vote no!http://forums.charlotte.com/n/mb/message.asp?webtag=kr-cltissues&msg=3140.1&ctx=1
12/7/2007 6:36:11 AM
12/7/2007 6:45:37 AM
yes - 3no - 101, or lol
12/7/2007 6:52:38 AM
Yes 3 votes (3%)No 108 votes (97%)what was wrong with it?
12/7/2007 6:53:59 AM
Poll | Are you satisfied with the process of naming a new Mecklenburg sheriff? Yes 12 votes (4%)No 261 votes (96%)
12/7/2007 7:45:44 AM
^damn, people are voting like hell
12/7/2007 7:47:38 AM
96% no[Edited on December 7, 2007 at 8:11 AM. Reason : j]
12/7/2007 8:10:56 AM
what's this about anywayYes 16 votes (4%)No 373 votes (96%)[Edited on December 7, 2007 at 8:12 AM. Reason : poll]
12/7/2007 8:11:54 AM
Yes20No465I hope this isnt all just TWW. haha, wow. Another tww poll skewed. Too bad we can't get a poll update to our own website, eh.
12/7/2007 8:36:03 AM
Yes 22 votes (4%) No 487 votes (96%) 509 people have voted so far
12/7/2007 8:39:09 AM
Poll | Are you satisfied with the process of naming a new Mecklenburg sheriff? Yes 84 votes (7%) No 1144 votes (93%) 1228 people have voted so far
12/7/2007 11:33:37 AM
why would one be unsatisfied with the process? what happened?
12/7/2007 11:34:29 AM
i voted!
12/7/2007 11:43:26 AM
ha831179
12/7/2007 11:43:59 AM
I don't mind skewing stupid stuff, but I'm not voting on this cause I don't live there.
12/7/2007 11:46:33 AM
yes 88no 1214
12/7/2007 11:55:10 AM
Considering that this thread has <150 views, I'm thinking all the "no" votes aren't from TWW, at least no 90% of them.
12/7/2007 11:58:40 AM
I don't know what this was about, but I did wat TWW told me to
12/7/2007 12:11:36 PM