9/22/2007 8:38:14 PM
9/22/2007 8:53:25 PM
Its definitely a ballsy move, I wonder if the Technician would ever do something like this
9/22/2007 8:54:42 PM
.... point?should we be outraged at the "FUCK BUSH"?or are we supposed to be outraged that they had to explain themselves?or is it that Bush is being blamed, at least indirectly, for a loudmouth in FL being tasered?
9/22/2007 8:54:53 PM
bush had to do with the tasering how?
9/22/2007 9:11:39 PM
This didn't have anything to do with Bush being involved in the tasering. It has to do with not having authorities punish political speech.
9/22/2007 9:18:02 PM
^ The kid wasn't tasered because of his political speech. This isn't a free speech issue by any means.
9/22/2007 9:36:50 PM
Of course its about free speech. Don't just make shit up, thats irritating.
9/22/2007 9:53:27 PM
The kid was removed because he was a nuisance. He was tasered for not cooperating with the police.The cops didn't grab him because they disagreed with what he was saying. It's not an issue of free speech.
9/22/2007 10:05:31 PM
Enter xvang's bad analogy #1,Comparing this issue with free speech is like saying that Micheal Vick was charged of a crime because he was black.It had nothing to do with his color. He was fighting dogs and killing them. He wouldn't have ever been arrested if he was good to the animals.It had nothing to do with his speech. He was being a nuisance and became physical with the cops. He wouldn't have ever been tazed if he cooperated with the cops.[/sarcasm + pinch of truth][Edited on September 22, 2007 at 10:29 PM. Reason : i'm bored tonight]
9/22/2007 10:28:49 PM
thats hilarious
9/22/2007 10:33:53 PM
when the best you can come up with is "FUCK BUSH!," then I think your college needs a better editorial staff. And the grammar and shit in that explanation was atrocious.
9/22/2007 10:47:21 PM
9/22/2007 11:03:54 PM
The kid, while a giant douchebag, shouldn't have been tasered.
9/22/2007 11:08:37 PM
Explain why it is.I could just as easily argue that freedom of speech means that I can crap on the sidewalk.
9/22/2007 11:16:12 PM
but that would only apply to you since you are so full of shit that so much of it must come out of your mouth when you speak
9/22/2007 11:17:27 PM
Pretty weak editorial, but hoo-ray for Free Speech!I remember back when Pope John Paul 1st died just 33 days after becoming the Holy Father.Our campus paper had a big front page headline: GOD VETOES POPE!
9/22/2007 11:21:05 PM
Crapping on a sidewalk has public health considerations. But I could support an argument where you said you wanted to crap on the sidewalk. I remind you that the freedom of speech is meant to protect speech that is not well liked. Should this guy have removed for being an nuisance? Probably? But tasered? No. The use of weapons of any kind should be reserved for people who constitute a physical threat. Not because police want to punish someone for inconveniencing them.
9/22/2007 11:23:51 PM
^ I actually agree with most of that.I just think that its an issue of excessive force and not a first amendment violation.
9/22/2007 11:33:32 PM
^ It's a bit of both.The reason the guy is perceived as a nuisance rather than a freedom fighter is that it's widely accepted by society that the whole Skull and Bones conspiracy theorists (that they're some secret shadow gov. organization or something like that) are nutjobs.But, let's pretend that he was right, and it was widely suspected that Bush and Kerry were both part of some plot to take over America for some nefarious purpose. His being removed from the mic would be perceived as trying to silence him for his beliefs.The only reason it's not seen that way really in this situation is that we all presume he's nutty. Salisburyboy is probably somewhere flipping out about this on free speech ground.
9/23/2007 12:22:01 AM
If you want to make a statement on Free Speech then at least say something with some substance.
9/23/2007 12:25:59 AM
I think it's really strange that George Bush had practically nothing to do with this, and it was a Kerry speech, and they chose to use "FUCK BUSH."Regardless of their point, that doesn't reflect positively on the editorial staff.
