I did search and all the other HDMI cable threads are older than 90 days when I tried to post in them. So....I really don't know shit about HDMI cables except not to buy them at Best Buy because they are grossly overpriced. I'm looking at monoprice.com and which one should I get? 6 foot will probably work, but I could go 3 ft if the shorter cable is better. Whats the difference between HDMI and HDMI DVI?I just bought a new LCD tv and wanna get one.This cable: http://www.monoprice.com/products/product.asp?c_id=102&cp_id=10240&cs_id=1024004&p_id=2412&seq=1&format=2[Edited on July 8, 2007 at 5:22 PM. Reason : .]
7/8/2007 5:18:11 PM
i didn't get one that cheap but I bought a $12 6' cord on neweggit works great from my hd cable box to my LCD
7/8/2007 5:38:34 PM
hdmi dvi is a hdmi --> dvi adapter. dvi is a digital output on a lot of video cards these days. look up some pictures of the connectors and you'll see the difference.
7/8/2007 5:45:58 PM
shorter does not matter at all with hdmi or dvi.the signal going through them is digital. you either get the signal at the other end, or you don't. they're not like analog (component, composite, etc.) cables.
7/8/2007 5:54:21 PM
if you are near campusthe bookstore has great prices if you dont want to wait for shipping
7/8/2007 6:11:44 PM
I bought some of the super-cheap ones like that. I think I got 3 6-foot ones for $15 shipped, which is about the same price per cable that you listed. I've had no problem with them!
7/8/2007 6:14:23 PM
^^^ actually, the signal is digital, but higher quality cables DO make a difference for longer cable runsshort cables from monoprice will hold up just as well to the super overpriced Monster cables for under 6' distances. At longer distances the quality cables are needed.Pushing full 1080p bandwidth video over a cheap 50' HDMI cable will NOT worki'm looking for the link now, so I can back up this infolink one: http://bluejeanscable.com/articles/hdmi-cables.htmHere's the site reviewing Monster cables, and it shows for sure that shorter cables are more or less equal for HDMI, but for longer lengths quality mattershttp://gizmodo.com/gadgets/field-notes/the-truth-about-monster-cable-266616.phphttp://gizmodo.com/gadgets/hdmi-cable-battlemodo/the-truth-about-monster-cable-part-2-verdict-cheap-cables-keep-upusually-268788.php[Edited on July 8, 2007 at 8:18 PM. Reason : more links]
7/8/2007 8:11:35 PM
i just bought a 15' from monoprice... will report back
7/8/2007 8:20:33 PM
sigh, should i get a mid - gauge or the smaller gauge with dual ferrite cores?^^ btw
7/26/2007 11:27:16 AM
I'm looking to get a new TV in the next month or so. I've been researching around and stuff and a question I've come across is as follows. If I want to use the TV as a second monitor (the TV I'm getting will definitely be 1080p LCD of some sort, at least 40 inches) to watch movies from my computer and stuff, how much better quality will the picture be if I use an HDMI cable from my video card to the TV over just a regular VGA monitor cable?
7/26/2007 11:32:44 AM
significant dvi-d = hdmi for all intents and purposesVGA is limited by resolution and bandwidthif you have the horsepower (video card) and a good TV (1080p 1:1 pixel mapping over HDMI) then use a DVI to HDMI cablehttp://www.monoprice.com/products/product.asp?c_id=102&cp_id=10231&cs_id=1023104&p_id=2505&seq=1&format=2&style=is what you want, 15 feet FC and 28AWG (won't be so heavy to distort things physically...)[Edited on July 26, 2007 at 12:00 PM. Reason : s]
7/26/2007 11:58:07 AM