Quote :

"Rosie O'Donnell, who abruptly left 'The View' on ABC last spring after drawing attention and ratings for her opinions on everything from the Iraq war to her co-hosts, is in serious discussions to return to television atop a new soapbox: a prime-time show on the cable news channel MSNBC, according to executives on both sides of the negotiations who have been briefed directly. Under one scenario, Ms. O'Donnell would be given the 9 p.m. slot each weeknight on MSNBC, where she would go head-to-head with two heavyweights of cable talk: 'Larry King Live' on CNN and 'Hannity & Colmes' on Fox News. Her show would replace 'Live with Dan Abrams,' a relatively low-rated program that only recently replaced 'Scarborough Country,' which was also little-watched."

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/05/business/media/05cnd-msnbc.html?ex=1352005200&en=85649773677f555e&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

Two things: (1) The fact that a news organization would even consider hiring a left-wing moonbat such as Baghdad Rosie proves to me that they are biased, to say the least. And (2) many of you were wrong when you claimed that she's not taken seriously by many across America and in the media

If MSNBC actually goes through with this, I'll be shocked. And it'll likely be the final nail in this network's coffin.

11/8/2007 5:42:38 AM

Don't forget that they recently took on Tucker Carlson too.

Maybe they're balancing the network out with a load of idiots from both sides.

Maybe they'll send you an invite next.

11/8/2007 7:27:19 AM

it's already over and done with

she blabbed and they dropped the idea

11/8/2007 7:44:15 AM

oh look, another Rosie O'Donnell rant from hooksaw!

man, you've got issues with her, dont you? i saw the subject title and KNEW you were involved before i ever saw your name attached

11/8/2007 8:13:20 AM

que the sausage fingers pic!

11/8/2007 9:19:47 AM

If you find Rosie O'Donnell threatening, then you have some SERIOUS issues of your own.

It's fucking Rosie O'Donnell. She's a fat, stupid, irrelevant clown, and nobody gives a shit about what she thinks.

11/8/2007 9:25:13 AM

They're saying she blew the deal because she blabbed about it too early. This, from her blog:

Quote :

"msnbc one hour live following keith olbermann we were close to a deal almost done i let it slip in miami causing panic on the studio end well what can u do 2day there is no deal poof my career as a pundit is over b4 it began just as well i figure everything happens for a reason bashert - as we say and on we go "

11/8/2007 9:33:37 AM

que obviously bias article from some wingnut site with emboldened text and rolly eyes stating how someone, somewhere cares therefore we all care.

11/8/2007 9:34:17 AM

she writes like a 12 year old high school girl with ADD

11/8/2007 9:34:37 AM

Maybe it's a hidden code to all of her commie comrades that now is they time for their attack.

11/8/2007 9:36:03 AM

11/8/2007 9:43:03 AM

que not knowing how to spell "cue"

11/8/2007 9:51:41 AM

Good call, sir. I know that Webster will be all over that one.

11/8/2007 9:55:44 AM

Quote :

"The fact that a news organization would even consider hiring a left-wing moonbat such as Baghdad Rosie proves to me that they are biased, to say the least."

Without even a hint of irony.

What does Bill O'Reilly say about Fox, then?

11/8/2007 10:04:23 AM

Because that's what we were discussing.

Way to be on the ball!

11/8/2007 10:44:35 AM

It actually was what we were discussing.

He was accusing MSNBC of having bias for having a prime time liberal pundit.

I was pointing out that for this to be true, the opposite would also be true. Of course he won't concede this, and his whole premise will be flawed.


It must really rile you up when I call you out for bringing up stuff that really is irrelevant, huh?

11/8/2007 10:53:53 AM

this thread is about Rosie and MSNBC, its not about O'Reilly and Fox News...gosh every thread turns into you bitching about Fox News doesnt it...get a life

how is it "actually what you were discussing" when you were the first one to bring up Fox News or O'Reilly? I thought other people were discussing it?

