oops its Reventon (not revention)... but damn it's uglyhttp://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/autos/0709/gallery.2007_frankfurt_motor_show//index.html?cnn=yes$1.4M 20 made... [Edited on September 12, 2007 at 8:11 PM. Reason : deffinitely a snob car]
9/12/2007 8:09:11 PM
Did you see the all suede interior?Looks like a pimped out futuristic military vehicle
9/12/2007 8:22:43 PM
BATMOGODDAMBILE
9/12/2007 8:29:58 PM
Ugly?lol ok.Thats Darth Vader's new ride nig. I'd pimp the fucking hell out of it if I had the money.
9/12/2007 10:39:23 PM
that's far from ugly.i'd drive the shit out of that.no question. if i only had 1.4 mil.it's my new fav car.
9/12/2007 11:42:47 PM
I like it.
9/13/2007 12:58:26 AM
UGLY???? What? Do you like fat chicks or something? This car screams sexy.
9/13/2007 12:58:32 AM
not huge on the interior and the front end doesnt quite do it for me... but the rest of the car beautiful.i also mentioned batmobile to one of my roommates earlier tonight
9/13/2007 1:18:16 AM
9/13/2007 4:11:49 PM
I could buy 7000 Super Saabs for that kind of coin.
9/13/2007 4:28:10 PM
looks hot to me.
9/13/2007 4:42:15 PM
Id rather have the Pagani Zonda R for the same money. http://www.seriouswheels.com/cars/top-2007-Pagani-Zonda-R.htm
9/13/2007 5:26:51 PM
its not ugly, but its not my cup of tea
9/13/2007 5:30:56 PM
nigga plz i roll civics miatas and explorersalso s10s and vans
9/13/2007 5:35:33 PM
9/13/2007 5:36:20 PM
It reminds me of that Vector W2 from the 80's. It's not ugly by any means, but 20 years from now it will look hellaciously dated with those choppy lines. Such is life I guess.
9/14/2007 12:41:12 PM
Yes, because the stealth fighter looks dated and ancient now.Yes, because the Diablo looks like it belongs in a 80's apocalyptic sci fi flick.Yes, because F40 and F50 both scream "ancient."You guys are terrible when it comes to design.
9/14/2007 1:16:53 PM
i wonder how aerodynamic it is?compared to a non specialized model?
9/14/2007 1:23:46 PM
I just don't think the hood of a car should have more angles than a geodesic dome. You don't know what you're talking about if you can't even understand why this design won't stand the test of time. This car does not have any sleek and sexy lines. Nor does it have a burly look and a muscular stance.Like I said, it's not ugly. Twenty years from now you won't hear anyone talking about how beautiful of a car it is either.
9/14/2007 1:32:06 PM
baller
9/14/2007 3:20:10 PM
countach 2.0? ugly as shit. looks like a fuckin stealth lambo
9/14/2007 7:31:45 PM
Lambo has sold 20 of these in just 4 days!
9/14/2007 7:52:40 PM
While I like it, I prefer the regular Murcielago, which I think, is the best looking supercar even to be made, and that ever will be made.BTW, while Reventón is the name of that bull, it also means blown tire in Spanish http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/did-lamborghini-blow-it-with-the-reventon/
9/14/2007 8:06:06 PM
9/14/2007 11:36:06 PM
some actual good pics:More:http://www.worldcarfans.com/3071123.001/lamborghini-reventonhttp://www.leftlanenews.com/lamborghini-reventon.htmlBTW, why the hell is it gonna be $1.6 million????Does that body really cost the extra $1.3 million over a regular Murcielago?Or is Lambo just SEVERLY GOUGING the buyers of the 20 models to be built?
11/23/2007 10:28:16 AM
i'd have intimate relations with it.
11/23/2007 10:35:13 AM
11/23/2007 1:43:44 PM
Does it really only have 4 throttle bodies, or am I missing something? And for a million and a half bucks, I think I'd want more than 650 hp.
11/23/2007 5:13:55 PM
^no you wouldn't, jewi'd have intimate relations with it.
11/23/2007 10:49:40 PM
Yeah, I'm a jew...
11/24/2007 12:27:45 PM
I've never really been into lambo's. the styling is too outrageous for me.
11/24/2007 3:55:40 PM
It's a stunning car, but for the same money you could get a Bugatti Veyron and a Ferrari F430 and still have enough money left over to buy yourself a nice sensible Mercedes or BMW as a daily driver.
11/24/2007 6:08:59 PM
^ excellent point.btw, here is the background story of the pics above:http://www.worldcarfans.com/9071123.007/lamborghini-reventon-takes-on-a-tornadoLamborghini Reventon Takes on a Tornado
11/25/2007 4:08:14 PM
^^ true, but the 20 people who'll buy these already have a Veyron and most of the cars Ferrari has ever produced.
11/25/2007 4:25:32 PM
11/25/2007 6:31:40 PM
660 hp in Europe, 650 hp in the model sold in the US.
11/25/2007 6:35:35 PM
Bugatti Veyron and Shelby Ultimate Aero are closer to what I expect from a modern $1 million + supercar. I think Lambo was just going for style and exclusivity with this car, seeing as how they only added 10 hp, but I wouldn't pay that much for either style or exclusivity.I think at about 700,000 dollars I'd take 2 ultimate aeros, seeing as how they're the fastest production car at the moment. And 1100 + hp sounds about right .[Edited on November 25, 2007 at 8:58 PM. Reason : sounds]
11/25/2007 8:57:19 PM
2 really good pics:If red Xs:http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-content/plugins/iimage-gallery.php?idpost=5704&idg=2&idi=1http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-content/plugins/iimage-gallery.php?idpost=5704&idg=2&idi=2
11/26/2007 5:38:20 PM
it's what batman would drive if the batmobile was in the shop
11/27/2007 3:08:26 AM
Mario williams should trade in his yellow piece of shit and get this.
11/27/2007 3:22:28 AM
11/27/2007 10:45:27 AM
11/27/2007 1:24:25 PM