9/23/2007 1:09:42 AM
That headline is simply impossible. The left-wing moonbats here in TSB have assured me that there is no liberal bias in the media.
9/23/2007 4:26:55 AM
i would hardly call a collegiate editorial page "the media"
9/23/2007 9:36:12 AM
haha, can you imagine someone describing the technician as being part of the media
9/23/2007 9:53:07 AM
I like seeing people get tasered.
9/23/2007 10:10:45 AM
Hmm, how is "Fuck Bush" even controversial? I've read it before in an opinion section, just not sure where. Now, if they really want to push the boundaries of free speech, publish this cartoon:
9/23/2007 10:48:57 AM
well this was a big waste of time
9/23/2007 1:22:50 PM
9/23/2007 5:12:52 PM
^What he said. I just read that after posting. How did they get from a guy yelling at John Kerry and getting tasered when he started getting physical with security to Fuck Bush?That is some terrible logic.And the fact is, Kerry is still a Senator. The police reacted the way that they did because of the students seemingly irrational and unpredictable behavior. I wouldn't doubt it if the cops got the order from secret service to pull the guy out. Unfortunately, people are fucking crazy these days and just because he is some white kid from an apparently middle class background doesn't mean that he isn't going to try some stupid shit with a US Senator in the room.Fucking taser his ass again. [Edited on September 23, 2007 at 7:26 PM. Reason : :sad:]
9/23/2007 7:25:35 PM
DON'T TASE ME, BRO!
9/23/2007 7:32:33 PM
9/23/2007 7:59:42 PM
John Dean? Who the fuck is John Dean?
9/23/2007 8:38:15 PM
U R SMRTyou know goddamn well who he meant
9/23/2007 9:10:46 PM
aww shit. I'd been listening to some podcasts about Watergate earlier.John Dean was Nixon's White House Counsel, of course I meant Howard Dean.dur.
9/23/2007 9:19:58 PM
9/24/2007 8:50:01 AM
way to be late to the party, see above ^^
9/24/2007 10:36:58 AM
9/24/2007 10:43:10 AM
even if the kid was being a nuisance it doesnt mean he shouldnt had been heardhe had every right to be up there and ask questions.if there were rules outlined before the "town meeting" or what ever then he should have been removed. The admin who was in control of the Q&A should have cut his mic and had him removed.the cops could have pulled out of the room and outside and arrested him.the police used excessive force on someone who was NOT a threat to anyone in that room
9/24/2007 10:44:28 AM
9/24/2007 3:32:16 PM
^.Also, I read John Dean and assumed that he was either talking about Howard Dean or Jan and Dean of "Little Old Lady From Pasadena" fame.
9/24/2007 3:38:26 PM
^^^ gunnz, it's like you didn't even watch any of the videos... did you? ^ i was thinkin:[Edited on September 24, 2007 at 5:44 PM. Reason : ]
9/24/2007 5:41:53 PM
9/24/2007 6:39:25 PM
ah, the maturity of college debate these days
9/24/2007 9:48:20 PM
9/25/2007 12:56:54 AM
they call themselves "student media"not "The Media"
9/25/2007 1:29:21 AM
yeah some of them are a whole year away from having jobs in "the media"
9/25/2007 1:30:30 AM
^^ Semantics. Technician is a part of the media whether you or some others here think it is or not. For example, Technician's content is sometimes used on U-Wire and they even have official press passes--among other reasons.[Edited on September 25, 2007 at 1:36 AM. Reason : .]
9/25/2007 1:36:02 AM
U-Wire? U-WIRE????Hells bells, man, I've had several items picked up by U-Wire.Guess what the singlemost important thing to know about U-Wire is? "No One Gives a Fuck"well, except for College Media
9/25/2007 2:34:54 AM
UPDATE:
9/25/2007 12:39:42 PM