FSU is losing for the first time in a long time.Miami isnt what it used to be.Maryland is winningClemson, GT, VT, WF and BC are all good, if not great, this year.Is this the shape of things to come, or is the ACC that bad to where bad teams having good years can win?
11/6/2006 4:49:56 PM
the ACC rules the shitter this year, but its temporary, it will be back to a top 4 conference soon
11/6/2006 4:51:17 PM
acc is good in the middle. no great teams but the bottom 6 teams 4-10 in the acc could dominate any conf teams 4-10.
11/6/2006 4:54:46 PM
acc is dominateing in the nfl right now while the sec is dominating in college.we all are young and wait till we grow up
11/6/2006 4:59:37 PM
I hope your not saying our bottom 6 in our conference could beat the 4-10 of any other conference.
11/6/2006 4:59:52 PM
^not the bottom 6. the bottom 6 if unc and udke werent teams. teams 4-10 unc duke prolly couldnt beat anybbody
11/6/2006 5:00:36 PM
i dont have ANY problem with the teams that used to be mediocore being good and the usually great teams sucking, if they play good and they win, then they deserve to be at the top.
11/6/2006 5:00:38 PM
take away duke unc ohio state michigan usc cal texas tenn florida auburn arkansas lsu wvu and lousiville and any remaining acc team could contend in any other conference.
11/6/2006 5:02:47 PM
I'm pretty sure State(#10) would get pounded by LSU #4 in the sec[Edited on November 6, 2006 at 5:06 PM. Reason : .]
11/6/2006 5:03:38 PM
11/6/2006 5:09:20 PM
11/6/2006 5:09:29 PM
What strength??
11/6/2006 5:10:21 PM
Is it correct to think that the entire ACC is going to be way more competitive from now on, obviously not including duke and/or UNC.As in any team can beat any team on any given night, similar to ACC basketball.[Edited on November 6, 2006 at 5:11 PM. Reason : ghg]
11/6/2006 5:10:32 PM
For a conference that is supposed to be down this year, We have the same number of teams ranked that the SEC does. They are just ranked higher.[Edited on November 6, 2006 at 5:15 PM. Reason : .]
11/6/2006 5:15:11 PM
11/6/2006 5:16:19 PM
11/6/2006 5:16:23 PM
^^^ok...whats your point?you're basically saying we have a bunch of teams in the low 25, but thats ok b/c its the same number of teams as the sec, even though theirs are all in the top 15.^^ YOU CANT JUST GO TAKING OUT TEAMS AS YOU SEE FIT TO SUIT YOUR ARGUMENT. i'm sure louisville would love to take out tOSU or UM so they could be #2 in the country, but it DOESNT WORK LIKE THAT.[Edited on November 6, 2006 at 5:19 PM. Reason : ^]
11/6/2006 5:17:44 PM
Whatever, the ACC is clearly the best conference. The teams are just beating up on each other.
11/6/2006 5:19:00 PM
sec is way better but the rest of the conferences arent. they all are top heavy with 2 teams^ya, wake would be unbeaten if clemson wasnt so good that daybc would be unbeaten if ncstate and wake wernet so goodclemson would be.....you get where im going[Edited on November 6, 2006 at 5:20 PM. Reason : acc beat up each other. pac 10 big 10 big 12 big east are all top HEAVY]
11/6/2006 5:19:04 PM
ok, well, take out LSU, Florida and Auburn and Tenn would be playing in the national championship game in 2 months [Edited on November 6, 2006 at 5:23 PM. Reason : f]
11/6/2006 5:22:09 PM
No way dude, Tenn will lose 2 more times b4 the year is out
11/6/2006 5:24:36 PM
I could see arkansas... but who else?
11/6/2006 5:25:33 PM
UT won't lose another game with Ainge back at QB.I hope you know that they (UT) SHOULD have beaten LSU with a freshman backup QB.
11/6/2006 5:26:40 PM
^^^^^ i see where you're going, but out of the four conferences you listed, each has at least 3 teams that could beat ANY team from the acc. so i fail to see how the acc is a better conference. i'd rather the acc be top heavy as shit rather than not heavy at all.[Edited on November 6, 2006 at 5:27 PM. Reason : ^]
11/6/2006 5:27:31 PM
i say an upset at Vandy!
11/6/2006 5:27:33 PM
11/6/2006 5:28:12 PM
lol
11/6/2006 5:28:39 PM
^^ hahahaha....and Ainge isnt definitely back yet...
