what program will yield the greatest compression percentages, is easy to use, takes up minimal harddrive space, and doesn't hog system resources when running? it'd be a bonus if it was 100% free, but a limited free version or a trial period version is fine too.
10/31/2006 4:37:12 PM
so you want realtime compression?Turn on compressed files in windows, it's built in. Not going to get significantly better than that, and if you have mostly videos/mp3's/etc, it's not going to make hardly any difference, other than slowing your system down 5-10%.
10/31/2006 4:41:51 PM
7-zip from http://www.7-zip.org/best compressionmost compression optionsfast decompressionfree
10/31/2006 7:20:16 PM
10/31/2006 8:53:11 PM
7-Zip... hands down...
10/31/2006 9:14:47 PM
does 7-zip support multi-part creation? how fast is the initial compression?
10/31/2006 11:00:11 PM
7-zip allows you to split to volumes - 3.5", 650MB CD, 700MB CD, or 4.48G DVD
10/31/2006 11:39:50 PM
11/1/2006 2:03:15 AM
11/1/2006 9:52:27 AM
^^ 7-zip consistently beats out WinRAR in text compression, I just ran a test between WinZIP, WinRAR, and 7-zip on my machine here at work and 7z won by a landslide. Look it up yourselves, you people know how to use Googleit also allows you more control of compression settings, and shows you how much memory will be used to compress and decompress at those settings7-zip is the clear winner for max compression, not to mention its free and not nagware[Edited on November 1, 2006 at 10:08 AM. Reason : prove me wrong Noen]
11/1/2006 10:07:44 AM
Did you even READ my post?Except for compressing pure ASCII text files, winrar has better compression.7-Zip is better for ASCII files, WinRAR is better for anything binary.
11/1/2006 10:40:02 AM
This may be nitpicky, but I refused to use 7-zip early on because of it's horrible GUI. Seriously it was like pulling teeth to navigate through that software. It may have gotten better since the last time I tried it, but I'll never find out.
11/1/2006 10:59:28 AM
^Yea its pretty terrible.
11/1/2006 11:05:55 AM
my bad, I misread your post Noenaccording to http://www.maximumcompression.com/, it looks like WinRK 3.0.3 beats out everything
11/1/2006 11:09:11 AM
^sure, it beats out everything based on compression, but it's also proprietary. that aspect aside, however, what should really be looked at is efficiency, click for the list sorted as such:http://www.maximumcompression.com/data/summary_mf2.php#datanotice that WinRAR is right there at the top, then compare the difference between it and 7-zip (and all the others). it's the reason why RAR files have been around so long, and are very popular with people who regularly compress files. WinACE tried to take the crown years ago just as 7-zip is trying today, but it will die out just like the others. the numbers on that chart speak the truth. good find, MiniMe_877[Edited on November 1, 2006 at 11:59 AM. Reason : .]
11/1/2006 11:58:14 AM
11/1/2006 12:04:26 PM