3/4/2007 10:16:22 PM
WOLFPACK!hopefully I can pick this up on AM in Linville, somehow[Edited on March 4, 2007 at 10:18 PM. Reason : ;]
3/4/2007 10:18:06 PM
here's to hoping sidney can get em up for the tourney.
3/4/2007 10:21:35 PM
red blazer ftw
3/4/2007 10:22:23 PM
GO PACK, looking forward to it!
3/4/2007 10:58:47 PM
63-62 NC State
3/4/2007 11:06:09 PM
red blazer all the way
3/4/2007 11:07:11 PM
Do you believe? 75-62 State.
3/4/2007 11:09:27 PM
Our guys need to calm down and realize we match up at every position.
3/4/2007 11:24:08 PM
Raycom is suppose to show the whole tournament in HD. I would imagine it would be in HD on WRAL.
3/4/2007 11:26:08 PM
I'll be there, anything could happen depending on which NC State shows up.
3/4/2007 11:33:46 PM
Aww man
3/4/2007 11:41:50 PM
just hoping that a different team shows up for this game, rather than the one who showed up for the first match-up earlier this season
3/4/2007 11:46:42 PM
[Edited on March 4, 2007 at 11:49 PM. Reason : ]
3/4/2007 11:48:56 PM
state makes a run and beats duke and virginia and loses to VT...
3/4/2007 11:51:37 PM
we could beat dukebut we won't beat UVAbut we would beat VT
3/4/2007 11:53:57 PM
Well, if we have to lose, Losing to VT in the semifinals isn't a bad way to go.Because we know that Carolina won't win at least.
3/4/2007 11:54:33 PM
After the last game I really doubt we can win this oneThe last game against Duke, I mean[Edited on March 4, 2007 at 11:56 PM. Reason : .]
3/4/2007 11:55:52 PM
you didn't really need to qualify that
3/5/2007 12:04:46 AM
Everyone picks us to win?Have any of you been watching these games? Against Maryland or FSU we didn't even give a flying fuck.
3/5/2007 12:09:08 AM
^this is the ACCT, maybe we'll start giving a fuck
3/5/2007 12:10:15 AM
I would say State has about a 15% chance of victorybutthe women had 5% saturday, and they made it count
3/5/2007 2:02:43 AM
We have way better than a 15% chance to win.I'd say 30% is more realistic.We need to win this game to make up for our poor performance in the 2nd half of the ACC reg. season.
3/5/2007 2:40:14 AM
i'm not one for superstition... but we've all seen the coincidences.
3/5/2007 2:42:08 AM
3/5/2007 7:11:08 AM
Coincidences?Is Whittenburg coming back from an injury? There is no coincidence.
3/5/2007 7:13:27 AM
#7 in the acc and still top 20. thats a mean conference right there. i cant wait to see these games, jesus christ~
3/5/2007 7:45:27 AM
if there was a single team i was hoping we wouldnt have to play, it was duke.for some reason, we just never play them well.
3/5/2007 8:21:02 AM
well, if anyone can show them what can happen in the ACCT, it's Sid.
3/5/2007 8:55:59 AM
3/5/2007 9:01:12 AM
excuse me... i'm going to be a snarky nc state fan for a minute...we really got the best of both worlds on sunday, Hansbrough got bloodied and a duke player is suspended for our game... not a starter, but still, it reduces their depth some...
3/5/2007 9:08:50 AM
3/5/2007 11:07:03 AM
OverRatedThis game might actually be fun.
3/5/2007 11:09:58 AM
I may have to drive up to Tampa for this one. It will be worth the 4 and a half hour drive
3/5/2007 11:27:45 AM
i guess name is built into the rpi ratings too. we will turn the ball over too much with our lazy passes. when we play a team with good interior defense we rely heavily on great passing and perimeter play to win so when we play a team that has good interior defense and overplays the wings we lose. @unc maryland x2 and duke. the biggest headline coming off our win over unc was why didn't roy press.