11/8/2007 10:54:28 AM

Quote :

"(1) The fact that a news organization would even consider hiring a left-wing moonbat such as Baghdad Rosie proves to me that they are biased, to say the least."

When a conservative accuses a network of having a liberal bias for hiring a liberal primetime pundit, why on earth would anyone even mention FOX? how completely off topic! You couldn't get more off topic if you tried!


[Edited on November 8, 2007 at 11:24 AM. Reason : .]

11/8/2007 10:56:50 AM

MSNBC has tucker carlson and he appears to be a conservative toolbag pundit.

11/8/2007 11:06:18 AM

So the person who created the thread is off topic in the first post. How about that.

11/8/2007 11:19:08 AM

According to Tree.

11/8/2007 11:22:32 AM

^yet when you say global warming is a greater danger than terrorism, its irrelevant when i point out that it hasnt ever killed anyone...how convenient for your argument!

[Edited on November 8, 2007 at 11:23 AM. Reason : ^]

11/8/2007 11:23:00 AM

Quote :

"yet when you say global warming is a greater danger than terrorism"

Where did I say that?

If only I had said that, then that crap would've been relevant. Unfortunately, you're going to go through the last couple pages of that thread and realize that it was never said.

Then you're going to have even more sand in your vagina.

[Edited on November 8, 2007 at 11:26 AM. Reason : .]

11/8/2007 11:24:37 AM

but really msnbc sucks anyway, so who really cares?

11/8/2007 11:25:32 AM

^^uhhhhhh, all throughout TSB over the last year maybe??

^its more the fact that they'd even consider hiring her in the first place

[Edited on November 8, 2007 at 11:26 AM. Reason : .]

11/8/2007 11:26:13 AM

Go to the page(s) in which I called you out for bringing up irrelevant crap.

Find a quote where anyone was talking about climate change being a greater threat than terrorism.


[Edited on November 8, 2007 at 11:33 AM. Reason : .]

11/8/2007 11:29:01 AM

To those that believe a particular storm, flood, landslide or drought is tied to global warming then resulting deaths certainly are attributable. And to some the severity of a problem isn't just measured by the loss of human lives.

11/8/2007 11:31:30 AM

^^i like how you're trying to insinuate that all along you've thought terrorism was a bigger threat...as if nobody remembers you and your lame "you have a higher probability chance of getting struck by lightning than dying in a terrorist attack" or "actually plenty of people have died from global warming...katrina, the tsunami, heat waves"...now you're pulling a complete 180 and trying to imply you've thought terrorism was a bigger threat all along? you're not fooling anyone

11/8/2007 11:32:50 AM

Actually, here it is:

/message_topic.aspx?topic=438755&page=35


-talked a lot about the feasibility of anti-climate change measures.
-talked about the politics behind climate change and how it was supposedly similar to the politics of 9/11
-then you chimed in with "I remember when climate change killed 3,000+ American citizens..." as if any of us had been comparing the threat.


It's really ok, though. Everyone here already knows that you post irrelevant crap.


^ haha, care to cite any of that?

[Edited on November 8, 2007 at 11:36 AM. Reason : .]

11/8/2007 11:34:56 AM

oh so if you didnt say it on those few pages of that one thread its irrelevant, even though you said it in multiple other threads over the past year...gotcha

i'm sure all of TSB believes you've always thought terrorism was a bigger threat than global warming.....

11/8/2007 11:38:37 AM

care to cite any of that?

11/8/2007 11:39:24 AM

no i dont care to scour over 1700 of your posts to point out something as obvious as your stance on which one was more dangerous and important to address between terrorism and global warming...im more curious as to why you pulled the complete 180 and actually acknowledged that terrorism is a bigger threat

11/8/2007 11:41:00 AM

Quote :

"and important to address"

now you're obfuscating things.

and you don't need to scour >1700 posts. Just the page cited above and maybe the two before that. I think that those pages are the relevant ones.

plus, what do my previous views (regardless of what they are) have to do with relevance within a certain discussion? I could bring up your views on hip-hop in this thread, it doesn't mean it'd be at all on topic.

