now thats just annoying

3/7/2007 7:56:01 AM

thats not a fiero is it

3/7/2007 8:10:07 AM

UHH... its a Testarossa

3/7/2007 9:01:49 AM

3/7/2007 9:10:15 AM

it still has the carrier for it...

3/7/2007 9:20:21 AM

oh im not arguing with you.

3/7/2007 9:24:54 AM

i'm not saying that they didn't suck...but they've gotta be lighter and cheaper than airbags.

3/7/2007 9:36:04 AM

ah late 80s baby

thank god my parents never had a car with those, i hate 'em too. course their car only had LAP belts in the front

3/7/2007 10:57:13 AM

well of course, gov't regs.

btw my car has them

3/7/2007 1:26:17 PM

my dsm had them. didn't really bother me.

3/7/2007 1:37:49 PM

that moving seatbelt crap was a government regulation...
shit..

buncha morons i hate it when people know nothing about an industry and try to regulate its products anyway..


its like me saying microchips will not be allowed to go over 128 bit. I have little to no knowledge on what that would actually do i just know it has to be in the 2^x family

3/7/2007 1:54:47 PM

yeah, well if you want to get into that no seatbelt or airbag should be mandatory.

which i agree with.

3/7/2007 2:46:00 PM

IF I WANNA DIE IN A CRASH F*N LET ME.

3/7/2007 4:39:18 PM

Vehicles are required to have passive safety devices. At the time, automatic seatbelts were more convetional than airbags.

3/8/2007 5:44:03 AM

that's the point. automatic seatbelts are an asspain, but I wonder how much weight and money they save over airbags, if any.

3/8/2007 8:58:10 AM

my integra had them. kinda liked never forgot seat belt. top part at least.

3/8/2007 9:59:27 AM

i had a shitty car with them. they never had a problem.

3/8/2007 10:04:23 AM

i had a 88 camry with them, got a ticket once from a dickhead SHP cause i had the passive on and not the lapbelt.

3/8/2007 12:22:26 PM