Which candidate can you most see giving the speech this time next year?I say Obama. Romney could deliver a decent one I think but I don't think I would like anything he has to say. McCain, Giuliani, Huckabee, Clinton, Edwards, and Paul all make me sort of cringe.
1/28/2008 10:17:05 PM
Ron Paul.But, you do realize, IIRC, that they don't make a state of the union address their first year, right?
1/28/2008 10:19:06 PM
Whatever, I was 13 when Bush would have given his first one. The concept still stands.
1/28/2008 10:20:41 PM
1/28/2008 10:24:08 PM
this thread is like Rudy's campaign: failure to launch
1/28/2008 10:24:51 PM
It's been up for 7 minutes you twat.
1/28/2008 10:26:01 PM
1/28/2008 11:43:03 PM
1/29/2008 1:08:54 AM
i was elected to leadnot to read
1/29/2008 7:51:25 AM
concerning the topic at hand, I thought Bush delivered a good speech at the State of the Union. I thought he got to his points quickly and I thought it was probably his best one to date as far as laying out his plans and thoughts in a clear manner.
1/29/2008 9:30:59 AM
^Are you joking? His "plans and thoughts" came off like a petty rehashing of the last 7 years. It was probably pretty clear because he played small ball.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hF9KvamY7Pk
1/29/2008 10:49:39 AM
I think 'small ball' is what he shouldve been doing the whole time. He is a simple person. He was elected largely because the American people thought they could identify with him. He should deliver simple speeches with simple objectives. This is one of the only times he has ever done that.
1/29/2008 1:10:21 PM
my buddy who doesnt have cable texted me last night on some "i've never really watched a state of the union address before and i didnt realize there were rounds of applause after almost everything"whats funny is since he doesnt have cable i doubt he could find ANYTHING else on last night haha
1/29/2008 1:12:56 PM
I'd vote for an president who started the state of the union with "Please keep all applause to the end, my show comes on at 9."
1/29/2008 1:22:49 PM
It's going to be hillary
1/29/2008 11:45:42 PM
^^didn't it start at 9?[Edited on January 30, 2008 at 1:47 PM. Reason : ^]
1/30/2008 1:47:22 PM