Hardly a day goes by that the press, radio and television don't mention something about the 1500 alleged to have drowned. The figure is nonsense but media folk go on parroting what everyone "knows".

There have been many other disasters at sea, and most of them have hardly warranted a paragraph, let alone movies. Has anyone made a film about the 1,200 killed on board the RMS Lusitania, or the death of 1,100 on the RMS Empress of Ireland? Just look at the unusually long list of films that have been made about this alleged tragedy alone! What other maritime tragedy has warranted such a barrage of Hollywood propaganda, not to mention hundreds and hundreds of books and articles, as have surrounded the alleged Titanic? Lots of people have died in many sea disasters. The Northern Shipwreck Database has archived more than 65,000 records of marine casualties over the last four centuries! What makes the suffering of the Titanic so special?

All of this has culminated in James Cameron's production. After eighty-five years the moguls of the movie world reckoned the time was right to cash in in a big way. And Cameron reckoned it was time for him to cash in too. "Movie of the year! Cameron takes on the Titanic!", screamed the cover-page in Newsweek magazine.

This film, however, contains so many flaws and inconsistencies that it is absolutely worthless as a credible historical piece. Let's start with the fact that the two principal characters, alleged to have had a dramatic love affair aboard the doomed vessel, were, in fact, simply names picked at random from the ship's manifests. There is no evidence that these two persons even met during the actual voyage.

The truth is revealed when one watches the end-credits of the movie. Stashed away, in tiny letters, shown only after most people would be expected to have already left the theater, is the fateful disclaimer:

Quote :

"Characters, places and incidents in this film are fictitous. Any resemblance to actual events, locales or persons, living or dead, is entirely coincidental."

Even the filmmakers are forced to admit that this movie - purporting to represent a historical event - is, in fact, a work of FICTION, just like Amadeus and Schindler's List!

Am I suggesting that the boat did not sink, or that dozens, maybe hundreds of people didn't get wet and cold and maybe even broke an ankle? No. But propaganda is selective, and Hollywood propaganda is the most selective of all. There is no physical evidence that 1500 went down with the ship.

The ship was probably scuttled after all the passengers and crew were safely aboard the lifeboats. They all escaped and filed monstrous insurance claims. The whole thing is a titanic insurance hoax.

That is why the tear in the hull allegedly caused by an iceberg has never been found. All the hull damage that has been found and documented could have been caused by the ship hitting the sea floor. And where, exactly, is this so-called iceberg? How can revisionists be expected to accept that 1500 people were killed if the very instrument of their destruction is not even available for examination?

Based on a complete lack of physical evidence alone, it is safe to dismiss the conventional Titanic story.

7/27/2006 3:31:24 PM

I see what you did there. lol

7/27/2006 3:33:42 PM

link plz

7/27/2006 3:34:42 PM

http://www.revisionism.nl/The-Mad-Revisionist.htm

7/27/2006 3:35:40 PM

And, I know that I'll hear from them for this. But, throwing God out successfully with the help of the federal court system, throwing God out of the public square, out of the schools. The abortionists have got to bear some burden for this because God will not be mocked. And when we destroy 40 million little innocent babies, we make God mad. I really believe that the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, People For the American Way - all of them who have tried to secularize America - I point the finger in their face and say "you helped this happen."

7/27/2006 3:44:41 PM

VERY INTERESTING, PLEASE FOWARD

7/27/2006 3:47:27 PM

THE TITANIC - The REAL Truth
In 1898 a struggling author named Morgan Robertson concocted a novel called "Futility" about a fabulous Atlantic liner, far larger than any that had been built.

No more than fourteen years later a British shipping company named the White Star Line built a steamer remarkably like the one in Robertson's novel.

-The new liner was 66,000 tons displacement; Robertson's was 70,000 tons.

-The real ship was 882ft and 9in long; the fictional one was 800ft.

-Both vessels were triple screw and could make 24 - 25 knots.

-Both could carry about 3,000 people and both had enough lifeboats for only a fraction of this number. But, then, this didn't seem to matter because they were both labeled "unsinkable".

-The fictional boat was wrecked one cold April night on an iceberg. On April 10, 1912 the real ship left Southampton on her maiden voyage to New York. On her way over she too struck an iceberg and went down.

-Robertson called his ship the Titan; the White Star Line called its ship the Titanic.

Now we know exactly where the conspirators got the inspiration for their Titanic insurance hoax.

http://www.revisionism.nl/Titanic/Titanic1.htm

7/27/2006 4:20:41 PM

we also didn't land on the moon when they said we did

and its made of cheese

7/27/2006 4:25:54 PM

But what if it was made of barbecue spare ribs, would you eat it then?

7/27/2006 4:28:38 PM

7/27/2006 4:29:28 PM

You all need to wake up. The "moon" does not exist.

It is a fabrication of the controlled media.

http://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/The-Mad-Revisionist.htm

7/27/2006 4:31:36 PM

it was aliens.

they don't want you to know!

