10/3/2006 12:42:11 AM
no complaintsakroyd needs workernie hudson is actually doing alright, though
10/3/2006 12:46:12 AM
never gonna happenand if it does it'll be a complete travesty compared to the original
10/3/2006 1:45:24 AM
link?
10/3/2006 2:26:18 AM
http://filmforce.ign.com/articles/708/708806p1.html
10/3/2006 8:42:55 AM
...because part 2 was sooooo good.
10/3/2006 9:37:17 AM
^thats just scaryand why is she missing a hand
10/3/2006 9:38:39 AM
Jacob Reading is my new favorite screenwriter.
10/3/2006 9:39:58 AM
Ben Stillerim interested
10/3/2006 9:47:26 AM
Bill Murray not being interested confuses me. After he signed to do ONE Garfield movie (let alone 2), I thought he would be willing to sellout to anything.I can actually see Ben Stiller taking his place as an actor, but I don't know if I can accept it.
10/3/2006 10:58:19 AM
First off Garfield was a voiceover. Easy, safe, money. If the movie flops nobody associates your face with the movie, plus it's a freaking kids movie. It's comparable to doing charity work for most actors. Who's seriously going to rip apart Bill for doing a crappy kids movie.[Edited on October 3, 2006 at 11:05 AM. Reason : asdf]
10/3/2006 11:05:32 AM
the voice of garfield on the cartoon was the same guy who did the voice of peter on the ghostbusters cartoon, but I believe he passed away several years ago
10/3/2006 11:18:20 AM
That is very interesting if it's true.
10/3/2006 11:39:11 AM
it's true.
10/3/2006 1:32:46 PM
10/3/2006 1:38:11 PM
they could all be kinda old nowand Ben Stiller could be Oscarbut we need Louis Tulley in this movie, its just not right without him
10/3/2006 1:51:39 PM
OPERATION GHOSTBUSTER!
10/3/2006 3:55:56 PM
I like the idea posed at the end of the Ramis quote:
10/3/2006 4:52:33 PM