The UN added fucking Iran to the nuclear disarmament commission. The UN is complete horse shit

4/20/2006 8:58:08 PM

and i'm guessing they are gonna be one of the countries voting for not disarming?

4/20/2006 9:00:31 PM

thanks for the new information about the un being horse shit. no one knew that.

4/20/2006 9:00:38 PM

kinda like having China on the human rights committee?


doesn't matter...we can handle Iran with or without the UN if it comes down to it.

4/20/2006 9:02:39 PM

it just merely proves the UN is

corrupt
self serving
and spineless

irrelevant

[Edited on April 20, 2006 at 9:11 PM. Reason : thanks]

4/20/2006 9:07:49 PM

i dont know whats gotten into me lately but i'm really gearing up for the iran war

like i think this is a good chance for the us to finally show its muscle and fuck someone up

i'm tired of this, we always try to play nice way bullshit, i wanna see some agression

and i bet if we started rationing off shit like in ww2, we could be a better nation because of it

4/20/2006 9:09:50 PM

^^

you forgot to say the most important one

irrelevant

4/20/2006 9:10:32 PM

im only going back in the army if shit gets hella crazy other than that, fuck the military, i tried and ill just stick to busting criminals

correction noted, thank you

[Edited on April 20, 2006 at 9:12 PM. Reason : .]

4/20/2006 9:11:35 PM

Those fucking pussies.

If you guys want I'll go bang on their front door and call them bitches to their faces

4/20/2006 9:28:01 PM

Quote :

"kinda like having China on the human rights committee?"

Also kind of like the US pushing for elections and democracy all over the world when it is the single country to have killed the most democratically elected leaders and to have propped up the most dictators in the past 50 or so years.

CHICKENS COMING HOME TO ROOST???

4/20/2006 9:36:18 PM

you went there and didnt bring up jim crow laws?
honestly im dissapointed.

4/20/2006 9:42:16 PM

Quote :

"CHICKENS COMING HOME TO ROOST???"

Oh snap...

Why'd you have to bring that up?

4/20/2006 9:42:16 PM

dissapointing if this is true

link?

4/20/2006 10:09:10 PM

Quote :

"like i think this is a good chance for the us to finally show its muscle and fuck someone up i'm tired of this, we always try to play nice way bullshit, i wanna see some agression"

haha, WHAT?

4/20/2006 10:13:09 PM

lol goddamn the UN is worthless.

4/20/2006 11:03:36 PM

Quote :

"Also kind of like the US pushing for elections and democracy all over the world when it is the single country to have killed the most democratically elected leaders and to have propped up the most dictators in the past 50 or so years."

Are you fucking high? Hey I can play this game too!

OMG!!!11!! BECAUSE EGYPT, LIKE ENSLAVED THE ISRAELITES BACK LIKE 10,000 YEARS AGO, THEY CAN NO LONGER SAY SHIT ABOUT ANYTHING TO ANYONE! AND WHAT ABOUT ALL THOSE DICTATOR FASCIST PHAROAHS?? WHAT WHAT?!?!

4/20/2006 11:15:22 PM

Iran's a big fucking country. Fuck that shit, ya'll can go right ahead with fixing the world's problems after I turn 27.

4/20/2006 11:24:45 PM

I didn't say I want to. I just said I think the quote above is pretty lame.

Fuck, if we go to another war, just start dropping the nukes. No boots required.

4/20/2006 11:38:13 PM

what about Libya's behavior in the 80s while we were propping up those dictators? should they still be punished in your opinion? i bet you think so.

fyi: libya is a very interesting situation these days. theyre actually turning their support and attention towards african unity and improvement of the continent, no longer being a major player in the arab world.

4/21/2006 1:13:55 AM

technically egypt has always been ruled by dictators (or kings/pharoahs) except when it was a colony, unless there is some period im forgetting about.
but the guy in charge now is only their what 3rd? head of state since the 50s

just a quick fyi


because although i dont fully agree with the "chickens coming home to roost" comment, it does bother me that we continue to support dictatorships while talking about a war for democracy and freedom.

4/21/2006 1:18:28 AM

i don't really care so much if other countries have democracy and freedom...i mean, I'M personally a huge fan, and don't think that we have ENOUGH...but benevolent dictatorship or whatever else is fine with me if that's what other people want.

of course, BENEVOLENT dictatorships aren't the ones we go around fucking with.

4/21/2006 1:21:06 AM

technically, isnt iran got like one supreme leader thats been in charge since like 1979?

amenijihad might be the president but i heard the supreme leader was like ayatollah al sistani(sp?)

4/21/2006 2:41:26 AM

Quote :

"and i bet if we started rationing off shit like in ww2, we could be a better nation because of it"

I actually agree with this.

Except that doing anything to Iran would be insanity.

[Edited on April 21, 2006 at 2:43 AM. Reason : ]

4/21/2006 2:43:41 AM

dude we could so easy fuck them up

4/21/2006 2:54:29 AM

Yes, in the same way that Lennox Lewis could so easily fuck up a four year old.

4/21/2006 2:57:38 AM

good point

4/21/2006 3:01:43 AM

Quote :

"Also kind of like the US pushing for elections and democracy all over the world when it is the single country to have killed the most democratically elected leaders and to have propped up the most dictators in the past 50 or so years."

don't forget not leaving iraq even though the majority of iraqis want them to, simply because the us says that the new iraqi provisional government that it created doesn't want it to.

4/21/2006 7:31:37 AM

Quote :

"amenijihad might be the president but i heard the supreme leader was like ayatollah al sistani(sp?)"

No. It's Khameni. Ayatollah Khameni. Not to be confused with the guy who ruled during the hostage crisis Ayatollah Khomeni. But those two have been in power since the 70s.

