1st build. haven't "fine tooth combed" it yet. hoping all the parts will fit together...figure i'd run it by tdub for review.motherboardhttp://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131146processorhttp://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103866PSUhttp://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817182032RAM (add more later...)http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820220228HDhttp://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136073video card (probably SLI another one at some point-can be done with this type of vcard?)http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814161174case (wondering about fitting the mb in this case with the middle fan dealio...)http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811166044
8/17/2007 12:36:20 AM
don't be afraid to shop around.
8/17/2007 12:38:05 AM
Get a different PSU. Rosewill makes nothing but crap. Don't cheap out on the one component that can kill all the rest.
8/17/2007 12:44:49 AM
I've had an NZXT 550W for the last 4 months & so far, so goodbut same for a 350W Roseill in my TV box for the last 6
8/17/2007 1:28:36 AM
8/17/2007 1:36:42 AM
/message_topic.aspx?topic=472002&page=5
8/17/2007 8:23:24 AM
Ooooh yeah, defin go intel. No discussion there. Better psu (i like OCZ), better performance ram, and pick a different case. Maybe the nvidia 8800gts 640 for the video card? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130071Of course it depends on what monitor you get/have. The 320 version will be alright for most resolutions until you start getting higher like 1920 by 1200 or 2560 by 1600. Maybe an antec case??http://www.antec.com/us/productDetails.php?ProdID=81803[Edited on August 17, 2007 at 9:20 AM. Reason : .]
8/17/2007 9:18:16 AM
This makes me want a new rig.
8/17/2007 9:35:31 AM
i was thinking that the expansion of the amd dual processor board would be something that would help down the road as apps go 64 bit, and cores go to quad. this amd board is compatible with the emerging q4 amd processors. but what is the deal with the intel vs amd processor debate? based on the responses, it seems that suitable ram, performance, and power concerns are what separates intel from amd right now?as far as the case goes, whatever works is good. i'm not sure if the fan in the middle of the case is good for space and design purposes, but i thought it would help with airflow.600 W will not power two dual processor cores? OK. well, back to the drawing board on that one. and thanks for the tip on the brand.and as far as the v-card goes, I was thinking about SLI two cheaper cards to get ~ 1G instead of paying for high-end cards right now...i was wavering between seagate and WD tooand thanks for the responses![Edited on August 17, 2007 at 11:47 AM. Reason : asldkfhsad]
8/17/2007 11:47:10 AM
intel's are faster, better buys and i believe the current platform is going to outlast AMD's.
8/17/2007 11:51:49 AM
right on, preciate it noen
8/17/2007 11:53:25 AM
8/17/2007 11:55:26 AM
SLI is only really worth it at the extreme high end (ie. getting 2 of the fastest, most expensive cards out). You're almost always better off getting the next fastest card in the lineup rather than 2 of the slower ones. You also have to take into consideration that SLI performance varies from game to game, and many games show little to no improvement at all.
8/17/2007 12:07:27 PM
^what he said..in the end you are better off paying more money for a good psu, a higher end dual core cpu (instead of dual socket cpu's), and a better high-end gpu (instead of dual gpu SLI)
8/17/2007 12:39:45 PM
8/17/2007 1:28:46 PM
I mean, clock for clock, the quad core Conroes perform just as well as the dual core ones in any game. It's just that the dual core ones overclock higher, run cooler, and use less power. They don't offer any real world advantage in any game out today though. However, with the price on them dropping to well under $300, and the fact that presumably future games will take advantage of them, you may as well get one if you're building a new system. Personally, I'd get a cheap dual core now and then upgrade to a quad core Penryn when those get released in the next few months.
8/17/2007 1:40:01 PM
i can all but promise you that games will not be taking advantage of quad core processors for years to come. most games today still don't take advantage of dual core cpu's.
8/17/2007 2:07:33 PM
8/17/2007 2:14:25 PM
http://www.technibble.com/why-you-should-avoid-cheap-power-supplies/
8/17/2007 2:20:10 PM
^^Sorry i made a generalization. Most of the time you shouldn't buy a power supply under 100 bucks, unless it's a good brand, and for a low wattage, less powerful computer. ^beat me to it. PSUs are one of the most important parts of a computer. You can buy a crappy 500w, and a nice 500w, and they'll be a world of difference between the two. One of the most common mistakes of a new computer builder is to see "600w" in the title and assume it's good simply because of that. Wattage is far from the only factor in what you should look for in a good psu. If there's one component you don't want to cheap out on, it's the power supply. It can literally screw up all the other components (from unneeded heat, and power fluctuations/stability issues) just like that article said ^. Melted pins suck.[Edited on August 17, 2007 at 2:40 PM. Reason : .]
8/17/2007 2:35:24 PM
CORSAIR XMS2 2GB (2 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 800 (PC2 6400) http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16820145034&CMP=AFC-Bensbargains$67.00 after $40.00 Mail-In Rebate if anybody's interested
8/17/2007 9:20:07 PM
Watch Fry's.com.I picked up 4 sticks of 1 GB Patriot DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 (low latency) for $35 a pop[Edited on August 17, 2007 at 10:11 PM. Reason : ^ or get that]
8/17/2007 10:11:24 PM
I agree with Prospero, actually I made nearly that exact system a few weeks ago
8/17/2007 10:22:39 PM