having to do some for an assignment, asside frome the nice DB access I feel like I could be doing the same things in perl easier and quicker without such a complex organizational structure
9/13/2007 4:11:28 PM
It's more about the ability to create libraries really quickly to do complicated things, then reuse them.
9/13/2007 4:15:53 PM
you mean like, object oriented programming?
9/13/2007 5:51:33 PM
hehe, i think he specifically means the "really quickly to do complicated things" part as what RoR is good at[Edited on September 13, 2007 at 5:56 PM. Reason : but what do i know. i never jumped on the RoR boat anyways]
9/13/2007 5:56:32 PM
i heard you can type in plain english and RoR will make you a fully compliant Web2.0 application. Is that true?something like:
new SocialNetworkingSite = Facebook2Facebook2.add(photogallery);Facebook2.add(chat);Facebook2.add(AJAXPopups);With Facebook2 { RoundedCorners=true; ShinyButtons=true; IconReflection=true;}
9/13/2007 6:13:01 PM
9/13/2007 6:15:11 PM
I've always seen it as a fad. Besides, PHP's done the job for me without much fuss, no point cluttering my brain.
9/13/2007 6:22:55 PM
^^Yep never said I used it, I'm a PHP guy, I find the whole RoR thing unnecessary ... my comment was more tongue in cheek than anything. Ah and it does remind me -every- bit of ColdFusion, but without the $texas requirement.^Exactly.
9/14/2007 9:52:01 AM
http://www.oreillynet.com/ruby/blog/2007/09/7_reasons_i_switched_back_to_p_1.html
9/23/2007 4:03:51 PM
RoR is one of those few times where you spend more time thinking than you do writing code.
9/24/2007 3:40:09 PM
I'm not a fan of RonR either. If your looking for a php flavor of MVC, check out cakephp - its awesome IMO.
9/26/2007 11:52:31 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQXqWkWqnSw[Edited on September 26, 2007 at 3:15 PM. Reason : .]
9/26/2007 3:15:09 PM