of welfare? I see no rational reason to do so. It's one thing to disagree with welfare principles, but it's another to act like it's the only are where people rip off the gov.. I don't know how you would account for this, but I bet the gov. loses far more revenue from people cheating on taxes, than from poor people using welfare to buy drugs.
3/25/2008 11:18:06 PM
3/25/2008 11:32:04 PM
3/26/2008 8:48:55 AM
i might support piss tests for welfare recipients if the consequence of failing wasn't being removed from welfare, but being put into some sort of program to get off the drugs. because yeah, you can take them off the welfare, but that doesn't mean they're just going to quit the drugs they're addicted to. they're just going to be a different drain on society. they'll likely commit crime to get their cash (or commit more crime if they had already gone down that road).
3/26/2008 9:20:12 AM
Guys, don't let wolfpack72 dictate The Soap Box. He's a retard, and the threads he has been making reflect that. Welfare isn't even an issue, it's being phased out like it should be. wolfpack72 - SHUT THE FUCK UP.
3/26/2008 9:22:17 AM
^^i might support welfare if i knew the money being taken from my paycheck wasnt going to support someone's drug habitwhy cant the consequence be that person losing their welfare privileges? or if we give them 2nd chance after 2nd chance, is that going to somehow teach them to be responsible parents? fuck no]
3/26/2008 9:23:24 AM
3/26/2008 9:24:21 AM
so is blaming me for you being a shitty parentalso i might support piss tests for my job if the consequence of failing wasn't being fired from my job, but being put into some sort of program to get off the drugs.]
3/26/2008 9:25:08 AM
3/26/2008 12:17:47 PM
3/26/2008 3:07:01 PM
3/26/2008 3:09:33 PM
what do they call that, pastorial trolling? evangelical trolling? i dont know the exact term
3/26/2008 3:12:54 PM
I just think anyone on welfare should be enrolled in gov't sponsored community service projects. This would make poor people work in order to earn their welfare and provide a service to the community. As extra incentive if they are doing manual labor picking up trash from the freeway mid-july or doing some other kind of shitty job perhaps it would give them incentive to get a job of their own and get off welfare. After all when FDR became president he simply didn't start rolling out the welfare checks he created employment programs like the WPA in which young men/women worked on gov't project i.e. norris dam from the TVA.
3/26/2008 9:23:12 PM
unemployment is low enough that we don't need employment programs. people on welfare don't need to do menial tasks--they need to get jobs.(the ones with jobs--this doesn't apply to you)
3/26/2008 9:33:28 PM
^^^ I call it sarcasm Or just funny.I am here to perform my usual function: Prove it? Is there data that shows more welfare recipients use drugs, or, just data that shows what they spend their money on? I mean, I've never known anyone on welfare, so I can't speak to how they live their lives. I'll look, too, but I'm tossing this out there in case someone already knows.
3/27/2008 8:09:13 AM