Why do they assume everything in the market is a function of supply and demand except labor?
6/6/2007 3:50:28 PM
I think its more like "jobs American employers don't want to paying a living wage for"
6/6/2007 3:53:49 PM
agreed.minimum wage should gradually be raised to $15 per hour or so.that way, everyone will be able to afford life.
6/6/2007 3:59:08 PM
^ Holy crap... $15/hour... there goes my college degree.
6/6/2007 4:05:06 PM
Now i'm really worried if $15/hour wasn't high enough to be obvious hyperbole....
6/6/2007 4:14:58 PM
lol
6/6/2007 4:20:10 PM
It is keeping wages artificially low. Much like slave labor in the Old South. This actually stifled economic development, because instead of relying on innovation/industrialization and increased efficiency, they could use cheap manual labor.
6/6/2007 5:35:41 PM
Get rid of government handouts and you'll see how quickly Americans will take those jobs.
6/6/2007 5:43:38 PM
6/6/2007 5:49:13 PM
minimum wage laws keep wages artificially high
6/6/2007 5:55:19 PM
6/6/2007 10:31:36 PM
um, because $6 a hour isn't enough to live on and those types of jobs don't provide benefits?
6/7/2007 12:31:42 PM
its enough for high school and college kids with summer jobs to live on in that stage of their livesyou know, the people who used to work all these jobs that "Americans don't want"]
6/7/2007 12:36:00 PM
There's millions of people in the US who make minimum wage and don't have their parents paying their rent, tuition, paying their insurance, putting gas in their car or giving them a little extra on the side. I love how idiot TWWers who have never been poor a day in their lives try to assert how they are some sort of poster child for free market success when they don't even participate in the market.
6/7/2007 12:46:48 PM
uh what?
6/7/2007 12:50:09 PM
I always hear people talk about government handouts, but isn't there something to be said for government supporting poor people? I mean, if we look back to the Great Depression, pre-welfare, weren't there a lot of folks just dying and doing even worse?I don't think that the government should provide endless supports for people, but a safety net for those who falter is important. I do have some issues with unemployment and welfare, but I don't think nearly as many people are just sitting back collecting a check as everyone thinks. I don't think I could ever collect welfare or unemployment. I just have to know that I have earned what I have in some way.
6/7/2007 12:51:53 PM
6/7/2007 12:54:54 PM
or me or anyone else on here
6/7/2007 1:11:58 PM
6/7/2007 1:12:45 PM
6/7/2007 1:17:16 PM
6/7/2007 2:17:25 PM
6/7/2007 2:32:17 PM
6/8/2007 12:06:21 AM
I remember the last time I was paid minimum wage......over a decade ago, at my very first job working fast food, for all of about 2 weeks before I got a raise.and this:
6/8/2007 12:22:11 AM
6/8/2007 12:31:11 AM
6/8/2007 12:38:59 AM
^^ fairly easy to do until you have to go to the hospital
6/8/2007 12:44:42 AM
^
6/8/2007 12:45:05 AM
^^
6/8/2007 12:47:54 AM
^^^The truth^^^^For the record, many apartments can be found in the campus area that are cheaper than dorms...
6/8/2007 2:00:07 AM
6/8/2007 7:09:19 AM
after reading through the posts here I'm trying to decide if it's even worth diving into...right now I'm thinking no.. I'll brave the headache after I get out of class
6/8/2007 7:33:58 AM
There have been studies focused on people who repeatedly go on and off of welfare, and they have found that the people are usually happy to have a low wage job w/o benefits, until someone in their family gets sick.
6/8/2007 9:12:39 AM
^ That's why providing stipends and passing tax breaks for the purchase of private insurance is a talking point.All nationalized health insurance will do is bring the level of care down for everyone.PS - Don't have babies if you can't afford diapers.I shouldn't be forced to pay for everybody else just because I worked hard and succeeded in life.Some people would rather have that pack of smokes per day instead of insurance, so in their case, I don't have any pity.PSS - http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/0,1299,DRMN_15_5215724,00.html[Edited on June 8, 2007 at 9:37 AM. Reason : .]
6/8/2007 9:20:17 AM
6/8/2007 10:12:33 AM
6/8/2007 10:16:54 AM
6/8/2007 10:22:30 AM
6/8/2007 10:37:53 AM
most people declare bankruptcy because of medical bills, not tv payments.
6/8/2007 10:41:47 AM
^b/c they order the digital cable, 2 packs of smokes a day, buying diapers for the baby they had when they were 16, they pimp their ride, etc....when they should be saving for an emergency or buying health insurance
6/8/2007 10:58:12 AM
6/8/2007 10:59:34 AM
6/8/2007 11:06:54 AM
6/8/2007 11:26:49 AM
6/8/2007 11:43:35 AM
Depends on where you live, too. You can live alot cheaper in Eastern NC or western Kansas than you can somewhere like NYC, DC, or even Raleigh...but don't act like you are doing it all without anyone's help when you are paying minimal taxes (EVERYONE uses some public services/assets) and would be bailed out by the general public directly or indirectly in a medical catastrophe.[Edited on June 8, 2007 at 11:54 AM. Reason : .]
6/8/2007 11:50:56 AM
^^^ good points.and i'll concede that there's very little incentive for people to change their excessive habits when they can receive so many free handouts. my dad once told me about how when he and my mom first got married, they'd be clipping coupons and getting by on boxes of hamburger helper while people with ebt cards would be coming to the check-out counter with steaks.but my points are addressing more the liveable wage. surely, raising the minimum wage to $7.15 an hour will help, and with a little foresight, anyone can budget according to their income. but a couple of emergency room visits or unexpected bills can knock you out if you don't have insurance or savings.i don't have the answers: i don't think putting too much money in the hands of irresponsible consumers would be any wiser than overly restricting free enterprise. but for god's sake, people are going to have children, they are going to hook up, have sex, and form families regardless of their income level. this bottom-of-the-barrel lifestyle that some of you are describing can work for single 20-somethings (i've been there myself), but realistically, it doesn't work for everyone.
6/8/2007 12:23:34 PM
6/8/2007 12:41:17 PM
no. actually i was thinking about myself:(from above)
6/8/2007 12:48:50 PM
6/8/2007 12:53:17 PM
6/8/2007 1:01:14 PM