User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » Best file compression software? Page [1]  
superchevy
All American
20874 Posts
user info
edit post

what program will yield the greatest compression percentages, is easy to use, takes up minimal harddrive space, and doesn't hog system resources when running? it'd be a bonus if it was 100% free, but a limited free version or a trial period version is fine too.

10/31/2006 4:37:12 PM

Noen
All American
31346 Posts
user info
edit post

so you want realtime compression?

Turn on compressed files in windows, it's built in. Not going to get significantly better than that, and if you have mostly videos/mp3's/etc, it's not going to make hardly any difference, other than slowing your system down 5-10%.

10/31/2006 4:41:51 PM

MiniMe_877
All American
4414 Posts
user info
edit post

7-zip from http://www.7-zip.org/

best compression
most compression options
fast decompression
free

10/31/2006 7:20:16 PM

synapse
play so hard
60939 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"takes up minimal harddrive space"


who cares about this these days?

and for these type of programs, you might be looking at 8MB of space vs 23MB of space. whats the difference?

10/31/2006 8:53:11 PM

wwwebsurfer
All American
10217 Posts
user info
edit post

7-Zip... hands down...

10/31/2006 9:14:47 PM

quagmire02
All American
44225 Posts
user info
edit post

does 7-zip support multi-part creation? how fast is the initial compression?

10/31/2006 11:00:11 PM

goalielax
All American
11252 Posts
user info
edit post

7-zip allows you to split to volumes - 3.5", 650MB CD, 700MB CD, or 4.48G DVD

10/31/2006 11:39:50 PM

Noen
All American
31346 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"best compression
most compression options
fast decompression
free"


Except for compressing pure ASCII text files, winrar has better compression.
Most compression options? What the hell does more options even do for you?
Winrar decompresses considerably faster, with far less memory usage
Nagware, but still usable for free

7-Zip is just another fad. WinRar is still the best file archiving option.

11/1/2006 2:03:15 AM

El Nachó
special helper
16370 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Winrar decompresses considerably faster, with far less memory usage"


Truth.

11/1/2006 9:52:27 AM

MiniMe_877
All American
4414 Posts
user info
edit post

^^ 7-zip consistently beats out WinRAR in text compression, I just ran a test between WinZIP, WinRAR, and 7-zip on my machine here at work and 7z won by a landslide. Look it up yourselves, you people know how to use Google

it also allows you more control of compression settings, and shows you how much memory will be used to compress and decompress at those settings

7-zip is the clear winner for max compression, not to mention its free and not nagware

[Edited on November 1, 2006 at 10:08 AM. Reason : prove me wrong Noen]

11/1/2006 10:07:44 AM

Noen
All American
31346 Posts
user info
edit post

Did you even READ my post?

Except for compressing pure ASCII text files, winrar has better compression.

7-Zip is better for ASCII files, WinRAR is better for anything binary.

Quote :
"it also allows you more control of compression settings, and shows you how much memory will be used to compress and decompress at those settings
"


What is the point of all this "control of compression settings"? Once again you are talking about absolute miniscule differences. Having Fastest, Fast, Slow, Slower and Maximum pretty much covers the gamut.

Who the fuck cares if a compression program SHOWS you how much memory it's hogging? It still uses orders of magnitude more memory to compress AND decompress than WinRAR and it's SLOWER.

Also, WinRAR occasionally gives away previous versions for free.

[Edited on November 1, 2006 at 10:40 AM. Reason : .]

11/1/2006 10:40:02 AM

El Nachó
special helper
16370 Posts
user info
edit post

This may be nitpicky, but I refused to use 7-zip early on because of it's horrible GUI. Seriously it was like pulling teeth to navigate through that software. It may have gotten better since the last time I tried it, but I'll never find out.

11/1/2006 10:59:28 AM

Noen
All American
31346 Posts
user info
edit post

^Yea its pretty terrible.

11/1/2006 11:05:55 AM

MiniMe_877
All American
4414 Posts
user info
edit post

my bad, I misread your post Noen

according to http://www.maximumcompression.com/, it looks like WinRK 3.0.3 beats out everything

11/1/2006 11:09:11 AM

gs7
All American
2354 Posts
user info
edit post

^sure, it beats out everything based on compression, but it's also proprietary. that aspect aside, however, what should really be looked at is efficiency, click for the list sorted as such:

http://www.maximumcompression.com/data/summary_mf2.php#data

notice that WinRAR is right there at the top, then compare the difference between it and 7-zip (and all the others). it's the reason why RAR files have been around so long, and are very popular with people who regularly compress files. WinACE tried to take the crown years ago just as 7-zip is trying today, but it will die out just like the others. the numbers on that chart speak the truth. good find, MiniMe_877

[Edited on November 1, 2006 at 11:59 AM. Reason : .]

11/1/2006 11:58:14 AM

smoothcrim
Universal Magnetic!
18966 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Except for compressing pure ASCII text files, winrar has better compression.
Most compression options? What the hell does more options even do for you?
Winrar decompresses considerably faster, with far less memory usage
Nagware, but still usable for free

7-Zip is just another fad. WinRar is still the best file archiving option."

11/1/2006 12:04:26 PM

 Message Boards » Tech Talk » Best file compression software? Page [1]  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.39 - our disclaimer.