7/27/2006 4:50:15 PM

You've seen pictures of the giza pyramids, but have you ever really been to Egypt? All fake. It's a giant scam the country invented to cash in on tourism. Those people are standing next to 10-foot billboards that create an optical illusion.

Use your heads people. The ancient Egyptians didn't have fucking wheels, and archeological evidence shows they didn't have nearly enough slaves to assemble the structures as they are portrayed. Floating the bricks on the Nile? Those things would've weighed 20 tons a piece, and they expect us to think they floated them on little straw canoes?

Go on GoogleMaps. Do you see them?

http://maps.google.com/maps?q=egypt&ie=UTF8&oe=UTF-8&ll=24.194364,32.0121&spn=0.444067,0.862427&t=k&om=1
http://maps.google.com/maps?q=egypt&ie=UTF8&oe=UTF-8&t=k&om=1&ll=25.281333,32.569656&spn=0.440202,0.862427
http://maps.google.com/maps?q=egypt&ie=UTF8&oe=UTF-8&t=k&om=1&ll=21.224102,32.178955&spn=0.907609,1.724854
http://maps.google.com/maps?q=egypt&ie=UTF8&oe=UTF-8&t=k&om=1&ll=37.240032,-115.800018&spn=0.096892,0.215607

Where are they? Suspiciously not present wherever I look.


[Edited on July 29, 2006 at 12:14 AM. Reason : -]

7/29/2006 12:09:57 AM

Quote :

"I see what you did there. lol"

[Edited on July 29, 2006 at 1:08 AM. Reason : on an unrelated side note, I never realized how close the pyramids were to the city ]

7/29/2006 1:04:26 AM

Quote :

"DISCLAIMER: All editorial content on this website is strictly not the writer’s/author’s opinion. THE MAD REVISIONIST, located on the moon, is owned and operated by accident. The content of this page is the copyrighted property of THE MAD REVISIONIST. Any illegal copying or circulating of this page, in whole or in part, without the expressed permission of THE MAD REVISIONIST will be taken as a compliment. And if you want to know how the movie ends... the boat sinks."

hahahaha

7/29/2006 1:39:34 AM

SHOCKING SMOKING GUN



The Titanic establishment often cites eyewitness testimonies as proof of their version of the Titanic story. However, careful revisionist examination of these testimonies has shown them to be largely composed of irresponsible fabrications. In fact, these documents support the revisionist perspective that the sinking of the Titanic is really an elaborate insurance hoax. When one reads the documents generated by so-called "Titanic survivors", one is struck by the obvious fact that these people were really concerned only with money and compensation for goods allegedly lost in this supposed disaster. Yet, despite these demands, and their libelous implications, they do not offer so much as ONE SHRED of forensic evidence to back up their claim that the ship hit an iceberg.

http://www.revisionism.nl/Titanic/Titanic2.htm

8/2/2006 3:16:49 PM

Why are people so afraid of the truth?

8/2/2006 3:24:05 PM

Holy shit.

How did I miss the cheese connection before?!?!

Quote :

" 40 cases of Roquefort Cheese $800"

[Edited on August 2, 2006 at 3:31 PM. Reason : .]

8/2/2006 3:26:59 PM

Quote :

"40 cases of Roquefort Cheese $800"

that's great and so is this thread

8/3/2006 9:10:29 AM

cholesterol doesn't really exist

8/3/2006 10:20:11 AM

Spachula: Might help if you were looking in the right place

http://maps.google.com/maps?q=egypt&ie=UTF8&oe=UTF-8&ll=24.194364,32.0121&spn=0.444067,0.862427&t=k&om=1

8/3/2006 10:33:58 AM

so it was almost 100 years ago, and everyone's dead now.

who gives a shit?

8/3/2006 1:35:30 PM

That's the point, they're not dead...I mean they are now but not then. See.......

I don't understand why you people can't get that.

[Edited on August 3, 2006 at 1:47 PM. Reason : s]

8/3/2006 1:47:12 PM

no I got it. But I don't care.

8/3/2006 1:49:37 PM

I was kidding and I don't really care either.

8/3/2006 2:52:11 PM

So wait if they are dead how do they get paid?

8/3/2006 3:43:45 PM

According to the official Titanic dogma, 1500 went down with the ship. But this does not match the actual physical evidence that was recovered from the scene.

How many bodies were actually found? Well, I don't know. But I can guarantee you that it was only a fraction of the 1500 number touted by the establishment propagandists.

Yet the media establishment continues to repeat the fraudulent 1500 number ad nauseum. How do they come to the conclusion that the number killed was 1500? You are in for a shock, dear reader, at the shoddiness of their methodology. They simply counted the number of people alleged to have been on the boat, and SUBTRACTED THE NUMBER OF SURVIVORS!

The flaw in this logic should be apparent. The mere fact that a number of people are unaccounted for does not automatically prove that they drowned when their ship hit an iceberg. Dozens of children go missing every year; does the fact that their faces appear on milk cartons automatically lead you to assume that they drowned when their ship hit an iceberg? Yet that is the line that the Titanic propagandists expect you to swallow. This despite the fact that they don't have a SINGLE WITNESS who actually saw someone in the physical act of drowning.