3/5/2007 1:17:44 PM
Duke has a good resume. Definitely Top 30 and borderline Top 25 (especially since they have a good record against Top 50 teams but they are mostly lower end Top 50 teams), but the RPI is still a bit flawed. I made the same argument last year about the computer rankings for basketball (football is totally different).The rankings take into account the 175-250 games strongly over the 250-336 games. The reality is that any team in the Top 75 will EASILY destroy the 175-250 teams 99.99% of the time they would the 250-336 teams. Duke does a good job scheduling no one lower than 250, whereas teams like us schedule some 250-336 teams. There isn't much difference in real life b/t those category of teams on the court but to the computers there is a huge difference.If you watch a lot of basketball and come to the conclusion that Duke is a Top 10 team (like thier RPI) this year you are completely out of your mind..I think this is the best case for us. We just need to play with intensity and use our strengths over their weaknesses. That is make sure Grant and Fells get the freedom to create against Duke's unathletic backcourt. With the threat of Atsur there they should get much more freedom to create. Neither team is particularly deep (Duke has 4 players average 30 minutes they said yesterday) so I'm not worried about getting run off the court or worn down by 40 minutes of pressing like I would be by GTech.[Edited on March 5, 2007 at 1:27 PM. Reason : duke is 21, maryland is 20.. kind of funny that they are that close since UMd is CLEARLY better]
3/5/2007 1:24:12 PM
unathletic backcourt? paulus will be on atsur. grant and fells won't see him for the most part unlesss the lineup is them with horner costner and mccauley on the floor.mccauley and grant won't be a factor. costner will have a favorable matchup when thomas isn't in the game and will lead state in scoring. fells and atsur are going to have to step up with huge games for state to win.
3/5/2007 1:41:17 PM
3/5/2007 1:43:20 PM
Atsur isn't terribly athletic but he is a smarter player at this point than Paulus.Both Grant and Fells are more athletic than Scheyer by a wide margin.. but he is a smart player for a freshman. Whichever player Scheyer is on will have huge a matchup advantage.. it's just up to Atsur to get them the ball in the right places (i.e.- not in the corners where they can get trapped).Obviously Nelson at the 3 is very athetic but the loss of Henderson really does hurt Duke. They lose their second most athletic/explosive player and a guy who always play hard and has the athleticism to be a nightmare..I think Duke will probably end up winning by 2 or 3 in this one but I'll hold out on my prediction for now. I nailed the UNC-Duke game (well off by 1 point) so I'm feeling pretty good...
3/5/2007 1:50:22 PM
here we go again. every year people on the street talk about how dukes backcourt isn't athletic dating all the way back to duhon and ewing. paulus yes but nelson is insanely athletic and scheyer isn't the most athletic guy out there but you wouldn't call him unathletic.and wtf are you talking about behind ncsu? fells and grant are two of the most athletic players in the nation.then i realize its guns and he's a trickster anyway.[Edited on March 5, 2007 at 1:54 PM. Reason : ^duke by 8]
3/5/2007 1:53:35 PM
go pack!
3/5/2007 3:02:55 PM
3/5/2007 4:21:51 PM
Playmakers at 5:30then staying to watch UT lose to LSU
3/5/2007 4:24:01 PM
^was UT that good v Florida last week, or was Florida that bad?
3/5/2007 4:30:54 PM
nm[Edited on March 5, 2007 at 6:27 PM. Reason : .]
3/5/2007 6:26:58 PM
Go PACK!
3/6/2007 10:06:29 AM
A State win would be a great way to celebrate my bday.
3/6/2007 11:02:29 AM
additional broadcast schedulehttp://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/acc/sports/m-baskbl/auto_pdf/rlf07tourneythursday.pdf
3/6/2007 11:14:24 AM
Duke ALWAYS does well in the ACC tournament. Doesn't matter if half the players have the flu or gonorrhea... they still find a way to win
3/6/2007 11:21:59 AM
bttt
3/7/2007 9:51:13 AM