Thoughts? Anyone used these? Free Lossless Audio Codec...kinda big
1/17/2007 12:34:00 AM
huge for internet music snobs who trade music. they think its horrible that anyone downconverts into mp3's.if you have the time to download 700mb+ sets go for it, otherwise stick with other formats
1/17/2007 12:58:44 AM
I'm not a big enough elitist asshole to hawk that shitmaybe next monthI've still got terabytes to burn
1/17/2007 1:05:35 AM
If you want to archive music on your PC without losing quality due to conversion and lossy encoding, it's the only way to go.
1/17/2007 1:22:17 AM
how bout as far as burning to a CD? if i burn some flac files to cd will i be able to tell any audio difference from mp3s on a good stereo or not really?
1/17/2007 1:25:09 AM
^^I don't know if that's true all the time tho'.
1/17/2007 1:48:55 AM
I ripped my entire cd collection with using .flacThe average CD goes down to around 300mB which is a nice savings.^ This guy is clueless.I can tell the difference in a full quality track (.flac, .wav, etc) and a ~128 mp3 on my pretty weak PC speakers. I can tell a difference in most material at ~192 on my better home system, but when it gets to ~256 and above, it depends on the original source for me to start detecting it with my equipment (which is admittedly, not great stuff).I think if you are anal about it and want to keep the music exactly how you bought it, go with flac.
1/17/2007 8:35:23 AM
1/17/2007 8:36:35 AM
Pretty easy here, take a CD, rip to flac, rip to mp3, listen to both versions, if you notice a difference and it matters go with flac, if you dont really care about small details and just want sound go with mp3, i can tell a huge difference on some stuff, not so much on other stuff.
1/17/2007 9:50:06 AM