11/6/2006 5:29:44 PM
if you get rid of everyone who has A's and B's and ignore all those F's, my high C looks pretty good compared to the C's and D's that are left.[Edited on November 6, 2006 at 5:32 PM. Reason : but it is ok, cuz im not comparing the dregs of the F's with my C]
11/6/2006 5:31:38 PM
whose to say acc is bad? preseason rankings? if wake mayrlnad bc vt and gt started off as high as the sec the acc would look better right now. FACT.i think we have a winning record vs them and gt will beat uga clemson will beat usc. wake destroyed @ole miss. duke almsot beat bama. what makes the sec so good?the secs statement win was cal @ tenn. why so impressive? why is cal so good? who have they ever beat sincce that 1 usc win?usc destoryed a divisional leader in the sec?who have florida auburn lsu beaten? are theese teams just great by defualt? great because they beat each other and only lose to each other?great because they beat the other teams in the conference? why cant i say the other teams in the conference just arent as good as the other teams in the acc?duke did almost beat bama. wake did destroy ole miss.its a 2 way street here. media wins
11/6/2006 5:39:12 PM
11/6/2006 5:42:07 PM
no, if you really know football (which you have made it clear you dont) you can tell what is better product by watching the games. You can see the depth, the team speed, etc.Its the same thing with bball... sure Florida won last year, and LSU and Tennessee had suprising years etc, but on average, SEC basketball cannot compare with ACC. If you watch the games, you can see the difference.[Edited on November 6, 2006 at 5:45 PM. Reason : d]
11/6/2006 5:42:36 PM
To really know, we would need more games with better opponents outside the ACC
11/6/2006 5:45:43 PM
miami has some of the most depth and team speed in the country. that works out well. you really can't tell until the teams play. wake forest and bc play some of the most sound discipline football in the nationlast year fsu was so bad but they went toe to toe with penn statedidnt vt crush louisville?im saying we don't know. if preseason rankings put those 5 acc teams in the top 15 acc would be the best conference in football right now...factjust because the media was wrong about who would be good in the acc makes teh acc bad?
11/6/2006 5:48:36 PM
http://www.armchairgm.com/mwiki/index.php?title=2006_NFL_Players:_College_Alumni_TournamentThe SEC alumni of this year are undefeated. And I cannot find it, but I am almost CERTAIN that the SEC has the most players in the NFL and not the ACC. [Edited on November 6, 2006 at 5:50 PM. Reason : You wanted something other than SEC is good here it is.]
11/6/2006 5:49:33 PM
if we're gonna talk about wake destroying ole miss why not talk about vandy destroying duke?duke did well at bama. shrug kentucky was able to score 28 at louisville. wasnt close, but thats not bad.none of this crap down at the bottom really matters. you're only decent point might be about USC beating arkansas.you see the SEC has teams that have NATIONALLY recognized defensive stats. that makes them harder to score on and thus beat. so beating up on each other (ex. UF beating UGA, LSU, UT, and putting up a good fight at Auburn) is impressive.[Edited on November 6, 2006 at 5:51 PM. Reason : ^ i think the last game i saw they said ACC had more]
11/6/2006 5:49:49 PM
The SEC has better coaches.
11/6/2006 5:50:17 PM
^^^^ GOD DAMMIT YOU STUPID FUCK. DO YOU OWN A FUCKING TV? DO YOU ACTUALLY WATCH THE GAMES OR DO YOU JUST MAKE UP SHIT? THE ACC DOESNT HAVE 5 TOP 15 CALIBER TEAMS. NOT EVEN CLOSE. I DONT CARE IF THEY WERE PRESEASON 1-5 OR 100-105.[Edited on November 6, 2006 at 5:51 PM. Reason : D]
11/6/2006 5:50:53 PM
What's the biggest OOC win the ACC has? Seems like I only remember us beating up on shit teams.
11/6/2006 5:51:43 PM
5^ That statement is false. Totally opinionated.[Edited on November 6, 2006 at 5:52 PM. Reason : .]
11/6/2006 5:52:10 PM
ya but those defensive rankings dont mean anything to me unless they are against the competition im comparing them to. all those numbers are against midmajors and sec teams so htey don't say much.ole misses good d being lit up by wake says somethingarkansas all pro d being lit up by usc says something
11/6/2006 5:52:44 PM
^ you cant be this dumb. It has to be a joke.
11/6/2006 5:54:04 PM
dumb because i question the sec being so damn good? there is no good reason why lsu florida arkansas tenn and auburn are so much better than wake bc vt maryland and gt. no reason at all.
11/6/2006 5:56:07 PM
hahaha
11/6/2006 5:56:46 PM
hahahaha, yeah, because if they all played each other 10 times the sec would win 7 out of 10.Florida and Auburn would obliterate any of those teamsLSU, Tenn would obliterate all of them except for maybe GT and VT if they actually showed up to play.Arkansas would be the only toss up[Edited on November 6, 2006 at 5:59 PM. Reason : d]
11/6/2006 5:57:51 PM
11/6/2006 5:58:00 PM
lol @
11/6/2006 5:59:15 PM
the stats are actually closer than i thought. between offensive and defensive stat, looking at the top 5, the SEC is only placed 2 times more than the ACC. unfortunately all but 1 of the ACC's top 5 stat rankings are from VT, while the SEC's is spread amongst LSU, Auburn, and UF with one from Arkansas.
11/6/2006 6:00:23 PM
^^^ yes it is. I cant stand a homer fan who just totally ignores any objectivity.[Edited on November 6, 2006 at 6:01 PM. Reason : d]
11/6/2006 6:01:00 PM
tell me why they are better all you laughers. go ahead. preseason rankings is all they have.
11/6/2006 6:01:01 PM