11/8/2007 11:45:37 AM

Quote :

"what do my previous views (regardless of what they are) have to do with relevance within a certain discussion?"

i dunno, why do you always quote or bring up things i said months ago?? i guess its ok when you do it, but when someone does it to you, ITS NOT FAIR!!1

11/8/2007 11:48:12 AM

Quote :

"i dunno, why do you always quote or bring up things i said months ago?? i guess its ok when you do it, but when someone does it to you, ITS NOT FAIR!!1"

To be fair, you haven't quoted him at all yet. You've only made unsubstantiated paraphrases.

11/8/2007 11:51:40 AM

hahah, when did I do that?

11/8/2007 11:52:08 AM

^^reading comprehension

Quote :

"quote or bring up things"

^try anytime you're trolling me maybe? wow when did you start denying all the obvious shit than any TSB poster could definitively say about you? next thing you're gonna tell us you're a republican who likes bush just for the sake of arguing

11/8/2007 11:52:55 AM

Quote :

"actually plenty of people have died from global warming...katrina, the tsunami, heat waves"

is obvious shit than any TSB poster could definitively say about me?

I've never said it.

Yet you even used quotation marks while attributing it to me.

11/8/2007 11:55:45 AM

i cant believe im trying to prove that an anti-war liberal environmentalist like yourself has always taken global warming more seriously than terrorism in his TSB posts...and i cant believe you're denying it

11/8/2007 11:59:30 AM

Quote :

"has always taken global warming more seriously than terrorism"

now you're further obfuscating things.

11/8/2007 12:02:25 PM

you continue to back peddle

11/8/2007 12:02:53 PM

from what, exactly?

11/8/2007 12:07:38 PM

arguing with you is like arguing with salisburyboy

course salisburyboy is never gonna pull a 180 and say he's thought it was al queda all along that carried out 9/11 and he's never said it was msm/jews/etc

[Edited on November 8, 2007 at 12:10 PM. Reason : .]

11/8/2007 12:09:14 PM

If only you could cite where I said terrorism was a greater threat than climate change.

But apparently you can't.

11/8/2007 12:12:44 PM

but it would obviously be irrelevant if i could, since it wouldnt be from one of the the 2 or 3 pages that youve deemed as "fair game" to quote

i mean, "what do my previous views (regardless of what they are) have to do with relevance within a certain discussion?""

11/8/2007 12:15:42 PM

It would be irrelevant to that particular instance of you posting stupid crap.


But now you're accusing me of doing a 180.

Any citations will be relevant to that claim.

11/8/2007 12:18:32 PM

Quote :

"yet when you say global warming is a greater danger than terrorism, its irrelevant when i point out that it hasnt ever killed anyone...how convenient for your argument!"

-- TreeTwista10

Quote :

"Because that's what we were discussing. Way to be on the ball!"

-- TreeTwista10





*cough*

11/8/2007 12:21:54 PM

^you know thats originally his quote dont you? no, you dont know that, you're just being a dick

Boone shouldn't you be busy laughing at people who drive SUVs or something?

[Edited on November 8, 2007 at 12:23 PM. Reason : .]

11/8/2007 12:22:28 PM

Perhaps I am, but I'm also pointing out that you called someone out for not being on topic and less than half a page later, veered so horribly off topic.


You know, just sayin.

11/8/2007 12:24:02 PM

Quote :

"you called someone out for not being on topic and less than half a page later, veered so horribly off topic."

no i didnt, it was him who called me out for not being on topic with that quote in a different thread when i was quite on topic, and i used it when he did the exact same thing in this thread

but i'm sure you feel like you did something clever so i won't ruin it for you

11/8/2007 12:26:09 PM