4/21/2006 8:16:46 AM

how bout we just mind our own business...take care of things at home in the US?

Iran wouldn't be a threat to is if we just chilled out. They're a threat to Israel...but that's not our problem.

4/21/2006 9:42:40 AM

if you think a threat to israel isn't our problem, you're the biggest goddamned idiot on the face of the earth.

and isolationism worked real well leading up to ww2 didn't it, genius?

4/21/2006 10:43:07 AM

When will it ever not be our problem. Seeing how Isreal is well equipped to do the job themselves, why dont we leave the pre-emptive strikes to Isreal since they are the ones that have been directly threatened. Maybe Isreal will be smart enough to wait till a sufficient amount of countries offer aid before cleaning house.

We're playing to many hands here. Iran clearly stated they dont give a shit about our threats and will retaliate no matter how bad we destroy them. Do we really want that, to further drive the wedge between Middle Eastern culture and the West more so than it already is? Is this somehow going to solve our problems and avert terrorist activity in the long run?

4/21/2006 3:19:02 PM

i wouldn't mind terribly if we nuked middle eastern culture off the face of the planet

[Edited on April 21, 2006 at 3:26 PM. Reason : .]

4/21/2006 3:25:55 PM

Well thats your opinion, respectable or not.

What we got to realize is that we have ways of making nukes a lot more powerful in this day and age. We cant just go carpet bombing the whole middle east and expect the surrounding nations of Europe and Asia to be happy about it.

[Edited on April 21, 2006 at 3:33 PM. Reason : thats not good PR]

4/21/2006 3:31:49 PM

The UN will scold us, not do anything, and then buy from our newly discovered oil reserves

4/21/2006 3:34:13 PM

No, i'm thinking more along the lines of WW3, followed by a brief period of peace, then another set of World War's, then finally end at WW19 in the year 2223 with the world exploding in a violent but beautiful explosion.

4/21/2006 3:38:16 PM

Quote :

"i wouldn't mind terribly if we nuked middle eastern culture off the face of the planet"

"Why do they hate us"?

"Why do they want to kill us?"



With trigger-happy people like you in the US Army (at least I think you are in the Army, unless my info is wrong), no wonder there is so much hatred in the world.

People like you on both sides should be wiped off the planet before you/they get a chance to kill peaceful people.

Oh shit, that's already happening ALL OVER THE WORLD.

4/21/2006 3:48:30 PM

i don't think he's military

4/21/2006 3:50:02 PM

Sorry, wrong info in that case.

Either way, he is just as bad as MullaOmar/BinLaden/Saddam/MassMurderer.

4/21/2006 3:52:24 PM

yes

because someone not liking you

is a completely legit reason to fill a vehicle up with explosives and go kill random people that you also think dont like you.

its nice to know that all of the irrational, ignorant, and unfounded hatred is all on this side of the pond.

4/21/2006 3:55:44 PM

im not in the army and im obvsiously joking.

i dont have any desire to kill "innocent" people.


i'd be happy to just say fuck the middle east and pull every last american civilian and military personel out of the area, but theres no guarantee that the extremist whack jobs wouldn't come back to power and try to kill us.

[Edited on April 21, 2006 at 3:58 PM. Reason : .]

4/21/2006 3:56:02 PM

double post, my connection is acting weird today



[Edited on April 21, 2006 at 4:06 PM. Reason : ,]

4/21/2006 4:04:14 PM

Quote :

"im obvsiously joking."

Yeah, I figured that much. I agree about getting every last man out, but I also feel tieing up lose ends is a priority. The faster we get better experienced men running this war the better. Rummy needs to get the boot, but he should be gracious enough to resign on his own.

4/21/2006 4:04:44 PM

if we pull out now, iraqi folks are gonna die and the nutjobs come back to power.

if we stay, the nutjobs continue to blow themselves up and kill americans and iraqis

changing leaders wont do anything.

4/21/2006 4:10:07 PM

Changing leaders has to at least change something in the war. I know it depends on what kind of leader that would be, but hypothetically speaking if we get someone who atleast listens to the troops on the field, more so then Rumsfield does, than maybe things might get done. More crackdowns means more security. Better use of resources and better moral among privates can only help. Come 2008 there's gonna be change in the way this war is managed, whether a republican or democrat wins. I dont know about you but this Iraq situation has to come to head sometime.



[Edited on April 21, 2006 at 4:20 PM. Reason : .]

4/21/2006 4:17:45 PM

the only possible thing a change in leadership would do is make us decide to pull out.


listening to the troops does not stop nutjobs from trying to kill the troops

4/21/2006 4:25:01 PM

whatever town 0EP's in.... nuke it.

it obviously has no redeeming qualities.

4/21/2006 4:27:39 PM

^^Not true, from what I know the soldiers that enlist in the military are very patriotic. I think a lot of them would say "stay the course" no matter what. Also, if a presidential canditate were to go for the "cut and run" stance he would get fire from both sides of the political spectrum. People that say "cut and run" or "nuke it all" are the ones not taken seriously.



[Edited on April 21, 2006 at 4:36 PM. Reason : punctuation yo]

4/21/2006 4:32:46 PM

Quote :

"whatever town 0EP's in.... nuke it. it obviously has no redeeming qualities."

thanks for acting like a typical arrogant american and judging a whole town based on the qualities of one person residing within.

(yeah, i know what you and maybe some others will say next... don't bother)

4/21/2006 4:35:43 PM

so what can we do to get middleEastRelations++ ?

4/21/2006 4:36:45 PM

Use elite diplomatic skillz

nah...

hrmmm..I think the next president really should learn some arabic. Maybe speak to them in their language. Bush uses spanish when he talks in Mexico, pretty fluent too.

We just need to make a Passion of the Mohammad movie. Thats it.

4/21/2006 4:41:00 PM