8/15/2006 3:31:07 PM

Quote :

"They simply counted the number of people alleged to have been on the boat, and SUBTRACTED THE NUMBER OF SURVIVORS! "

If I had known this was the way they computed the death toll, I would have agreed with you a long time ago.... Thanks for the heads up on this issue. From now on, I will be watching for the Titanic Coverup

8/15/2006 3:41:56 PM

no way - i thought the movie was completely factual

8/15/2006 4:13:05 PM

^^^ that is the worst set of logical reasoning I have ever, in my life. Not their logic of counting the dead, but that whole child missing=down with ship.

Horrible

0/10.

go to your room.

8/15/2006 4:21:12 PM

^ Does everyone see this? Abonorio is trying to silence me because of my views.

You can't silence the movement. More and more people are waking up to the truth everyday.

8/15/2006 4:26:03 PM

ahahahaha, i got in on this late. I see what's going on. gg.

8/15/2006 4:28:13 PM

abonorio is obviously just another MIND-SLAVE following the titanic overlords like the rest of the sheep

8/16/2006 7:21:36 AM

Even the Titani-huggers now admit that when the Carpathia arrived on the scene the lifeboats WERE NOT FILLED TO CAPACITY!!!!

Were expected to believe 1500 people lounged around on the deck of a sinking ship listening to a string quartet and waiting to die while life boats sailed away only PARTIALLY FILLED!!! ROTFLOL!!!

This is complete nonsense that only a TRUE BELIEVER TITANI-HUGGER would entertain for more than a second!!!

And where were the bodies of the supposed victims? The crew of the Carpathia found very few. Where did the all go? Were they carted off by space aliens???

INCREDIBLE!!! And there's more!!!

First they said that the iceberg had ripped a gash in the side of the ship. Now, there saying that it buckled the plates and popped the rivets. Can't they get their stories straight???

A disaster that didn't cost a lot of people their lives wouldn't sell many books or movies. We know who stands to gain by this conspiracy and its high time we exposed this FRAUD and the Titani-huggers behind it.

9/7/2006 3:35:32 PM

Here it comes...




























Wait for it.........























The White Star Line.

COINCIDENCE?

9/7/2006 4:02:59 PM

When paired with the now famous smoking gun that is the Roquefort Cheese Memo, it is clear to all but the most brainwashed what happened on that fateful night in 1912.



[Edited on September 7, 2006 at 4:06 PM. Reason : .]

9/7/2006 4:05:53 PM

Quote :

"Roquefort Cheese Memo"

Cheese...

9/7/2006 4:10:51 PM

what is going on here? looked like it tarted as a seriously thread now is just a joke? oris the whole thing a jokethatdhouslbelocked?

9/7/2006 4:28:59 PM

Just look at the unusually long list of films that have been made about this alleged tragedy alone!

http://www.amazon.com/s/102-5214010-3518561?ie=UTF8&keywords=titanic&tag=themadrevisioni&index=video&link%5Fcode=qs

What other maritime tragedy has warranted such a barrage of Hollywood propaganda, not to mention hundreds and hundreds of books and articles, as have surrounded the alleged Titanic? Lots of people have died in many sea disasters. The Northern Shipwreck Database has archived more than 65,000 records of marine casualties over the last four centuries! What makes the suffering of the Titanic so special?

10/24/2006 2:57:48 PM

Quote :

"Go on GoogleMaps. Do you see them? http://maps.google.com/maps?q=egypt&ie=UTF8&oe=UTF-8&ll=24.194364,32.0121&spn=0.444067,0.862427&t=k&om=1 http://maps.google.com/maps?q=egypt&ie=UTF8&oe=UTF-8&t=k&om=1&ll=25.281333,32.569656&spn=0.440202,0.862427 http://maps.google.com/maps?q=egypt&ie=UTF8&oe=UTF-8&t=k&om=1&ll=21.224102,32.178955&spn=0.907609,1.724854 http://maps.google.com/maps?q=egypt&ie=UTF8&oe=UTF-8&t=k&om=1&ll=37.240032,-115.800018&spn=0.096892,0.215607 Where are they? Suspiciously not present wherever I look."

You got me curious, but LOL ... sorry to bust your bubble, I actually see them (that is if you are talking about the famous pyramids)...

Go to: http://maps.google.com
Type: giza, egypt
Scroll: Down and to the right left a little

[Edited on October 24, 2006 at 3:55 PM. Reason : i'm dyslexic]

10/24/2006 3:46:40 PM

Quote :

" Lots of people have died in many sea disasters. The Northern Shipwreck Database has archived more than 65,000 records of marine casualties over the last four centuries! What makes the suffering of the Titanic so special?"

How about the fact that it was the biggest and most luxurious ship of it's time and the builder's declared it unsinkable. You have to admit, there's a story in there somewhere.

10/24/2006 5:08:29 PM

alright, this is kinda funny

but i still have to lock it

10/24/2006 5:51:27 PM