My apartment complex did a random apartment inspection last week and a few days later we started getting calls about signing a new "term sheet." Then today i get this email:
1/30/2007 8:53:12 PM
get a copy of your orginal leaseget a copy of the new lease (tell them you want to read it over before you sign it)go to a lawyer
1/30/2007 9:02:23 PM
I don't really care about the $25, especially not enough to ire a lawyer over it.
1/30/2007 9:03:10 PM
student legal services?
1/30/2007 9:08:11 PM
I'm not a student anymore.
1/30/2007 9:08:49 PM
what do you think they are trying to pull?
1/30/2007 9:09:55 PM
Did you pay $25 more than the lease specified or something?
1/31/2007 12:11:25 AM
Get a copy of old, copy of new, go compare.The only thing I can think of that they can pull is adding new terms or changing other terms in your lease to screw you over, and not mentioning that other things have changed (as there's nothing in there that says anything ELSE on the terms sheet DIDNT change). Normally marking things out and putting the new right thing and having signatures near it is what I thought was done for legal document corrections.It's fishy, i'd be suspicious that the new "term sheet" has something in it other than the new total.
1/31/2007 12:31:28 PM
1/31/2007 12:53:34 PM
^ Yeah, but they could just refund him the $25 that he overpaid instead of asking him to sign a new document.I'd definately be on the lookout for other changes being added in.
1/31/2007 12:56:02 PM
^Either way, he should talk to them about it before getting all "OMF I'M CALLING A LAWYER TO SUE JOO!" As crooked as property management companies may be, I doubt this one is going to go out of its way to steal $25 from a tenant.[Edited on January 31, 2007 at 1:00 PM. Reason : ./]
1/31/2007 12:59:29 PM
1/31/2007 1:05:03 PM
But $25 from many tenants tends to add up pretty quickly.
1/31/2007 1:07:07 PM
You should compare the new lease with the old one. Don't sign shit if you don't like anything new on there. They can't void your current lease if it's still valid.
1/31/2007 1:07:09 PM
^^^I was referring to everyone else's advice in the thread, not that it matters anyway.[Edited on January 31, 2007 at 1:07 PM. Reason : ^]
1/31/2007 1:07:18 PM
It wouldnt seem that out of place if they hadnt just done a surprise inspection. Maybe it has some new things they can fine you for that they noticed.
1/31/2007 3:42:28 PM
"Random" inspections aren't legal. Unless it's an emergency, a landlord can't just come into your house without some kind of notice.
1/31/2007 3:46:26 PM
^yes they can if it's in your lease.FYI: WolfCreek doesn't even need to knock to come in!
1/31/2007 3:55:45 PM
1/31/2007 5:33:35 PM
I think it is sketchy as hell.Would definitely compare the two.Anytime someone offers money incentive to change a written agreement, something is up. Why would they all of the sudden give back $25? Is that some kind of incentive to sign the new lease?What if they found a problem while inspecting and realized they were required to cover it by terms of the lease?
1/31/2007 7:33:30 PM